Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neelam Soundararajan
dblp:99/2478
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 6 · 5 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Logic in computer science · 50% Computational complexity · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transaction processing and concurrency control
deadlock detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | A Distributed Deadlock Detection and Resolution Algorithm and Its Correctness Proof · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1988 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
deadlock detection and resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | A Distributed Deadlock Detection and Resolution Algorithm and Its Correctness Proof · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1988 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | A Distributed Deadlock Detection and Resolution Algorithm and Its Correctness Proof · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1988 |
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
axiomatic semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Axiomatic Semantics of Communicating Sequential Processes · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1984 |
Logic in computer science
semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Axiomatic Semantics of Communicating Sequential Processes · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1984 |
Logic in computer science › formal methods
correctness proofs |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | A Distributed Deadlock Detection and Resolution Algorithm and Its Correctness Proof · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
communicating sequential processes · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | A Proof System for Distributed Processes
Ann E. Kelley Sobel, Neelam Soundararajan |
Acta Informatica | 2 |
| 1988 | A Distributed Deadlock Detection and Resolution Algorithm and Its Correctness ProofabstractThe key idea of the algorithm is to let one transaction controller be in charge of all transactions in a set of interacting transactions. Two transactions are interacting if they are both interested in (accessing) the same resource. In addition, the controller is in charge of all the resources allocated to any of the transactions in the set. Having one controller in charge of all the transactions in a set of interacting transactions and all the resources allocated to them makes it easier to detect deadlocks and avoid them. The main problem dealt with is how a controller takes charge of another transaction when the transaction tries to access one of the resources currently in the control of the controller and how a controller releases a transaction back to its original controller when the transaction is no longer interested in any of the resources in which one or more of the other transactions are also interested. Communicating sequential processes (CSP) is used to code the algorithm. The correctness of the algorithm is proved in a semiformal manner.> Ahmed K. Elmagarmid, Neelam Soundararajan, Ming T. Liu |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |
| 1987 | Complexity in Classificatory Reasoning
Ashok K. Goel 0001, Neelam Soundararajan, B. Chandrasekaran 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 1987 | Proof Rules for Fault Tolerant Distributed Programs
Mathai Joseph, Abha Moitra, Neelam Soundararajan |
Sci. Comput. Program. | 3 |
| 1986 | Total Correctness of CSP Programs
Neelam Soundararajan |
Acta Informatica | 1 |
| 1985 | : Distributed Discrete Event Simulation using Dataflow
Neelam Soundararajan, Roger L. Costello |
ICPP | 2 |
| 1984 | A proof technique for parallel programs
Neelam Soundararajan |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1984 | Denotational Semantics of CSP
Neelam Soundararajan |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1984 | Axiomatic Semantics of Communicating Sequential ProcessesabstractA simple definition of the axiomatic semantics of Communicating Sequential Processes is presented.The most important aspect of the approach is that it allows dealing with the individual processes of a program in isolation from the other processes.The axiomatic semantics is used to prove the correctness of a program for partitioning sets. Neelam Soundararajan |
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. | 1 |
| 1983 | Correctness Proofs of CSP Programs
Neelam Soundararajan |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1979 | Axiomatic Proofs of Fotal Correctness of Programs
Neelam Soundararajan |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 1 |