Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Kent

dblp:k/WilliamKent · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
14as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 15 · 13 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
13 papers
Data models and query languages · 33% Data integration and cleaning · 31% Database theory · 12%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages
object-oriented database
0.031991
The Iris Database System · SIGMOD Conference 1990
Iris: An Object-Oriented Database Management System · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1987
Solving Domain Mismatch and Schema Mismatch Problems with an Object-Oriented Database Programming Language · VLDB 1991
Data integration and cleaning › interoperability
database interoperability
0.011991
Language Features for Interoperability of Databases with Schematic Discrepancies · SIGMOD Conference 1991
Machine learning and data management › distribution shift
domain shift
0.011991
Solving Domain Mismatch and Schema Mismatch Problems with an Object-Oriented Database Programming Language · VLDB 1991
Data integration and cleaning
schema integration
0.011991
Language Features for Interoperability of Databases with Schematic Discrepancies · SIGMOD Conference 1991
Data integration and cleaning
schema matching
0.011991
Solving Domain Mismatch and Schema Mismatch Problems with an Object-Oriented Database Programming Language · VLDB 1991
Transaction processing and concurrency control
versioning
0.011989
An Overview of the Versioning Problem · SIGMOD Conference 1989
Data models and query languages › relational model
universal relation
0.011983
The Universal Relation Revisited · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1983
Database system architecture and tuning
database design
0.011981
Consequences of Assuming a Universal Relation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1981
Database theory
dependency theory
0.011981
Consequences of Assuming a Universal Relation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1981
Data models and query languages
object-oriented data model
0.011990
The Iris Database System · SIGMOD Conference 1990
Database theory › database design theory
universal relation assumption
0.011981
Consequences of Assuming a Universal Relation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1981
Data models and query languages › conceptual modeling
conceptual schema
0.011980
Splitting the Conceptual Schema · VLDB 1980
Database theory
schema decomposition
0.011980
Splitting the Conceptual Schema · VLDB 1980
Query processing and optimization
join processing
0.011979
The Entity Join · VLDB 1979
Data models and query languages
conceptual modeling
0.011976
New Criteria for the Conceptual Model · VLDB 1976
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Language Features for Interoperability of Databases with Schematic Discrepancies
Ravi Krishnamurthy, Witold Litwin, William Kent
SIGMOD Conference3
1991 Solving Domain Mismatch and Schema Mismatch Problems with an Object-Oriented Database Programming Language
William Kent
VLDB1
1990 The Iris Database System
abstract
Iris is an object-oriented database management system being developed at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories [1], [3]. This videotape provides an overview of the Iris data model and a summary of our experiences in converting a computer-integrated manufacturing application to Iris. An abstract of the videotape follows.
William Kent, Peter Lyngbæk, Samir Mathur, Kevin Wilkinson
SIGMOD Conference1
1989 The Leading Edge of Database Technology
William Kent
ER1
1989 An Overview of the Versioning Problem
William Kent
SIGMOD Conference1
1987 Iris: An Object-Oriented Database Management System
Daniel H. Fishman, David Beech, H. P. Cate, E. C. Chow, Tim Connors, J. W. Davis, Nigel Derrett, C. G. Hoch, William Kent, Peter Lyngbæk, Brom Mahbod, Marie-Anne Neimat, Thomas A. Ryan Jr., Ming-Chien Shan
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.9
1984 Fact-based data analysis and design
William Kent
J. Syst. Softw.1
1983 Fact-Based Data Analysis and Design
William Kent
ER1
1983 The Universal Relation Revisited
abstract
Cl History.The universal relation (UR) concept emerged in the late 1970s as a branch of relational database theory, but was substantially different in character.The hallmark of relational theory is rigor.The objects of that theory are
William Kent
ACM Trans. Database Syst.1
1982 Choices in Practical Data Design
William Kent
VLDB1
1981 Data Model Theory Meets a Practical Application
William Kent
VLDB1
1981 Consequences of Assuming a Universal Relation
abstract
Although central to the current direction of dependency theory, the assumption of a universal relation is incompatible with some aspects of relational database theory and practice. Furthermore, the universal relation is itself ill defined in some important ways. And, under the universal relation assumption, the decomposition approach to database design becomes virtually indistinguishable from the synthetic approach.
William Kent
ACM Trans. Database Syst.1
1980 Splitting the Conceptual Schema
William Kent
VLDB1
1979 The Entity Join
William Kent
VLDB1
1979 Limitations of Record-Based Information Models
abstract
Record structures are generally efficient, familiar, and easy to use for most current data processing applications. But they are not complete in their ability to represent information, nor are they fully self-describing.
William Kent
ACM Trans. Database Syst.1
1976 New Criteria for the Conceptual Model
William Kent
VLDB1