Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shekhar Borkar

dblp:b/ShekharYBorkar · also Shekhar Y. Borkar · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
46ranked-venue papers
16as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 46 · 16 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 10 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
20 papers
Integrated circuit design · 39% Energy-efficient computing · 27% Electronic design automation · 14%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 47, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
many-core architecture
0.222013
Runnemede: An architecture for Ubiquitous High-Performance Computing · HPCA 2013
Thousand Core ChipsA Technology Perspective · DAC 2007
Energy-efficient computing
low-power design
0.222012
Near-threshold voltage (NTV) design: opportunities and challenges · DAC 2012
Total power optimization by simultaneous dual-Vt allocation and device sizing in high performance microprocessors · DAC 2002
Energy-efficient computing › voltage scaling
near-threshold voltage operation
0.212013
Runnemede: An architecture for Ubiquitous High-Performance Computing · HPCA 2013
Memory systems
on-chip memory
0.212013
Runnemede: An architecture for Ubiquitous High-Performance Computing · HPCA 2013
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.212013
Power management and delivery for high-performance microprocessors · DAC 2013
Integrated circuit design › power delivery network
voltage regulator
0.212013
Power management and delivery for high-performance microprocessors · DAC 2013
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design
0.222012
Near-threshold voltage (NTV) design: opportunities and challenges · DAC 2012
Life is CMOS: why chase the life after? · DAC 2002
Integrated circuit design › low-power circuit design
near-threshold voltage design
0.112012
Near-threshold voltage (NTV) design: opportunities and challenges · DAC 2012
Integrated circuit design › low-power circuit design
subthreshold circuit design
0.112012
Near-threshold voltage (NTV) design: opportunities and challenges · DAC 2012
Integrated circuit design › technology scaling
CMOS scaling
0.122009
Design perspectives on 22nm CMOS and beyond · DAC 2009
Life is CMOS: why chase the life after? · DAC 2002
Integrated circuit design
3d integration
0.112011
3D integration for energy efficient system design · DAC 2011
Energy-efficient computing
energy-efficient system design
0.112011
3D integration for energy efficient system design · DAC 2011
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices › MOS technology
nanoscale CMOS
0.122006
Electronics beyond nano-scale CMOS · DAC 2006
Design and reliability challenges in nanometer technologies · DAC 2004
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.122009
Design perspectives on 22nm CMOS and beyond · DAC 2009
Is statistical timing statistically significant? · DAC 2004
Energy-efficient computing › power management
dynamic voltage and frequency scaling
0.112009
Circuit techniques for dynamic variation tolerance · DAC 2009
Integrated circuit design › variation-aware design
variation-tolerant circuit design
0.112009
Circuit techniques for dynamic variation tolerance · DAC 2009
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.112008
Custom is from Venus and synthesis from Mars · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation
design methodology
0.122003
Nanometer design: place your bets · DAC 2003
Panel: Is Nanometer Design Under Control? · DAC 2001
Energy-efficient computing › power management
fine-grain power management
0.112007
Thousand Core ChipsA Technology Perspective · DAC 2007
Energy-efficient computing
leakage power reduction
0.122002
Life is CMOS: why chase the life after? · DAC 2002
Total power optimization by simultaneous dual-Vt allocation and device sizing in high performance microprocessors · DAC 2002
Integrated circuit design
analog and mixed-signal circuits
0.112006
Tomorrow's analog: just dead or just different? · DAC 2006
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices › device scaling
CMOS scaling limits
0.112006
Electronics beyond nano-scale CMOS · DAC 2006
Integrated circuit design › VLSI design
gigascale integration
0.012004
Microarchitecture and Design Challenges for Gigascale Integration · MICRO 2004
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.012004
Design and reliability challenges in nanometer technologies · DAC 2004
Electronic design automation › timing analysis
statistical timing analysis
0.012004
Is statistical timing statistically significant? · DAC 2004
Electronic design automation
timing analysis
0.012004
Is statistical timing statistically significant? · DAC 2004
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
variation tolerance
0.012004
Design and reliability challenges in nanometer technologies · DAC 2004
Integrated circuit design
process-voltage-temperature variation
0.012003
Parameter variations and impact on circuits and microarchitecture · DAC 2003
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › die-to-die interconnect
3d interconnect
0.012011
3D integration for energy efficient system design · DAC 2011
Integrated circuit design
heterogeneous integration
0.012011
3D integration for energy efficient system design · DAC 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2hardware-software co-design · 0.23d integration technology · 0.1technology and economic analysis · 0.1technology perspective · 0.1technology outlook · 0.1technology scaling analysis · 0.0statistical analysis · 0.0CAD solutions · 0.0variation analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Security Closure of Physical Layouts ICCAD Special Session Paper
abstract
Computer-aided design (CAD) tools traditionally optimize for power, performance, and area (PPA). However, given a vast number of hardware security threats, we call for secure-by-design CAD flows, to adopt principles of secure hardware design and streamline security closure throughout the flow. The stakes are high for integrated circuit (IC) vendors and design companies, as security risks that are not addressed during design will inevitably be exploited in the field, where vulnerabilities are almost impossible to fix. This paper highlights the need for security closure of physical layouts because efforts taken toward securing ICs at higher abstraction layers may be futile without support for securing the tape-out ready layouts.
Johann Knechtel, Jayanth Gopinath, Jitendra Bhandari, Mohammed Ashraf, Hussam Amrouch, Shekhar Borkar, Sung Kyu Lim, Ozgur Sinanoglu, Ramesh Karri
ICCAD6
2017 Traleika Glacier: A hardware-software co-designed approach to exascale computing
Vincent Cavé, Romain Cledat, Ankit More, Balasubramanian Seshasayee, Shekhar Borkar, Sanjay Chatterjee, Dave Dunning, Joshua B. Fryman
Parallel Comput.6
2014 Resiliency for many-core system on a chip
abstract
Resilient techniques are commonly employed for dynamic and static variation tolerance. In this paper, we present an adaptive clocking technique that achieves 31% throughput increase with 15% energy reduction, and an adaptive interconnect fabric technique that increases bandwidth by 63% with 14.6% energy reduction. We also discuss variations in many-core microprocessors and some techniques to enable a resilient many-core system on a chip.
Tanay Karnik, James W. Tschanz, Nitin Borkar, Jason Howard, Sriram R. Vangal, Vivek De, Shekhar Borkar
ASP-DAC7
2013 Power management and delivery for high-performance microprocessors
abstract
This paper provides an introduction to advanced power management and delivery techniques that have been employed in leading microprocessor designs. The techniques need multiple voltage rails supplied by independent voltage regulators. We provide justification for near-load regulators and explain the practical challenges associated with the regulator integration.
Tanay Karnik, Mondira (Mandy) Deb Pant, Shekhar Borkar
DAC3
2013 Runnemede: An architecture for Ubiquitous High-Performance Computing
abstract
DARPA's Ubiquitous High-Performance Computing (UHPC) program asked researchers to develop computing systems capable of achieving energy efficiencies of 50 GOPS/Watt, assuming 2018-era fabrication technologies. This paper describes Runnemede, the research architecture developed by the Intel-led UHPC team. Runnemede is being developed through a co-design process that considers the hardware, the runtime/OS, and applications simultaneously. Near-threshold voltage operation, fine-grained power and clock management, and separate execution units for runtime and application code are used to reduce energy consumption. Memory energy is minimized through application-managed on-chip memory and direct physical addressing. A hierarchical on-chip network reduces communication energy, and a codelet-based execution model supports extreme parallelism and fine-grained tasks. We present an initial evaluation of Runnemede that shows the design process for our on-chip network, demonstrates 2-4x improvements in memory energy from explicit control of on-chip memory, and illustrates the impact of hardware-software co-design on the energy consumption of a synthetic aperture radar algorithm on our architecture.
Nicholas P. Carter, Aditya Agrawal, Shekhar Borkar, Romain Cledat, Howard David, Dave Dunning, Joshua B. Fryman, Ivan Ganev, Roger A. Golliver, Rob C. Knauerhase, Richard A. Lethin, Benoît Meister, Asit K. Mishra, Wilfred R. Pinfold, Justin Teller, Josep Torrellas, Nicolas Vasilache, Ganesh Venkatesh
HPCA3
2013 Exascale Computing - A Fact or a Fiction?
abstract
Summary form only given. Compute performance increased by orders of magnitude in the last few decades, made possible by continued technology scaling, increasing frequency, providing integration capacity to realize novel architectures, and reducing energy to keep power dissipation within limit. The technology treadmill will continue, and one would expect to reach Exascale level performance this decade; however, it's the same Physics that helped you in the past will now pose some barriers-Business as usual will not be an option. The energy and power will pose as a major challenge-an Exascale machine would consume in excess of a Giga-watt! Memory & communication bandwidth with conventional technology would be prohibitive. Orders of magnitude increased parallelism, let alone explosion of parallelism created by energy saving techniques, would increase unreliability. And programming system will be posed with even severe challenge of harnessing the performance with concurrency. This talk will discuss potential solutions in all disciplines, such as circuit design, test, architecture, system design, programming system, and resiliency to pave the road towards Exascale performance.
Shekhar Borkar
IPDPS1
2012 Near-threshold voltage (NTV) design: opportunities and challenges
abstract
Moore's Law will continue providing abundance of transistors for integration, only to be limited by the energy consumption. Near threshold voltage (NTV) operation has potential to improve energy efficiency by an order of magnitude. We discuss design techniques necessary for reliable operation over a wide range of supply voltage---from nominal down to subthreshold region. The system designed for NTV can dynamically select modes of operation, from high performance, to high energy efficiency, to the lowest power.
Himanshu Kaul, Mark A. Anders 0001, Steven Hsu, Amit Agarwal 0001, Ram Krishnamurthy 0001, Shekhar Borkar
DAC6
2011 3D integration for energy efficient system design
abstract
Technology scaling will continue, doubling transistor integration capacity every two years, providing billions of transistors to enable novel systems. 3D integration technology will open the doors even further, changing the landscape, allowing heterogeneous integration of diverse technologies, with abundance of energy efficient interconnects to realize affordable complex systems that will continue to deliver higher performance. This paper presents how to exploit this new technology for energy efficient system designs.
Shekhar Borkar
DAC1
2011 Integrated inductors with magnetic materials for on-chip power conversion
Donald S. Gardner, Gerhard Schrom, Fabrice Paillet, Tanay Karnik, Shekhar Borkar
Hot Chips Symposium5
2011 3DICs for tera-scale computing: a case study
abstract
TSV-based 3D chip stacking and integration technology was proposed more than twelve years ago. Since then the concept has gained tremendous traction with significant advances in the technology and planned system prototypes. The IP portfolio in 3D process, circuits, architectures, test and assembly peaked in year 2006. Today, multiple foundries offer a TSV process for 3DICs. Many design teams in academia and industry have been working towards a convincing 3D prototype that will demonstrate form factor reduction, heterogeneous integration and higher performance. However, the commercial success of true 3DICs has been limited to DRAM stacking.This presentation will introduce technology scaling trends and new challenges. We are at an I/O inflection point due to Tera-scale computing needs. The tutorial will describe the implication to memory bandwidth and present various options. 3DICs provide an excellent alternative to address the memory bandwidth issue by providing a large near-processor memory. In this presentation we will discuss architecture, floorplanning, power routing, IO circuits, test and assembly of a large prototype processor-memory 3DIC designed for Tera-scale applications. The presentation will conclude with a discussion on test, power delivery and thermal management issues related to 3D integration.
Tanay Karnik, Dinesh Somasekhar, Shekhar Borkar
ISPD3
2009 Design perspectives on 22nm CMOS and beyond
abstract
This paper presents technology and economic challenges posed by 22nm CMOS and beyond, and how they can be addressed by advances in design technology, validation, and testing, to exploit the benefits of scaling we have enjoyed over the decades.
Shekhar Borkar
DAC1
2009 Circuit techniques for dynamic variation tolerance
abstract
Three circuit techniques for dynamic variation tolerance are presented: (i) Sensors with adaptive voltage and frequency circuits, (ii) Tunable replica circuits for timing-error prediction with error recovery, and (iii) Embedded error-detection sequential circuits with error recovery. These circuits mitigate the clock frequency guardbands for dynamic variations, thus improving microprocessor performance and energy-efficiency. These circuits are described with a focus on the different trade-offs in guardband reduction and design overhead. Opportunities for CAD to further enhance microprocessor performance and energy efficiency are offered.
Keith A. Bowman, James W. Tschanz, Chris Wilkerson, Shih-Lien Lu, Tanay Karnik, Vivek De, Shekhar Borkar
DAC7
2008 Custom is from Venus and synthesis from Mars
abstract
Due to ever increasing cost of doing design, design productivity and more specifically, cost of design has become a major bottleneck in large scale design projects. Due to the cost crunch, automated synthesis techniques have been gaining ground on manual and cost intensive (although potentially yielding higher quality of results) custom techniques. The push towards system level performance with multiple lower performance cores as opposed to single high performance core is also making the pursuit of frequency at any cost meaningless. Synthesis vs Custom has traditionally been a lively debate in microprocessor companies but now it is becoming more widespread with the desire of fabless companies to more fully utilize the technology node in order to compete with IDMs by utilizing more custom techniques. Custom hotshots argue that we cannot afford to leave performance or power on table when you are spending 3billion $s in fabs. Industry needs to get maximum benefits possible. Synthesis fanatics will argue that designers should get over the last few ps and last few nW, as time to market, cost, and system performance are the new drivers and synthesis can not only meet the challenge but beat it many times with lower power solutions. This panel will present this internal debate in a public forum.
Ruchir Puri, William H. Joyner, Shekhar Borkar, Ty Garibay, Jonathan Lotz, Robert K. Montoye
DAC3
2007 Thousand Core ChipsA Technology Perspective
abstract
This paper presents the many-core architecture, with hundreds to thousands of small cores, to deliver unprecedented compute performance in an affordable power envelope. We discuss fine grain power management, memory bandwidth, on die networks, and system resiliency for the many-core system.
Shekhar Borkar
DAC1
2007 Microprocessors in the era of terascale integration
abstract
Moore's law has deliver tera-scale level transistor integration capacity. Power, variability, reliability, aging, and testing are pose as barriers and challenges to harness this integration capacity. Advances in microarchitecture and programming systems discussed in this paper are potential solutions
Shekhar Borkar, Norman P. Jouppi, Per Stenström
DATE1
2007 Future of on-chip interconnection architectures
abstract
No abstract available
Shekhar Borkar, William J. Dally
ISLPED1
2006 Electronics beyond nano-scale CMOS
abstract
This paper presents nano-scale CMOS outlook, discusses the three tenets that have made electronics successful in the past, and using these tenets conclude that there is nothing on the horizon yet that has promise to replace CMOS. Therefore, we will make CMOS work for a foreseeable future.
Shekhar Borkar
DAC1
2006 Tomorrow's analog: just dead or just different?
abstract
This panel discusses the following topics. With the ongoing trend towards more and more digitization in applications ranging from multimedia to telecommunications, there is a big debate about whether there will remain a need for analog circuits in scaled technologies. Analog circuits do not seem to take advantage of nanometer CMOS; rather they suffer from it. So if the question is asked "Will analog scale?", you get conflicting opinions. One camp argues for an almost-all-digital future: analog/RF content should be limited, because it's difficult, expensive, risky, and can be done with DSP. The opposing camp counters that some critical circuits simply do not want (or need) to scale, and analog is only "risky" when you let digital designers do it. So, what is the future role of analog circuits in scaled CMOS, and can analog EDA tools help in this .
Shekhar Borkar, Robert W. Brodersen, Jue-Hsien Chern, Eric Naviasky, D. Saias, Charles G. Sodini
DAC1
2006 Introduction to panel discussion Probabilistic & statistical design - the wave of the future
Shekhar Borkar
VLSI-SoC1
2006 A process variation compensating technique with an on-die leakage current sensor for nanometer scale dynamic circuits
abstract
This paper describes a process compensating dynamic (PCD) circuit technique for maintaining the performance benefit of dynamic circuits and reducing the variation in delay and robustness. A variable strength keeper that is optimally programmed based on the die leakage, enables 10% faster performance, 35% reduction in delay variation, and 5times reduction in the number of robustness failing dies, compared to conventional designs. A new leakage current sensor design is also presented that can detect leakage variation and generate the keeper control signals for the PCD technique. Results based on measured leakage data show 1.9-10.2times higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and reduced sensitivity to supply and p-n skew variations compared to prior leakage sensor designs
Chris H. Kim, Kaushik Roy 0001, Steven Hsu, Ram Krishnamurthy 0001, Shekhar Borkar
IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst.5
2005 Self Calibrating Circuit Design for Variation Tolerant VLSI Systems
abstract
Increasing leakage current and aggravating process variations are showing impact on dynamic circuit performance and robustness as technology scales into the nanometer regime. This paper describes a self-calibrating process compensating dynamic (PCD) circuit technique for maintaining the performance benefit of dynamic circuits and reducing the variation in delay and robustness. A variable strength keeper that is optimally programmed based on the die leakage enables 10% faster performance, 35% reduction in delay variation, and 5/spl times/ reduction in the number of robustness failing dies compared to conventional designs. A new leakage current sensor design is also presented that can detect leakage variation and generate the keeper control signals for the PCD technique. The proposed 6-channel leakage current sensor enables high-resolution on-chip leakage measurements from multiple locations of a die, saving testing cost and realizing both die-to-die and within-die process compensation. Results based on measured leakage data show 1.9-10.2/spl times/ higher signal-to-noise ratio and reduced sensitivity to supply and P/N skew variations compared to prior leakage sensor designs. The PCD technique with the on-die leakage current sensor is applied to a 2-read, 2-write ported 128 /spl times/ 32b register file and a test chip is fabricated in 1.2V, 90nm dual-V, CMOS process.
Chris H. Kim, Steven Hsu, Ram Krishnamurthy 0001, Shekhar Borkar, Kaushik Roy 0001
IOLTS4
2005 An 8.3GHz dual supply/threshold optimized 32b integer ALU-register file loop in 90nm CMOS
abstract
In high performance microprocessors, integer execution cores are one of the hottest thermal spots and peak current/power delivery limiters. This paper describes a dual-supply and dual-threshold optimized 32-bit integer execution ALU and register file loop for 8.3GHz operation in 1.2V, 90nm CMOS technology. Aggressive supply/threshold scaling on the ALU and nominal supply/threshold on the register file enables up to 25% peak energy reduction without sacrificing performance or array bit-cells stability. A hybrid split-output style CVSL sequential level converter at the ALU-register file interface is also described for robust, DC power free dual-Vcc operation. The proposed sequential occupies 10% smaller area, and saves 11% active leakage power and 14% worst case switching power as compared to conventional CVSL style sequential at the same performance
Steven Hsu, Amit Agarwal 0001, Kaushik Roy 0001, Ram Krishnamurthy 0001, Shekhar Borkar
ISLPED5
2004 Design and reliability challenges in nanometer technologies
abstract
CMOS technology scaling is causing the channel lengths to be sub-wavelength of light. Parameter variation, caused by sub-wavelength lithography, will pose a major challenge for design and reliability of future high performance microprocessors in nanometer technologies. In this paper, we present the impact of these variations on processor functionality, predictability and reliability. We propose design and CAD solutions for variation tolerance. We conclude this paper with soft error rate scaling trends and soft error tolerant circuits for reliability enhancement.
Shekhar Borkar, Tanay Karnik, Vivek De
DAC1
2004 Is statistical timing statistically significant?
abstract
Process variations - which affect critical electrical parameters and lead to both random and systematic changes in circuit performance - have always posed significant challenges to semiconductor design. In the past, within-die process variation was relatively small, and methods such as corner-based analysis were sufficient. This allowed timing analysis tools to calculate delays, slew times, coupling and power in a straightforward way. Today, the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors suggests that the semiconductor industry's historical ability to control process variations is under siege, for both devices and interconnects. As statistical variation increases, will corner-casing lead to too much conservatism, and hence a requirement for new statistical timing and noise analysis tools? In other words, is the design flow inevitably moving to "delay is no longer a number; it's a distribution"? Or are the urgency and the advantages of statistical timing analysis overstated.
Richard Goldman, Kurt Keutzer, Clive Bittlestone, Ahsan Bootehsaz, Shekhar Borkar, Louis K. Scheffer, Chandramouli Visweswariah
DAC5
2004 Microarchitecture and Design Challenges for Gigascale Integration
abstract
VLSI system performance increased by five orders of magnitude in the last three decades, made possible by continued technology scaling, improving transistor performance to increase frequency, increasing integration capacity to realize complex architectures, and reducing energy consumed per logic operation to keep power dissipation within limit. The technology treadmill will continue, providing integration capacity of billions of transistors; however, power, energy consumption, and variations will be the barriers. Performance at any cost will not be an option in the future; VLSI systems will have to emphasize performance delivered in a given power envelope, with complexity limited by energy efficiency and variability. This talk will discuss potential solutions in process technology, circuits, and microarchitectures to exploit future gigascale integration capacity. The system on a chip (SOC) concept will help integrate diverse functional blocks, providing valued performance. The talk will conclude with recommendations to the VLSI system designers and microarchitects on how to exploit these emerging paradigms.
Shekhar Borkar
MICRO1
2003 Parameter variations and impact on circuits and microarchitecture
abstract
Parameter variation in scaled technologies beyond 90nm will pose a major challenge for design of future high performance microprocessors. In this paper, we discuss process, voltage and temperature variations; and their impact on circuit and microarchitecture. Possible solutions to reduce the impact of parameter variations and to achieve higher frequency bins are also presented.
Shekhar Borkar, Tanay Karnik, Siva G. Narendra, James W. Tschanz, Ali Keshavarzi, Vivek De
DAC1
2003 Nanometer design: place your bets
abstract
Overview Two years ago, DAC-2001 attendees enjoyed a thrilling debatepanel, “Who’s Got Nanometer Design Under Control?”, pitting sky-is-falling Physics die-hards against not-to-worry Methodology gurus. Then, the DAC audience overwhelmingly voted the match for the Methodologists. Now, we've just gone through the biggest business downturn in the industry's history, and we're hearing more and more about chip failures due to 130nm physical effects. Both physics and economics are a lot worse than we thought two years ago. Where are those simple, correct-by-construction methodologies for signal integrity, power integrity, low-power, etc. that we were promised? Were we bamboozled by glib promises from those Methodologists? In this session, we bring back the panelists from two years ago, not for another debate, but to hear well-reasoned perspectives on how to prioritize spending to address nanometer design challenges. Yes, methodology can solve any problem – but now we want to know which problems, in what priority order, at what cost. The panel will address the following questions. • What are the economic impacts and significance of the key nanometer design challenges, relative to each other? • Which nanometer design problems merit responsible R&D investment, in what amounts and proportion? • What is the likelihood of success, both near-term and longterm, in solving key nanometer design challenges? • Where will the answers come from? To keep the discussion very concrete, each panelist will be given a $100 budget, and must defend their allocation of this budget to attack various design problems. Where should the $100 be spent? The audience will determine the best-reasoned allocation, and the winning panelist keeps all the money.
Andrew B. Kahng, Shekhar Borkar, John M. Cohn, Antun Domic, Patrick Groeneveld, Louis K. Scheffer, Jean-Pierre Schoellkopf
DAC2
2003 Effectiveness and scaling trends of leakage control techniques for sub-130nm CMOS technologies
abstract
This paper compares the effectiveness of different leakage control techniques in deep submicron (DSM) bulk CMOS technologies. Simulations show that the 3-5x increase in IOFF/mm per generation is offsetting the savings in switching energy obtained from technology scaling. We compare both the transistor IOFF reduction and ION degradation due to each technique for the 130nm-70nm technologies. Our results indicate that the effectiveness of leakage control techniques and the associated energy vs. delay tradeoffs depend on the ratio of switching to leakage energies for a given technology. We use our findings to design a 70nm low power word line driver scheme for a 256 entry, 64-bit register file (RF). As a result, the leakage (total) energy of the word line drivers is reduced by 3x(2.5x) and for the RF by up to 35%(25%) respectively.
Bhaskar Chatterjee, Manoj Sachdev, Steven Hsu, Ram Krishnamurthy 0001, Shekhar Borkar
ISLPED5
2003 Exponential Challenges, Exponential Rewards - The future of Moore's Law
Shekhar Borkar
VLSI-SOC1
2002 Total power optimization by simultaneous dual-Vt allocation and device sizing in high performance microprocessors
abstract
We describe various design automation solutions for design migration to a dual-Vt process technology. We include the results of a Lagrangian Relaxation based tool, iSTATS, and a heuristic iterative optimization flow. Joint dual-Vt allocation and sizing reduces total power by 10+% compared with Vt allocation alone, and by 25+% compared with pure sizing methods. The heuristic flow requires 5x larger computation runtime than iSTATS due to its iterative nature.
Tanay Karnik, Yibin Ye, James W. Tschanz, Liqiong Wei, Steven M. Burns, Venkatesh Govindarajulu, Vivek De, Shekhar Borkar
DAC8
2002 Life is CMOS: why chase the life after?
abstract
This paper discusses potential solutions to the CMOS device technology scaling at gate lengths approaching 10 nm. Promising circuit and design techniques to control leakage power are described. Energy-efficient microarchitecture trends for general-purpose microprocessors are elucidated.
George Sery, Shekhar Borkar, Vivek De
DAC2
2002 Sub-90nm technologies: challenges and opportunities for CAD
abstract
Future high performance microprocessor design with technology scaling beyond 90nm will pose two major challenges: (1) energy and power, and (2) parameter variations. Design practice will have to change from deterministic design to probabilistic and statistical design. This paper discusses circuit techniques and design automation opportunities to overcome the challenges.
Tanay Karnik, Shekhar Borkar, Vivek De
ICCAD2
2002 Full-chip sub-threshold leakage power prediction model for sub-0.18 µm CMOS
abstract
The driving force for the semiconductor industry growth has been the elegant scaling nature of CMOS technology. In future CMOS technology generations, supply and threshold voltages will have to continually scale to sustain performance increase, control switching power dissipation, and maintain reliability. These continual scaling requirements on supply and threshold voltages pose several technology and circuit design challenges. With threshold voltage scaling sub-threshold leakage power is expected to become a significant portion of the total power in future CMOS systems. Therefore, it becomes crucial to predict sub-threshold leakage power of such systems. In this paper, we present a sub-threshold leakage power prediction model that takes into account within-die threshold voltage variation. Statistical measurements of 32-bit microprocessors in 0.18 mm CMOS confirms that the mean error of the model to be 4%. Comparisons of this model to two other existing models that do not take within-die threshold voltage variation into account are also presented.
Siva G. Narendra, Vivek De, Shekhar Borkar, Dimitri A. Antoniadis, Anantha P. Chandrakasan
ISLPED3
2002 Analysis of dual-VT SRAM cells with full-swing single-ended bit line sensing for on-chip cache
abstract
This paper compares different high-V/sub T/ and dual-V/sub T/ design choices for a large on-chip cache with single-ended sensing in a 0.13 /spl mu/m technology generation. The analysis shows that the best design is the one using a dual-V/sub T/ cell, with minimum channel length pass transistors, and low-V/sub T/ peripheral circuits. This dual-V/sub T/ circuit provides 20% performance gain with only 1.3/spl times/ larger active leakage power, and 2.4% larger cell area compared to the best design using high-V/sub T/ cells with nonminimum channel length pass transistors.
Fatih Hamzaoglu, Yibin Ye, Ali Keshavarzi, Kevin Zhang 0001, Siva G. Narendra, Shekhar Borkar, Mircea R. Stan, Vivek De
IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst.6
2001 Low power design challenges for the decade (invited talk)
abstract
Technology scaling will become difficult beyond 0.18 micron. For continued growth in performance, transistor density, and reduced energy per computation, circuit design will have to employ a new set of design techniques, with adequate design automation tools support. This paper discusses a few such techniques that reduce active and leakage power, and deliver higher performance. It concludes by pointing out some of the potential paradigm shifts.
Shekhar Borkar
ASP-DAC1
2001 Panel: Is Nanometer Design Under Control?
abstract
As fabrication technology moves to 100 nm and below, profound nanometer effects become critical in developing silicon chips with hundreds of millions of transistors. Both EDA suppliers and system houses have been re- tooling, and new methodologies have been emerging. Will these efforts meet the challenges of nanometer silicon such as performance closure, power, reliability, manufacturability, and cost? Which aspects of nanometer design are, or are not, under control? This session will consist of a debate between two teams of distinguished representatives from EDA suppliers and system design houses. Which side has the right answers and roadmap? You and a panel of judges will decide!
Andrew B. Kahng, Bing J. Sheu, Nancy Nettleton, John M. Cohn, Shekhar Borkar, Louis K. Scheffer, Ed Cheng, Sang Wang
DAC5
2001 Leakage control and tolerance challenges for sub-0.1µm microprocessor circuits
abstract
No abstract available.
Ram Krishnamurthy 0001, Mark A. Anders 0001, Krishnamurthy Soumyanath, Shekhar Borkar
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI4
2001 A low-leakage dynamic multi-ported register file in 0.13mm CMOS
abstract
Increasing leakage currents combined with reduced noise margins are seriously degrading the robustness of dynamic circuits. This paper describes a dynamic implementation of a 256/spl times/32b 4-read/write-port register-file for /spl sim/6 GHz operation at 1.2 V in a 0.13 /spl mu/m technology. The pre-charged local bit-lines utilize an efficient conditional keeper-technique, where a large fraction of the keeper is turned ON only if the dynamic output remains high in the evaluation phase. Using this technique, we are able to improve upon all-low-Vt performance by 4%, while maintaining dual-Vt usage. Thus, the robustness is improved by 96% and the active leakage power is reduced by 5/spl times/.
Atila Alvandpour, Ram Krishnamurthy 0001, Krishnamurthy Soumyanath, Shekhar Borkar
ISLPED4
2001 Effectiveness of reverse body bias for leakage control in scaled dual Vt CMOS ICs
abstract
Examines the effectiveness of opportunistic use of reverse body bias (RBB) to reduce leakage power during active operation, burn-in, and standby in 0.18 /spl mu/m single-V/sub t/ and 0.13 /spl mu/m dual-V/sub t/ logic process technologies. Investigates its dependencies on channel length, target V/sub t/, temperature and technology generation. Shows that RBB becomes less effective for leakage reduction at shorter channel lengths and lower V/sub t/ at both high and room temperatures, especially when target intrinsic leakage currents are high. RBB effectiveness also diminishes with technology scaling primarily because of worsening short-channel effects (SCE), particularly when target V/sub t/ values are low. A model is given that relates different transistor leakage components to full-chip leakage current, and is validated through test-chip measurements across a range of RBB values.
Ali Keshavarzi, Sean Ma, Siva G. Narendra, Brad Bloechel, K. Mistry, Tahir Ghani, Shekhar Borkar, Vivek De
ISLPED7
2001 Scaling of stack effect and its application for leakage reduction
abstract
Article Share on Scaling of stack effect and its application for leakage reduction Authors: Siva Narendra Microsystems Technology Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA and Microprocessor Research Laboratories, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR Microsystems Technology Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA and Microprocessor Research Laboratories, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, ORView Profile , Vivek De Microprocessor Research Laboratories, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR Microprocessor Research Laboratories, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, ORView Profile , Dimitri Antoniadis Microsystems Technology Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA Microsystems Technology Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAView Profile , Anantha Chandrakasan Microsystems Technology Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA Microsystems Technology Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAView Profile , Shekhar Borkar Microprocessor Research Laboratories, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR Microprocessor Research Laboratories, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, ORView Profile Authors Info & Claims ISLPED '01: Proceedings of the 2001 international symposium on Low power electronics and designAugust 2001 Pages 195–200https://doi.org/10.1145/383082.383132Online:06 August 2001Publication History 140citation1,436DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations140Total Downloads1,436Last 12 Months24Last 6 weeks3 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Siva G. Narendra, Vivek De, Dimitri A. Antoniadis, Anantha P. Chandrakasan, Shekhar Borkar
ISLPED5
2001 Comparative delay and energy of single edge-triggered & dual edge-triggered pulsed flip-flops for high-performance microprocessors
abstract
Article Comparative delay and energy of single edge-triggered & dual edge-triggered pulsed flip-flops for high-performance microprocessors Share on Authors: James Tschanz Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, OR Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, ORView Profile , Siva Narendra Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, OR Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, ORView Profile , Zhanping Chen Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, OR Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, ORView Profile , Shekhar Borkar Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, OR Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, ORView Profile , Manoj Sachdev Department of ECE, University of Waterloo, Canada Department of ECE, University of Waterloo, CanadaView Profile , Vivek De Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, OR Microprocessor Research Labs, Intel Corporation, 5350 N.E. Elam Young Parkway, Hillsboro, ORView Profile Authors Info & Claims ISLPED '01: Proceedings of the 2001 international symposium on Low power electronics and designAugust 2001 Pages 147–152https://doi.org/10.1145/383082.383121Online:06 August 2001Publication History 39citation804DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations39Total Downloads804Last 12 Months50Last 6 weeks2 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
James W. Tschanz, Siva G. Narendra, Zhanping Chen, Shekhar Borkar, Manoj Sachdev, Vivek De
ISLPED4
2000 Low power and high performance design challenges in future technologies
abstract
We discuss key barriers to continued scaling of supply voltage and technology for microprocessors to achieve low-power and high-performance. In particular, we focus on short-channel effects, device parameter variations, excessive subthreshold and gate oxide leakage, as the main obstacles dictated by fundamental device physics. Functionality of special circuits in the presence of high leakage, SRAM cell stability, bit line delay scaling, and power consumption in clocks & interconnects, will be the primary design challenges in the future. Soft error rate control and power delivery pose additional challenges. All of these problems are further compounded by the rapidly escalating complexity of microprocessor designs. The excessive leakage problem is particularly severe for battery-operated, high-performance microprocessors.
Vivek De, Shekhar Borkar
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI2
1999 Technology and design challenges for low power and high performance
abstract
Article Technology and design challenges for low power and high performance Share on Authors: Vivek De Intel Corporation, MicroComputer Research Labs, Hillsboro, OR Intel Corporation, MicroComputer Research Labs, Hillsboro, ORView Profile , Shekhar Borkar Intel Corporation, MicroComputer Research Labs, Hillsboro, OR Intel Corporation, MicroComputer Research Labs, Hillsboro, ORView Profile Authors Info & Claims ISLPED '99: Proceedings of the 1999 international symposium on Low power electronics and designAugust 1999 Pages 163–168https://doi.org/10.1145/313817.313908Online:17 August 1999Publication History 220citation2,087DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations220Total Downloads2,087Last 12 Months64Last 6 weeks10 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Vivek De, Shekhar Borkar
ISLPED2
1999 Technology scaling behavior of optimum reverse body bias for standby leakage power reduction in CMOS IC's
abstract
We demonstrate that, there is an optimum reverse body bias, unique to any technology generation, that minimizes the standby leakage power consumption of an IC design implemented in that technology.We also show: (1) the optimum reverse body bias value reduces by -2X per technology generation, and (2) the maximum achievable leakage power reduction by reverse body biasing diminishes by -4X per generation under constant field technology scaling scenario.Optimum point occurs as a result of reduction in subthreshold leakage and an increase in junction band-to-band tunneling leakage with applied reverse bias.Therefore, new junction engineering techniques to reduce the bulk band-toband tunneling leakage current component across the junction are needed to preserve the effectiveness of reverse body biasing for standby leakage control in future technologies.
Ali Keshavarzi, Siva G. Narendra, Shekhar Borkar, Charles F. Hawkins, Kaushik Roy 0001, Vivek De
ISLPED3
1990 Supporting Systolic and Memory Communciation in iWarp
abstract
iWarp is a parallel architecture developed jointly by Carnegie Mellon University and Intel Corporation. The iWarp communication system supports two widely used interprocessor communication styles: memory communication and systolic communication. This paper describes the rationale, architecture, and implementation for the iWarp communication system.
Shekhar Borkar, Robert S. Cohn, George W. Cox, Thomas R. Gross, H. T. Kung 0001, Monica S. Lam, Margie Levine, Brian Moore 0004, Wire Moore, Craig Peterson, Jim Susman, Jim Sutton, John Urbanski, Jon A. Webb
ISCA1
1988 Warp: an integrated solution of high-speed parallel computing
abstract
A description is given of the iWarp architecture and how it supports various communication models and system configurations. The heart of an iWarp system is the iWarp component: a single-chip processor that requires only the addition of memory chips to form a complete system building block, called the iWarp cell. Each iWarp component contains both a powerful computation engine that runs at 20 MFLOPS (million floating-point operations per second) and a high-throughput (320 Mb/s), low-latency (100-150-ns) communication engine for interfacing with other iWarp cells. Because of their strong computation and communication capabilities, the iWarp components provide a versatile building block for high-performance parallel systems ranging from special-purpose systolic arrays to general-purpose distributed memory computers. They can support both fine-grain parallel and coarse-grain distributed computation models simultaneously in the same system. The initial iWarp demonstration system consists of an 8*8 torus of iWarp cells, delivering more than 1.2 GFLOP (billions of FLOPS). It can be expanded to include up to 1024 cells.>
Shekhar Borkar, Robert S. Cohn, George W. Cox, Sha Gleason, Thomas R. Gross
SC1