Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul J. A. Lever

dblp:98/2850 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 24% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › construction robotics
autonomous excavation
0.011996
Experimental robotic excavation with fuzzy logic and neural networks · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
behavior-based control
0.011996
Experimental robotic excavation with fuzzy logic and neural networks · ICRA 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › hierarchical problem solving
task decomposition
0.011996
Experimental robotic excavation with fuzzy logic and neural networks · ICRA 1996
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.011994
Dempster-Shafer and Bayesian Network for CAD-Based Feature Extraction: A Comparative Investigation and Analysis · AAAI 1994
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning
belief functions
0.011994
Dempster-Shafer and Bayesian Network for CAD-Based Feature Extraction: A Comparative Investigation and Analysis · AAAI 1994
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › construction robotics
excavation
0.011994
A Fuzzy Control System for an Automated Mining Excavator · ICRA 1994
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.011994
Dempster-Shafer and Bayesian Network for CAD-Based Feature Extraction: A Comparative Investigation and Analysis · AAAI 1994
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
uncertainty reasoning
0.011994
Dempster-Shafer and Bayesian Network for CAD-Based Feature Extraction: A Comparative Investigation and Analysis · AAAI 1994
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning › fuzzy systems
fuzzy logic
0.011996
Experimental robotic excavation with fuzzy logic and neural networks · ICRA 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › intelligent control
fuzzy control
0.011994
A Fuzzy Control System for an Automated Mining Excavator · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011994
A Fuzzy Control System for an Automated Mining Excavator · ICRA 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzy logic · 0.0dempster-shafer theory · 0.0bayesian network · 0.0neural network · 0.0finite state machine · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Experimental robotic excavation with fuzzy logic and neural networks
abstract
This paper describes experimental results for autonomous robotic rock excavation with fuzzy logic and neural networks. An excavation goal is decomposed into several tasks, whereas a take is accomplished by executing appropriate excavation behaviors. Finally, a behavior is carried out by a sequence of primitive, machine executing excavation actions. Excavation goals, tasks, and behaviors are specified using finite state machines (FSM) based on excavation heuristics and expertise from skilled human operators. The decision making in the FSMs are implemented using neural networks which are capable of improving their performance from previous task executions. Excavation actions are given using fuzzy logic rules acquired from human experience and heuristics. Several experiments are presented that demonstrate the system's ability to complete required excavation tasks effectively.
Xiaobo Shi, Paul J. A. Lever, Fei-Yue Wang 0001
ICRA2
1994 Dempster-Shafer and Bayesian Network for CAD-Based Feature Extraction: A Comparative Investigation and Analysis
Michael M. Marefat, Paul J. A. Lever
AAAI3
1994 A Fuzzy Control System for an Automated Mining Excavator
abstract
To automate a mining excavator the control issues resulting from environmental uncertainties must be solved. In particular the interactions between the excavation tool and the excavation environment are dynamic, unstructured and complex. Thus, generating rigorous mathematical models as required by conventional control techniques is extremely difficult if possible. This paper presents an excavator controller that uses fuzzy logic to interpret forces and torques gathered from a wrist mounted force/torque sensor during the excavation process. This approach enables the transfer of human heuristics and expert knowledge to the controller. Experimental results from several excavation tests using the fuzzy logic controller are given. These results represent the first step toward an integrated approach that uses force/torque, vision, and other sensor data to perform generic tasks in uncertain mining environments.>
Paul J. A. Lever, Fei-Yue Wang 0001, Deqian Chen
ICRA1