Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Linda McIver

dblp:99/3828 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 77% Usability and user experience research · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools › interactive graphics system
diagram editing		 0.112008
Comparing usability of one-way and multi-way constraints for diagram editing · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2008
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
usability study		 0.012008
Comparing usability of one-way and multi-way constraints for diagram editing · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

usability study · 0.1comparison study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Comparing usability of one-way and multi-way constraints for diagram editing
abstract
We investigate the usability of constraint-based alignment and distribution placement tools in diagram editors. Currently one-way constraints are used to provide alignment and distribution tools in many commercial editors. We believe the limitations of these constraints lead to serious usability issues, and thus suggest that such tools be implemented using multi-way constraints. We have conducted two usability studies, the first studies we are aware of that examine the relative usefulness of interactive graphical tools based on one-way and multi-way constraints. They provide strong evidence that multi-way constraint-based alignment and distribution tools are more usable than one-way constraint-based alignment and distribution tools.
Michael Wybrow, Kim Marriott, Linda McIver, Peter J. Stuckey
 ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.3