Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sanjev Krishnamohan

dblp:97/2326 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › component-based software engineering
component-based systems
0.112006
An Automated Formal Approach to Managing Dynamic Reconfiguration · ASE 2006
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution › software adaptation
dynamic reconfiguration
0.112006
An Automated Formal Approach to Managing Dynamic Reconfiguration · ASE 2006
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.112006
An Automated Formal Approach to Managing Dynamic Reconfiguration · ASE 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

service-oriented architecture · 0.1reflective component model · 0.1alloy analyzer · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 An Automated Formal Approach to Managing Dynamic Reconfiguration
abstract
Dynamic reconfiguration is the process of making changes to software at run-time. The motivation for this is typically to facilitate adaptive systems which change their behavior in response to changes in their operating environment or to allow systems with a requirement for continuous service to evolve uninterrupted. To enable development of reconfigurable applications, we have developed OpenRec, a framework which comprises a reflective component model plus an open and extensible reconfiguration management infrastructure. Recently we have extended OpenRec to verify whether an intended (re)configuration would result in an application's structural constraints being satisfied. Consequently OpenRec can automatically veto proposed changes that would violate configuration constraints. This functionality has been realized by integrating OpenRec with the ALLOY Analyzer tool via a service-oriented architecture. ALLOY is a formal modelling notation which can be used to specify systems and associated constraints. In this paper, we present an overview of the OpenRec framework. In addition, we describe the application of ALLOY to modelling re-configurable component based systems and highlight some interesting experiences with integrating OpenRec and the ALLOY Analyzer
Ian Warren, Jing Sun 0002, Sanjev Krishnamohan, Thiranjith Weerasinghe
ASE3