Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert Givan

dblp:g/RobertGivan · also Bob Givan · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
33ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 23 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 5 · 3 first-authorComputer networks · 4Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
16 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% Reinforcement learning · 27% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Logic in computer science · 75% Computational complexity · 15% Automated reasoning and model checking · 10%

Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.132003
Equivalence notions and model minimization in Markov decision processes · Artif. Intell. 2003
Approximate Policy Iteration with a Policy Language Bias · NIPS 2003
Bounded-parameter Markov decision processes · Artif. Intell. 2000
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › search control
control knowledge learning
0.112008
Learning Control Knowledge for Forward Search Planning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
forward search planning
0.112008
Learning Control Knowledge for Forward Search Planning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.112008
Probabilistic Planning via Determinization in Hindsight · AAAI 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
heuristic search planning
0.112007
Using Learned Policies in Heuristic-Search Planning · IJCAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning
0.112006
Sequential inference with reliable observations: Learning to construct force-dynamic models · Artif. Intell. 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.112005
Simultaneous Heuristic Search for Conjunctive Subgoals · AAAI 2005
Logic in computer science › program analysis
set constraints
0.122002
Tarskian Set Constraints · Inf. Comput. 2002
Tarskian Set Constraints · LICS 1996
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model
0.012004
Relational sequential inference with reliable observations · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming › policy iteration
approximate policy iteration
0.012003
Approximate Policy Iteration with a Policy Language Bias · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming
policy iteration
0.012003
Approximate Policy Iteration with a Policy Language Bias · NIPS 2003
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning
0.012000
Online Ensemble Learning: An Empirical Study · ICML 2000
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › classical planning
STRIPS
0.011997
Model Minimization, Regression, and Propositional STRIPS Planning · IJCAI 1997
Computational complexity › decidability
decidability and complexity of logical theories
0.011996
Tarskian Set Constraints · LICS 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
first-order logic reasoning
0.021992
Natural Language Syntax and First-Order Inference · Artif. Intell. 1992
Taxonomic Syntax for First Order Inference · KR 1989
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video analytics
0.012004
Relational sequential inference with reliable observations · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
MDP abstraction
0.012003
Equivalence notions and model minimization in Markov decision processes · Artif. Intell. 2003
Automated reasoning and model checking › decision procedures
decidable fragments
0.011993
Taxonomic Syntax for First Order Inference · J. ACM 1993
Logic in computer science
first-order logic
0.011993
Taxonomic Syntax for First Order Inference · J. ACM 1993
Network performance modeling › stochastic analysis
stochastic fluid flow model
0.012001
Congestion Control via Online Sampling · INFOCOM 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.012000
Online Ensemble Learning: An Empirical Study · ICML 2000
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
robust MDP
0.012000
Bounded-parameter Markov decision processes · Artif. Intell. 2000
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language reasoning
0.011991
Natural Language Based Inference Procedures Applied to Schubert's Steamroller · AAAI 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
theorem proving
0.011991
Natural Language Based Inference Procedures Applied to Schubert's Steamroller · AAAI 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
automated reasoning
0.011989
Taxonomic Syntax for First Order Inference · KR 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heuristic search · 0.1machine learning for planning · 0.1determinization · 0.1policy learning · 0.1ensemble methods · 0.1state-inference function learning · 0.0sequential inference · 0.0policy language bias · 0.0model minimization · 0.0bisimulation · 0.0online sampling · 0.0markov decision process · 0.0hindsight optimization · 0.0nondeterministic doubly exponential time complexity analysis · 0.0socratic proof system · 0.0taxonomic syntax · 0.0first-order logic · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Stochastic Enforced Hill-Climbing
Jia-Hong Wu, Rajesh Kalyanam, Robert Givan
J. Artif. Intell. Res.3
2010 Automatic Induction of Bellman-Error Features for Probabilistic Planning
abstract
Domain-specific features are important in representing problem structure throughout machine learning and decision-theoretic planning. In planning, once state features are provided, domain-independent algorithms such as approximate value iteration can learn weighted combinations of those features that often perform well as heuristic estimates of state value (e.g., distance to the goal). Successful applications in real-world domains often require features crafted by human experts. Here, we propose automatic processes for learning useful domain-specific feature sets with little or no human intervention. Our methods select and add features that describe state-space regions of high inconsistency in the Bellman equation (statewise Bellman error) during approximate value iteration. Our method can be applied using any real-valued-feature hypothesis space and corresponding learning method for selecting features from training sets of state-value pairs. We evaluate the method with hypothesis spaces defined by both relational and propositional feature languages, using nine probabilistic planning domains. We show that approximate value iteration using a relational feature space performs at the state-of-the-art in domain-independent stochastic relational planning. Our method provides the first domain-independent approach that plays Tetris successfully (without human-engineered features).
Jia-Hong Wu, Robert Givan
J. Artif. Intell. Res.2
2008 Probabilistic Planning via Determinization in Hindsight
Alan Fern, Robert Givan, Subbarao Kambhampati
AAAI3
2008 Learning Control Knowledge for Forward Search Planning
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2007 Using Learned Policies in Heuristic-Search Planning
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
IJCAI3
2006 Sequential inference with reliable observations: Learning to construct force-dynamic models
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
Artif. Intell.2
2006 Predictive buffer control in delivering remotely stored video using proxy servers
Edwin K. P. Chong, Robert Givan
Comput. Networks3
2006 Approximate Policy Iteration with a Policy Language Bias: Solving Relational Markov Decision Processes
abstract
We study an approach to policy selection for large relational Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We consider a variant of approximate policy iteration (API) that replaces the usual value-function learning step with a learning step in policy space. This is advantageous in domains where good policies are easier to represent and learn than the corresponding value functions, which is often the case for the relational MDPs we are interested in. In order to apply API to such problems, we introduce a relational policy language and corresponding learner. In addition, we introduce a new bootstrapping routine for goal-based planning domains, based on random walks. Such bootstrapping is necessary for many large relational MDPs, where reward is extremely sparse, as API is ineffective in such domains when initialized with an uninformed policy. Our experiments show that the resulting system is able to find good policies for a number of classical planning domains and their stochastic variants by solving them as extremely large relational MDPs. The experiments also point to some limitations of our approach, suggesting future work.
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
J. Artif. Intell. Res.3
2006 Dynamic feature selection for hardware prediction
Alan Fern, Robert Givan, Babak Falsafi, T. N. Vijaykumar
J. Syst. Archit.2
2005 Learning Measures of Progress for Planning Domains
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
AAAI3
2005 Simultaneous Heuristic Search for Conjunctive Subgoals
Robert Givan
AAAI2
2004 Relational sequential inference with reliable observations
abstract
We present a trainable sequential-inference technique for large relational problems. Our method assumes "reliable observations", i.e., that each state persists long enough to be reliably inferred from the observations it generates. We learn the resulting "state-inference function" (from observation sequences to underlying hidden states) and develop a heuristic sequential-inference method utilizing the learned function. Empirical results, in relational video interpretation, show significant improvement on both the accuracy and the speed of a variety of recent systems.
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
ICML2
2004 Online pricing for bandwidth provisioning in multi-class networks
Uday Savagaonkar, Edwin K. P. Chong, Robert Givan
Comput. Networks3
2003 Buffer control at video-streaming proxy
abstract
Proxy servers can be used to stream video stored at a geographically separate location. This separation between the proxy server and the storage introduces a non-negligible delay in retrieving video frames in real time. We develop an effective scheme to achieve consistent, high streaming quality under such delays. Central to the scheme is the control of buffer occupancy at the proxy server. We model the buffer as a bilinear dynamical system disturbed by a point process with stochastic state-dependent intensity, reflecting the behavior of an additive-increase/multiplicative-decrease transport protocol. Using the buffer model, we construct two controllers based on prediction of future system states, taking into account both the delay and the state-dependent disturbance. Our empirical study illustrates the effectiveness of the scheme and shows that the controllers exploiting the buffer model perform well in overcoming the adverse impact of the retrieval delay.
Edwin K. P. Chong, Robert Givan
GLOBECOM3
2003 Approximate Policy Iteration with a Policy Language Bias
abstract
We explore approximate policy iteration, replacing the usual cost- function learning step with a learning step in policy space. We give policy-language biases that enable solution of very large relational Markov decision processes (MDPs) that no previous technique can solve. In particular, we induce high-quality domain-specific planners for clas- sical planning domains (both deterministic and stochastic variants) by solving such domains as extremely large MDPs.
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
NIPS3
2003 Equivalence notions and model minimization in Markov decision processes
Robert Givan, Thomas L. Dean, Matthew Greig
Artif. Intell.1
2003 Online Ensemble Learning: An Empirical Study
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
Mach. Learn.2
2002 Inductive Policy Selection for First-Order MDPs
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
UAI3
2002 Tarskian Set Constraints
Robert Givan, David A. McAllester, Carl Witty, Dexter Kozen
Inf. Comput.1
2002 Specific-to-General Learning for Temporal Events with Application to Learning Event Definitions from Video
abstract
We develop, analyze, and evaluate a novel, supervised, specific-to-general learner for a simple temporal logic and use the resulting algorithm to learn visual event definitions from video sequences. First, we introduce a simple, propositional, temporal, event-description language called AMA that is sufficiently expressive to represent many events yet sufficiently restrictive to support learning. We then give algorithms, along with lower and upper complexity bounds, for the subsumption and generalization problems for AMA formulas. We present a positive-examples--only specific-to-general learning method based on these algorithms. We also present a polynomial-time--computable ``syntactic'' subsumption test that implies semantic subsumption without being equivalent to it. A generalization algorithm based on syntactic subsumption can be used in place of semantic generalization to improve the asymptotic complexity of the resulting learning algorithm. Finally, we apply this algorithm to the task of learning relational event definitions from video and show that it yields definitions that are competitive with hand-coded ones.
Alan Fern, Robert Givan, Jeffrey Mark Siskind
J. Artif. Intell. Res.2
2002 Polynomial-time computation via local inference relations
abstract
We consider the concept of alocalset of inference rules. A local rule set can be automatically transformed into a rule set for which bottom-up evaluation terminates in polynomial time. The local-rule-set transformation gives polynomial-time evaluation strategies for a large variety of rule sets that cannot be given terminating evaluation strategies by any other known automatic technique. This article discusses three new results. First, it is shown that every polynomial-time predicate can be defined by an (unstratified) local rule set. Second, a new machine-recognizable subclass of the local rule sets is identified. Finally, we show that locality, as a property of rule sets, is undecidable in general.
Robert Givan, David A. McAllester
ACM Trans. Comput. Log.1
2001 Congestion Control via Online Sampling
abstract
We consider the congestion control problem in a communication network with multiple traffic sources, each modeled as a fully-controllable stream of fluid traffic. The controlled traffic shares a common bottleneck node with high-priority cross traffic described by a Markov-modulated fluid (MMF). Each controlled source is assumed to have a unique round-trip delay. We wish to maximize a linear combination of the throughput, delay, traffic loss rate, and a fairness metric at the bottleneck node. We introduce an online sampling-based burst-level congestion control scheme capable of performing effectively under rapidly-varying cross traffic by making explicit use of the provided MMF model of that variation. The control problem is posed as a finite-horizon Markov decision process and is solved heuristically using a technique called hindsight optimization. We provide a detailed derivation of our congestion control algorithm based on this technique. The distinguishing feature of our scheme relative to conventional congestion control schemes is that we exploit a stochastic model of the cross traffic. Our empirical study shows that our control scheme significantly outperforms the conventional proportional-derivative (PD) controller, achieving higher utilization, lower delay, and lower loss under reasonable fairness. The performance advantage of our scheme over the PD scheme grows as the rate variance of cross traffic increases, underscoring the effectiveness of our control scheme under variable cross traffic.
Edwin K. P. Chong, Robert Givan
INFOCOM3
2000 Online Ensemble Learning: An Empirical Study
Alan Fern, Robert Givan
ICML2
2000 Bounded-parameter Markov decision processes
Robert Givan, Sonia M. Leach, Thomas L. Dean
Artif. Intell.1
1997 Model Minimization, Regression, and Propositional STRIPS Planning
Robert Givan, Thomas L. Dean
IJCAI1
1997 Model Reduction Techniques for Computing Approximately Optimal Solutions for Markov Decision Processes
Thomas L. Dean, Robert Givan, Sonia M. Leach
UAI2
1996 Tarskian Set Constraints
abstract
We investigate set constraints over set expressions with Tarskian functional and relational operations. Unlike the Herbrand constructor symbols used in recent set constraint formalisms, the meaning of a Tarskian function symbol is interpreted in an arbitrary first order structure. We show that satisfiability of Tarskian set constraints is decidable in nondeterministic doubly exponential time. We also give complexity results and open problems for various extensions of the language.
David A. McAllester, Robert Givan, Carl Witty, Dexter Kozen
LICS2
1996 Inferring Program Specifications in Polynomial-Time
Robert Givan
SAS1
1993 Taxonomic Syntax for First Order Inference
abstract
A new polynomial time decidable fragment of first order logic is identified, and a general method for using polynomial time inference procedures in knowledge representation systems is presented. The results shown in this paper indicate that a nonstandard “taxonomic” syntax is essential in constructing natural and powerful polynomial time inference procedures. The central role of taxonomic syntax in the polynomial time inference procedures provides technical support for the often-expressed intuition that knowledge is better represented in terms of taxonomic relationships than classical first order formulas. To use the procedures in a knowledge representation system, a “Socratic proof system” is defined, which is complete for first order inference and which can be used as a semi-automated interface to a first order knowledge base.
David A. McAllester, Robert Givan
J. ACM2
1992 New Results on Local Inference Relations
Robert Givan, David A. McAllester
KR1
1992 Natural Language Syntax and First-Order Inference
David A. McAllester, Robert Givan
Artif. Intell.2
1991 Natural Language Based Inference Procedures Applied to Schubert's Steamroller
Robert Givan, David A. McAllester, Sameer Shalaby
AAAI1
1989 Taxonomic Syntax for First Order Inference
David A. McAllester, Robert Givan, Tanveer Fatima
KR2