Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Whelan

dblp:97/5840 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenomics
0.312018
PREQUAL: detecting non-homologous characters in sets of unaligned homologous sequences · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment
pre-alignment filtering
0.312018
PREQUAL: detecting non-homologous characters in sets of unaligned homologous sequences · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular evolution
0.212015
GeLL: a generalized likelihood library for phylogenetic models · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
phylogenetic model
0.212015
GeLL: a generalized likelihood library for phylogenetic models · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
substitution model
0.212015
GeLL: a generalized likelihood library for phylogenetic models · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
gene family evolution
0.112012
Determining the evolutionary history of gene families · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.112012
Measuring the distance between multiple sequence alignments · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.122012
Determining the evolutionary history of gene families · Bioinform. 2012
Pandit: a database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic inference
0.122012
Measuring the distance between multiple sequence alignments · Bioinform. 2012
Pandit: a database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
alternative splicing analysis
0.112008
Determination and validation of principal gene products · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › evolutionary history reconstruction
ancestral sequence reconstruction
0.012012
Determining the evolutionary history of gene families · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
sequence database
0.012003
Pandit: a database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic modeling · 0.3sequence simulation · 0.2likelihood calculation · 0.2ancestral reconstruction · 0.2maximum likelihood · 0.2weighted parsimony · 0.1markov model · 0.1indel event modeling · 0.1alignment distance metrics · 0.1cross-species conservation analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 PREQUAL: detecting non-homologous characters in sets of unaligned homologous sequences
abstract
Summary: Phylogenomic datasets invariably contain undetected stretches of non-homologous characters due to poor-quality sequences or erroneous gene models. The large-scale multi-gene nature of these datasets renders impractical or impossible detailed manual curation of sequences, but few tools exist that can automate this task. To address this issue, we developed a new method that takes as input a set of unaligned homologous sequences and uses an explicit probabilistic approach to identify and mask regions with non-homologous adjacent characters. These regions are defined as sharing no statistical support for homology with any other sequence in the set, which can result from e.g. sequencing errors or gene prediction errors creating frameshifts. Our methodology is implemented in the program PREQUAL, which is a fast and accurate tool for high-throughput filtering of sequences. The program is primarily aimed at amino acid sequences, although it can handle protein coding DNA sequences as well. It is fully customizable to allow fine-tuning of the filtering sensitivity. Availability and implementation: The program PREQUAL is written in C/C++ and available through a GNU GPL v3.0 at https://github.com/simonwhelan/prequal. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Simon Whelan, Iker Irisarri, Fabien Burki
Bioinform.1
2015 GeLL: a generalized likelihood library for phylogenetic models
abstract
UNLABELLED: Phylogenetic models are an important tool in molecular evolution allowing us to study the pattern and rate of sequence change. The recent influx of new sequence data in the biosciences means that to address evolutionary questions, we need a means for rapid and easy model development and implementation. Here we present GeLL, a Java library that lets users use text to quickly and efficiently define novel forms of discrete data and create new substitution models that describe how those data change on a phylogeny. GeLL allows users to define general substitution models and data structures in a way that is not possible in other existing libraries, including mixture models and non-reversible models. Classes are provided for calculating likelihoods, optimizing model parameters and branch lengths, ancestral reconstruction and sequence simulation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://phylo.bio.ku.edu/GeLL under a GPL v3 license.
Daniel Money, Simon Whelan
Bioinform.2
2012 Determining the evolutionary history of gene families
abstract
MOTIVATION: Recent large-scale studies of individuals within a population have demonstrated that there is widespread variation in copy number in many gene families. In addition, there is increasing evidence that the variation in gene copy number can give rise to substantial phenotypic effects. In some cases, these variations have been shown to be adaptive. These observations show that a full understanding of the evolution of biological function requires an understanding of gene gain and gene loss. Accurate, robust evolutionary models of gain and loss events are, therefore, required. RESULTS: We have developed weighted parsimony and maximum likelihood methods for inferring gain and loss events. To test these methods, we have used Markov models of gain and loss to simulate data with known properties. We examine three models: a simple birth-death model, a single rate model and a birth-death innovation model with parameters estimated from Drosophila genome data. We find that for all simulations maximum likelihood-based methods are very accurate for reconstructing the number of duplication events on the phylogenetic tree, and that maximum likelihood and weighted parsimony have similar accuracy for reconstructing the ancestral state. Our implementations are robust to different model parameters and provide accurate inferences of ancestral states and the number of gain and loss events. For ancestral reconstruction, we recommend weighted parsimony because it has similar accuracy to maximum likelihood, but is much faster. For inferring the number of individual gene loss or gain events, maximum likelihood is noticeably more accurate, albeit at greater computational cost. AVAILABILITY: www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/dupliphy CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Ryan M. Ames, Daniel Money, Vikramsinh P. Ghatge, Simon Whelan, Simon C. Lovell
Bioinform.4
2012 Measuring the distance between multiple sequence alignments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a core method in bioinformatics. The accuracy of such alignments may influence the success of downstream analyses such as phylogenetic inference, protein structure prediction, and functional prediction. The importance of MSA has lead to the proliferation of MSA methods, with different objective functions and heuristics to search for the optimal MSA. Different methods of inferring MSAs produce different results in all but the most trivial cases. By measuring the differences between inferred alignments, we may be able to develop an understanding of how these differences (i) relate to the objective functions and heuristics used in MSA methods, and (ii) affect downstream analyses. RESULTS: We introduce four metrics to compare MSAs, which include the position in a sequence where a gap occurs or the location on a phylogenetic tree where an insertion or deletion (indel) event occurs. We use both real and synthetic data to explore the information given by these metrics and demonstrate how the different metrics in combination can yield more information about MSA methods and the differences between them. AVAILABILITY: MetAl is a free software implementation of these metrics in Haskell. Source and binaries for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X are available from http://kumiho.smith.man.ac.uk/whelan/software/metal/.
Benjamin P. Blackburne, Simon Whelan
Bioinform.2
2008 Determination and validation of principal gene products
abstract
MOTIVATION: Alternative splicing has the potential to generate a wide range of protein isoforms. For many computational applications and for experimental research, it is important to be able to concentrate on the isoform that retains the core biological function. For many genes this is far from clear. RESULTS: We have combined five methods into a pipeline that allows us to detect the principal variant for a gene. Most of the methods were based on conservation between species, at the level of both gene and protein. The five methods used were the conservation of exonic structure, the detection of non-neutral evolution, the conservation of functional residues, the existence of a known protein structure and the abundance of vertebrate orthologues. The pipeline was able to determine a principal isoform for 83% of a set of well-annotated genes with multiple variants.
Michael L. Tress, Jan-Jaap Wesselink, Adam Frankish, Gonzalo López, Nick Goldman, Ari Löytynoja, Tim Massingham, Fabio Pardi, Simon Whelan, Jennifer L. Harrow, Alfonso Valencia
Bioinform.9
2006 Phylogenetics by likelihood: Evolutionary modeling as a tool for understanding the genome
Carolin Kosiol, Lee Bofkin, Simon Whelan
J. Biomed. Informatics3
2003 Pandit: a database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees
abstract
MOTIVATION: A large, high-quality database of homologous sequence alignments with good estimates of their corresponding phylogenetic trees will be a valuable resource to those studying phylogenetics. It will allow researchers to compare current and new models of sequence evolution across a large variety of sequences. The large quantity of data may provide inspiration for new models and methodology to study sequence evolution and may allow general statements about the relative effect of different molecular processes on evolution. RESULTS: The Pandit 7.6 database contains 4341 families of sequences derived from the seed alignments of the Pfam database of amino acid alignments of families of homologous protein domains (Bateman et al., 2002). Each family in Pandit includes an alignment of amino acid sequences that matches the corresponding Pfam family seed alignment, an alignment of DNA sequences that contain the coding sequence of the Pfam alignment when they can be recovered (overall, 82.9% of sequences taken from Pfam) and the alignment of amino acid sequences restricted to only those sequences for which a DNA sequence could be recovered. Each of the alignments has an estimate of the phylogenetic tree associated with it. The tree topologies were obtained using the neighbor joining method based on maximum likelihood estimates of the evolutionary distances, with branch lengths then calculated using a standard maximum likelihood approach.
Simon Whelan, Paul I. W. de Bakker, Nick Goldman
Bioinform.1