Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hiromi Nakaiwa

dblp:99/1732 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Audio and music processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical resources
lexical resource construction
0.112006
An Implemented Description of Japanese: The Lexeed Dictionary and the Hinoki Treebank · ACL 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.112006
An Implemented Description of Japanese: The Lexeed Dictionary and the Hinoki Treebank · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation › corpus annotation
treebank
0.112006
An Implemented Description of Japanese: The Lexeed Dictionary and the Hinoki Treebank · ACL 2006
Audio and music processing › speech recognition
large vocabulary continuous speech recognition
0.112006
The ATR multilingual speech-to-speech translation system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing
speech recognition
0.112006
The ATR multilingual speech-to-speech translation system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing
speech synthesis
0.112006
The ATR multilingual speech-to-speech translation system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing › speech processing › speech translation
speech-to-speech translation
0.112006
The ATR multilingual speech-to-speech translation system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing › speech synthesis
text-to-speech synthesis
0.112006
The ATR multilingual speech-to-speech translation system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical machine learning · 0.1edit distance · 0.1decision tree · 0.1HPSG grammar · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Automatic detection of antecedents of Japanese zero pronouns using a Japanese-English bilingual corpus
Dong Zhan, Hiromi Nakaiwa
MTSummit2
2006 An Implemented Description of Japanese: The Lexeed Dictionary and the Hinoki Treebank
abstract
In this paper we describe the current state of a new Japanese lexical resource: the Hinoki treebank. The treebank is built from dictionary definition sentences, and uses an HPSG based Japanese grammar to encode both syntactic and semantic information. It is combined with an ontology based on the definition sentences to give a detailed sense level description of the most familiar 28,000 words of Japanese.
Sanae Fujita, Takaaki Tanaka, Francis Bond, Hiromi Nakaiwa
ACL4
2006 Using multiple edit distances to automatically grade outputs from Machine translation systems
abstract
This paper addresses the challenging problem of automatically evaluating output from machine translation (MT) systems that are subsystems of speech-to-speech MT (SSMT) systems. Conventional automatic MT evaluation methods include BLEU, which MT researchers have frequently used. However, BLEU has two drawbacks in SSMT evaluation. First, BLEU assesses errors lightly at the beginning of translations and heavily in the middle, even though its assessments should be independent of position. Second, BLEU lacks tolerance in accepting colloquial sentences with small errors, although such errors do not prevent us from continuing an SSMT-mediated conversation. In this paper, the authors report a new evaluation method called “g Rader based on Edit Distances (RED)” that automatically grades each MT output by using a decision tree (DT). The DT is learned from training data that are encoded by using multiple edit distances, that is, normal edit distance (ED) defined by insertion, deletion, and replacement, as well as its extensions. The use of multiple edit distances allows more tolerance than either ED or BLEU. Each evaluated MT output is assigned a grade by using the DT. RED and BLEU were compared for the task of evaluating MT systems of varying quality on ATR's Basic Travel Expression Corpus (BTEC). Experimental results show that RED significantly outperforms BLEU.
Yasuhiro Akiba, Kenji Imamura, Eiichiro Sumita, Hiromi Nakaiwa, Shun'ichi Yamamoto, Hiroshi G. Okuno
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.4
2006 The ATR multilingual speech-to-speech translation system
abstract
In this paper, we describe the ATR multilingual speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) system, which is mainly focused on translation between English and Asian languages (Japanese and Chinese). There are three main modules of our S2ST system: large-vocabulary continuous speech recognition, machine text-to-text (T2T) translation, and text-to-speech synthesis. All of them are multilingual and are designed using state-of-the-art technologies developed at ATR. A corpus-based statistical machine learning framework forms the basis of our system design. We use a parallel multilingual database consisting of over 600 000 sentences that cover a broad range of travel-related conversations. Recent evaluation of the overall system showed that speech-to-speech translation quality is high, being at the level of a person having a Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) score of 750 out of the perfect score of 990.
Satoshi Nakamura 0001, Konstantin Markov, Hiromi Nakaiwa, Gen-ichiro Kikui, Hisashi Kawai, Takatoshi Jitsuhiro, Jinsong Zhang 0001, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Eiichiro Sumita, Seiichi Yamamoto
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3
2005 Extracting Representative Arguments from Dictionaries for Resolving Zero Pronouns
abstract
We propose a method to alleviate the problem of referential granularity for Japanese zero pronoun resolution. We use dictionary definition sentences to extract ‘representative’ arguments of predicative definition words; e.g. ‘arrest’ is likely to take police as the subject and criminal as its object. These representative arguments are far more informative than ‘person’ that is provided by other valency dictionaries. They are auto-extracted using both Shallow parsing and Deep parsing for greater quality and quantity. Initial results are highly promising, obtaining more specific information about selectional preferences. An architecture of zero pronoun resolution using these representative arguments is described.
Shigeko Nariyama, Eric Nichols, Francis Bond, Takaaki Tanaka, Hiromi Nakaiwa
MTSummit5
2004 Using a Mixture of N-Best Lists from Multiple MT Systems in Rank-Sum-Based Confidence Measure for MT Outputs
Yasuhiro Akiba, Eiichiro Sumita, Hiromi Nakaiwa, Seiichi Yamamoto, Hiroshi G. Okuno
COLING3
2004 Incremental Methods to Select Test Sentences for Evaluating Translation Ability
Yasuhiro Akiba, Eiichiro Sumita, Hiromi Nakaiwa, Seiichi Yamamoto, Hiroshi G. Okuno
LREC3
2003 Experimental comparison of MT evaluation methods: RED vs.BLEU
abstract
This paper experimentally compares two automatic evaluators, RED and BLEU, to determine how close the evaluation results of each automatic evaluator are to average evaluation results by human evaluators, following the ATR standard of MT evaluation. This paper gives several cautionary remarks intended to prevent MT developers from drawing misleading conclusions when using the automatic evaluators. In addition, this paper reports a way of using the automatic evaluators so that their results agree with those of human evaluators.
Yasuhiro Akiba, Eiichiro Sumita, Hiromi Nakaiwa, Seiichi Yamamoto, Hiroshi G. Okuno
MTSummit3
2000 Interactive generalization of a translation example using queries based on a semantic hierarchy
abstract
This paper addresses the issue of acquiring translation rules for machine translation (MT) systems that adopt a transfer approach. These rules are semantic pattern pairs (SPPs) of source and target languages. Practical MT systems must additionally contain a huge number of SPPs corresponding to rarely-used predicates and predicate usages. Such SPPs are difficult to automatically acquire with corpus-based methods. To solve this difficulty, this paper proposes a method to acquire SPPs by using queries based on a semantic hierarchy. The proposed method asks the lexicographer for the necessary information in order to generalize the conditions of SPPs and then gradually generalizes these conditions. Experimental results show that the proposed method allows the acquisition of more plausible conditions within almost the same time spent for manual generalization.
Yasuhiro Akiba, Hiromi Nakaiwa, Satoshi Shirai, Yoshifumi Ooyama
ICTAI2
1999 Automatic Extraction of Rules for Anaphora Resolution of Japanese Zero Pronouns in Japanese-English Machine Translation from Aligned Sentence Pairs
Hiromi Nakaiwa
Mach. Transl.1
1996 Anaphora Resolution of Japanese Zero Pronouns with Deictic Reference
Hiromi Nakaiwa, Satoshi Shirai
COLING1
1994 A System of Verbal Semantic Attributes Focused on the Syntactic Correspondence between Japanese and English
Hiromi Nakaiwa, Akio Yokoo, Satoru Ikehara
COLING1