Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sue Harding

dblp:h/SueHarding · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
missing data
0.112006
Mask estimation for missing data speech recognition based on statistics of binaural interaction · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition
robust speech recognition
0.112006
Mask estimation for missing data speech recognition based on statistics of binaural interaction · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing › spatial audio
binaural processing
0.012006
Mask estimation for missing data speech recognition based on statistics of binaural interaction · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing
computational auditory scene analysis
0.012006
Mask estimation for missing data speech recognition based on statistics of binaural interaction · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interaural time difference · 0.1interaural level difference · 0.1probability distributions · 0.1probability distribution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Speech Separation Based on The Statistics of Binaural Auditory Features
abstract
A computational auditory scene analysis (CASA) system is described, in which sound separation according to spatial location is combined with the 'missing data' approach for automatic speech recognition. Time-frequency masks for the missing data recognizer are derived from the statistics of interaural time and level differences; these masks identify acoustic features that constitute reliable evidence of the target speech signal. It is demonstrated that this approach yields good performance in a challenging environment, in which a target voice is contaminated by another talker and reverberation. The ability of the system to generalize to source-receiver configurations that were not encountered during training is discussed
Guy J. Brown, Sue Harding, Jon Barker
ICASSP (5)2
2006 Mask estimation for missing data speech recognition based on statistics of binaural interaction
abstract
This paper describes a perceptually motivated computational auditory scene analysis (CASA) system that combines sound separation according to spatial location with the "missing data" approach for robust speech recognition in noise. Missing data time-frequency masks are created using probability distributions based on estimates of interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILD) for mixed utterances in reverberated conditions; these masks indicate which regions of the spectrum constitute reliable evidence of the target speech signal. A number of experiments compare the relative efficacy of the binaural cues when used individually and in combination. We also investigate the ability of the system to generalize to acoustic conditions not encountered during training. Performance on a continuous digit recognition task using this method is found to be good, even in a particularly challenging environment with three concurrent male talkers.
Sue Harding, Jon Barker, Guy J. Brown
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
2005 Mask Estimation Based on Sound Localisation for Missing Data Speech Recognition
abstract
This paper describes a perceptually motivated computational auditory scene analysis (CASA) system that combines sound separation according to spatial location with 'missing data' techniques for robust speech recognition in noise. Missing data time-frequency masks are produced using cross-correlation to estimate interaural time difference (ITD) and hence spatial azimuth; this is used to determine which regions of the signal constitute reliable evidence of the target speech signal. Three experiments are performed that compare the effects of different reverberation surfaces, localisation methods and azimuth separations on recognition accuracy, together with the effects of two post-processing techniques (morphological operations and supervised learning) for improving mask estimation. Both post-processing techniques greatly improve performance; the best performance occurs using a learned mapping.
Sue Harding, Jon Barker, Guy J. Brown
ICASSP (1)1
2005 Binaural feature selection for missing data speech recognition
abstract
The ‘missing data ’ approach for robust speech recognition uses masks indicating which regions of an acoustic mixture provide reliable evidence of the target to be recognised. Binaural cues for spatial location were used to determine missing data masks for signals consisting of utterances from three concurrent male speakers in reverberant conditions, by deriving probability distributions from estimates of interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILD) for the mixed signals. In such a system, a decision must be made about whether the acoustic features used for decoding are selected from the left or right ear, or a combination of the two. Here, features were selected from the “better ear ” (as determined by a simple heuristic) within whole time frames, or within individual time-frequency elements. A combination of left and right ear features gave better recognition performance than using either ear alone, and the best results were obtained when selecting features within individual time-frequency elements. 1.
Sue Harding, Jon Barker, Guy J. Brown
INTERSPEECH1
2003 Multi-resolution auditory scene analysis: robust speech recognition using pattern-matching from a noisy signal
abstract
Abstract Unlike automatic speech recognition systems, humans canunderstand speech when other competing sounds are presentAlthough the theory of auditory scene analysis (ASA)may helpto explain this ability, some perceptual experiments show fu-sion of the speech signal under circumstances in which ASAprinciples might be expected to cause segregation. We pro-pose a model of multi-resolution ASA that uses both high- andlow- resolution representations of the auditory signal in paral-lel in order to resolve this conflict. The use of parallel repre-sentationsreduces variabilityforpattern-matching whileretain-ing the ability to identify and segregate low-level features ofthe signal. An important feature of the model is the assump-tion that features of the auditory signal are fused together un-less there is good reason to segregate them. Speech is recog-nised by matching the low-resolution representation to previ-ously learned speech templates without prior segregation of thesignal into separate perceptual streams; this contrasts with theappr oach gener a l l y used by comput at i onal m odels of A S A . Wedescribe an implementation of the multi-resolution model, us-ing hidden Markov models, that illustrates the feasibility ofthis approach and achieves much higher identification perfor-mance than standard techniques used for computer recognitionof speech mixed with other sounds.
Sue Harding, Georg F. Meyer
INTERSPEECH1
2003 Changes in the perception of synthetic nasal consonants as a result of vowel formant manipulations
Sue Harding, Georg F. Meyer
Speech Commun.1
2001 A case for multi-resolution auditory scene analysis
abstract
A commonly held view of auditory scene analysis is that complex auditory environments are segregated into separate perceptual streams using primitive cues that can be attended to separately. We argue that this view is inconsistent with the majority of perceptual data reported in the literature and propose an alternative model that is based on a primary, low resolution signal representation used in a passive pattern matching stage, augmented by secondary, high resolution representations that can be used in an active pattern matching stage to formulate hypotheses about the auditory scene.
Sue Harding, Georg F. Meyer
INTERSPEECH1