Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

P. Jerome Kilpatrick

dblp:97/4851 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Haptics and multimodal interaction
tactile display
0.011990
Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization · SIGGRAPH 1990
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
molecular docking
0.011990
Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization · SIGGRAPH 1990
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic interaction
force-feedback interaction
0.011990
Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization · SIGGRAPH 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

molecular docking simulation · 0.06-d force display · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization
abstract
We began in 1967 a project to develop a haptic+display for 6-D force fields of interacting protein molecules. We approached it in four stages: a 2-D system, a 3-D system tested with a simple task, a 6-D system tested with a simple task, and a full 6-D molecular docking system, our initial goal. This paper summarizes the entire project---the four systems, the evaluation experiments, the results, and our observations. The molecular docking system results are new.Our principal conclusions are:• Haptic display as an augmentation to visual display can improve perception and understanding both of force fields and of world models populated with impenetrable objects.• Whereas man-machine systems can outperform computer-only systems by orders of magnitude on some problems, haptic-augmented interactive systems seem to give about a two-fold performance improvement over purely graphical interactive systems. Better technology may give somewhat more, but a ten-fold improvement does not seem to be in the cards.• Chemists using GROPE-III can readily reproduce the true docking positions for drugs whose docking is known (but not to them) and can find very good docks for drugs whose true docks are unknown. The present tool promises to yield new chemistry research results; it is being actively used by research chemists.• The most valuable result from using GROPE-III for drug docking is probably the radically improved situation awareness that serious users report. Chemists say they have a new understanding of the details of the receptor site and its force fields, and of why a particular drug docks well or poorly.• We see various scientific/education applications for haptic displays but believe entertainment, not scientific visualization, will drive and pace the technology.• The hardware-software system technology we have used is barely adequate, and our experience sets priorities for future development.• Some unexpected perceptual phenomena were observed. All of these worked for us, not against us.
Frederick P. Brooks Jr., Ouhyoung Ming, James J. Batter, P. Jerome Kilpatrick
SIGGRAPH4