Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas L. Arnow

dblp:97/2300 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 87% Visualization and visual analytics · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › feature detection
corner detection
0.112007
Foveated Visual Search for Corners · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2007
Image and video processing › feature extraction
feature detection and description
0.112007
Foveated Visual Search for Corners · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2007
Visualization and visual analytics
visual attention
0.012007
Foveated Visual Search for Corners · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

saccade modeling · 0.1information-theoretic measure · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Foveated Visual Search for Corners
abstract
We cast the problem of corner detection as a corner search process. We develop principles of foveated visual search and automated fixation selection to accomplish the corner search, supplying a case study of both foveated search and foveated feature detection. The result is a new algorithm for finding corners, which is also a corner-based algorithm for aiming computed foveated visual fixations. In the algorithm, long saccades move the fovea to previously unexplored areas of the image, while short saccades improve the accuracy of putative corner locations. The system is tested on two natural scenes. As an interesting comparison study, we compare fixations generated by the algorithm with those of subjects viewing the same images, whose eye movements are being recorded by an eye tracker. The comparison of fixation patterns is made using an information-theoretic measure. Results show that the algorithm is a good locater of corners, but does not correlate particularly well with human visual fixations.
Thomas L. Arnow, Alan C. Bovik
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1