Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Howard W. Sabrin
dblp:99/7147
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition
speaker classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Speaker classification using composite hypothesis testing and list decoding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2005 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speaker recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Speaker classification using composite hypothesis testing and list decoding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2005 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition
speaker verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Speaker classification using composite hypothesis testing and list decoding · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
list decoding · 0.1gaussian mixture model · 0.1composite hypothesis testing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Speaker classification using composite hypothesis testing and list decodingabstractSpeaker classification is seen as a hypothesis testing problem of J simple hypotheses and a composite hypothesis. The simple hypotheses represent target speakers while the composite hypothesis represents nontarget speakers. The simple hypotheses have well-defined distributions that are estimated from training signals. The distribution of the signal under the composite hypothesis is assumed to belong to a given family. The parameter of that distribution is assumed random with a prior distribution that is estimated from a large set of speakers. This formulation converts the problem to that of testing J+1 simple hypotheses. Signals corresponding to target and nontarget speakers are assumed Gaussian mixtures processes. Once the system has been trained, list decoding is applied in which a test signal is associated with a list of possible speakers. The probability that the correct speaker is on the list is maximized for a given average number of incorrect speakers on the list. Results from speaker identification and speaker verification experiments are reported. In speaker identification using a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database with 174 target speakers, over 77% correct identification was achieved for an average of less than two erroneous speakers on the list. Speaker verification experiments on a similar database yielded results, expressed in terms of the equal-error-rate, of 6.7% and 10.1% using two decision rules. William J. J. Roberts, Yariv Ephraim, Howard W. Sabrin |
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. | 3 |