Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Demissie B. Aredo

dblp:a/DemissieBAredo · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 33% Requirements engineering and software design · 33% Software maintenance and evolution · 33%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
model-based verification
0.012004
Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004
Software maintenance and evolution
software inspection
0.012004
Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004
Requirements engineering and software design
UML model verification
0.012004
Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lightweight formal methods · 0.1UML · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 An integrated framework for formal development of open distributed systems
Issa Traoré, Demissie B. Aredo
Inf. Softw. Technol.2
2004 Enhancing Structured Review with Model-Based Verification
abstract
We propose a development framework that extends the scope of structured review by supplementing the structured review with model-based verification. The proposed approach uses the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a modeling notation. We discuss a set of correctness arguments that can be used in conjunction with formal verification and validation (V&V) in order to improve the quality and dependability of systems in a cost-effective way. Formal methods can be esoteric; consequently, their large scale application is hindered. We propose a framework based on the integration of lightweight formal methods and structured reviews. Moreover, we show that structured reviews enable us to handle aspects of V&V that cannot be fully automated. To demonstrate the feasibility of our approach, we have conducted a study on a security-critical system - a patient document service (PDS) system.
Issa Traoré, Demissie B. Aredo
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
2002 Combining Graphical and Formal Development of Open Distributed Systems
Einar Broch Johnsen, Olaf Owe, Demissie B. Aredo
IFM4
2001 Specification of Distributed Systems with a Combination of Graphica and Formal Languages
abstract
Convenience in specification and possibility for formal analysis are, to some extent, exclusive aspects of system specification. This paper describes an approach that emphasizes both aspects, by combining UML with a language for observable behavior of interfaces, OUN. These are complementary in the sense that one is graphical and semi-formal while the other is textual and formal. The approach is demonstrated by a case study.
Einar Broch Johnsen, Olaf Owe, Demissie B. Aredo
APSEC4