Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jing Li 0036
dblp:l/JingLi36
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7940-5582ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 28% Distributed systems · 28% Cloud and datacenter computing · 22% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 37% Image recognition and object detection · 32% Segmentation and scene understanding · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding
document layout analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | M6Doc: A Large-Scale Multi-Format, Multi-Type, Multi-Layout, Multi-Language, Multi-Annotation Category Dataset for Modern Document Layout Analysis · CVPR 2023 |
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis
document understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | M6Doc: A Large-Scale Multi-Format, Multi-Type, Multi-Layout, Multi-Language, Multi-Annotation Category Dataset for Modern Document Layout Analysis · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene text spotting |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SPTS: Single-Point Text Spotting · ACM Multimedia 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Reliability Equations for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2020 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
proactive fault tolerance |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Reliability Equations for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2020 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Reliability Equations for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2020 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Reliability Equations for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | M6Doc: A Large-Scale Multi-Format, Multi-Type, Multi-Layout, Multi-Language, Multi-Annotation Category Dataset for Modern Document Layout Analysis · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
autoregressive sequence generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | SPTS: Single-Point Text Spotting · ACM Multimedia 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
discrete token prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | SPTS: Single-Point Text Spotting · ACM Multimedia 2022 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Reliability Equations for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2020 |
Storage systems › storage reliability
RAID |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Reliability Equations for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.9query embedding · 1.3adaptive element matching · 1.3autoregressive decoding · 0.6weibull distribution · 0.4monte carlo simulation · 0.4closed-form equations · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Prefix-WGAN: Data Augmentation for Memory Failure Prediction
Jianli Ding, Guohao Chao, Jing Li 0036 |
KSEM (4) | 3 |
| 2025 | Data-loss models for proactive-tolerance Reed-Solomon storage systems
Jing Li 0036, Zhenrui Zhou, Jianli Ding |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 2023 | M6Doc: A Large-Scale Multi-Format, Multi-Type, Multi-Layout, Multi-Language, Multi-Annotation Category Dataset for Modern Document Layout AnalysisabstractDocument layout analysis is a crucial prerequisite for document understanding, including document retrieval and conversion. Most public datasets currently contain only PDF documents and lack realistic documents. Models trained on these datasets may not generalize well to real-world scenarios. Therefore, this paper introduces a large and diverse document layout analysis dataset called M6Doc. The M6 designation represents six properties: (1) Multi-Format (including scanned, photographed, and PDF documents); (2) Multi-Type (such as scientific articles, textbooks, books, test papers, magazines, newspapers, and notes); (3) Multi-Layout (rectangular, Manhattan, non-Manhattan, and multi-column Manhattan); (4) Multi-Language (Chinese and English); (5) Multi-Annotation Category (74 types of annotation labels with 237,116 annotation instances in 9,080 manually annotated pages); and (6) Modern documents. Additionally, we propose a transformer-based document layout analysis method called TransDLANet, which leverages an adaptive element matching mechanism that enables query embedding to better match ground truth to improve recall, and constructs a segmentation branch for more precise document image instance segmentation. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of M6Doc with various layout analysis methods and demonstrate its effectiveness. TransDLANet achieves state-of-the-art performance on M6 Doc with 64.5% mAP. The M6Doc dataset will be available at https://github.com/HcIILAB/M6Doc. Hiuyi Cheng, Peirong Zhang 0001, Sihang Wu, Jiaxin Zhang 0003, Qiyuan Zhu, Zecheng Xie, Jing Li 0036, Kai Ding 0009 |
CVPR | 7 |
| 2022 | SPTS: Single-Point Text SpottingabstractExisting scene text spotting (i.e., end-to-end text detection and recognition) methods rely on costly bounding box annotations (e.g., text-line, word-level, or character-level bounding boxes). For the first time, we demonstrate that training scene text spotting models can be achieved with an extremely low-cost annotation of a single-point for each instance. We propose an end-to-end scene text spotting method that tackles scene text spotting as a sequence prediction task. Given an image as input, we formulate the desired detection and recognition results as a sequence of discrete tokens and use an auto-regressive Transformer to predict the sequence. The proposed method is simple yet effective, which can achieve state-of-the-art results on widely used benchmarks. Most significantly, we show that the performance is not very sensitive to the positions of the point annotation, meaning that it can be much easier to be annotated or even be automatically generated than the bounding box that requires precise positions. We believe that such a pioneer attempt indicates a significant opportunity for scene text spotting applications of a much larger scale than previously possible. The code is available at https://github.com/shannanyinxiang/SPTS. Dezhi Peng, Xinyu Wang 0010, Jiaxin Zhang 0003, Mingxin Huang, Songxuan Lai, Jing Li 0036, Shenggao Zhu, Dahua Lin, Chunhua Shen, Xiang Bai |
ACM Multimedia | 7 |
| 2022 | Random Versus Copyset Placement: Data-Loss Models for Proactive-Tolerance Replica-Based Data StorageabstractIn a distributed storage system, proactive fault tolerance is used to provide an extra layer of data protection over traditional reactive fault tolerance. The placement of replicas across storage servers in a replication-based system affects both rebuild times and the vulnerability of data to device failures, and therefore influences system reliability. The effects of proactive fault tolerance and data placement on the reliability of distributed storage systems are intricate and understudied. This article proposes reliability equations for predicting the number of data loss in proactive replication-based systems using random and copyset placement schemes, over a period of time. The reliability equations represent the effect of proactive fault tolerance, disk-operation failures, server-operation failures, rebuild bandwidths, and replica placement schemes upon the systems reliability, and take time-based Weibull distributions to model failure and repair processes. Moreover, a Monte-Carlo based method is designed to simulate the operation of proactive distributed storage systems. The results of the reliability equations are in good accord with those of the simulations, which verifies the correctness of the equations. The proposed equations can help system designers readily optimize tradeoffs and compare schemes, facilitating distributed storage systems design. Jing Li 0036, Rebecca J. Stones, Jinfei Luo |
IEEE Trans. Reliab. | 1 |
| 2020 | Reliability Equations for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault ToleranceabstractAs cloud storage systems increase in scale, hard drive failures are becoming more frequent, which raises reliability issues. In addition to traditional reactive fault tolerance, proactive fault tolerance is used to improve a system's reliability. However, there are few studies which analyze the reliability of proactive cloud storage systems, and they typically assume an exponential distribution for drive failures. This paper presents closed-form equations for estimating the number of data-loss events in proactive cloud storage systems using RAID-5, RAID-6, 2-way replication, and 3-way replication mechanisms, within a given time period. The equations model the impact of proactive fault tolerance, operational failures, failure restorations, latent block defects, and drive scrubbing on the systems reliability, and use time-based Weibull distributions to represent processes (instead of homogeneous Poisson processes). We also design a Monte-Carlo simulation method to simulate the running of proactive cloud storage systems. The proposed equations closely match time-consuming Monte-Carlo simulations, using parameters obtained from the analysis of field data. These equations allow designers to efficiently estimate system reliability under varying parameters, facilitating cloud storage system design. Jing Li 0036, Peng Li 0026, Rebecca J. Stones, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 1 |
| 2018 | Load Prediction for Data Centers Based on Database ServiceabstractIn the era of cloud computing, the over-occupancy of data center resources (CPU, memory, disk) and subsequent machine failure have resulted in great loss to users and enterprises. So it makes sense to anticipate the server workload in advance. Previous research on server workloads has focused on trend analysis and time series fitting. We propose an approach to forecast the workloads of servers based on machine learning. And our data comes from a database-based data center that is real, large-scale, and enterprise-class. We use the servers' historical monitoring data for our models to predict future workloads and hence provide the ability to automatically warn overload and reallocate resources. We calculate the failure detection rate and false alarm rate of our overload detection models, as well as put forward an evaluation based on the overload processing cost. Experimental results show that machine learning methods especially Random Forest can better predict the server load than traditional time series analysis method. We use the forecast results to propose some scheduling strategies to prevent server overload, achieve intelligent operation and maintenance, and failure prediction. Compared with the traditional time series analysis method, our method uses less data and lower dimensions, and yields more accurate predictions. Zhaoyang Yu 0003, Trent Marbach, Jing Li 0036, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001 |
COMPSAC (1) | 4 |
| 2016 | ProCode: A Proactive Erasure Coding Scheme for Cloud Storage SystemsabstractCommon distributed storage systems use data replication to improve system reliability and maintain data availability, but at the cost of disk storage. In order to lower storage costs, data may instead be stored according to erasure codes, but this results in greater network and disk traffic when data blocks are reconstructed following an erasure. These methods are also passive, i.e., they only reconstruct data after failures occur. In this paper, we present a proactive erasure coding scheme (ProCode). We monitor the health of disks via drive failure prediction and automatically adjust the replication factor of data blocks on at-risk disks to ensure data safety. In this way, we achieve fast recovery after disk failures without significantly increasing the storage overhead. ProCode is implemented as an extension to HDFS-RAID used by Facebook. Compared with replication storage and erasure coding, ProCode improves system reliability and availability. Specifically, experimental results show 2 or more orders of magnitude reduction in the average number of data loss events over a 10- year period, a 63% or greater drop in degraded read latency, and a 78% drop in recovery time. Peng Li 0026, Jing Li 0036, Rebecca J. Stones, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001 |
SRDS | 2 |
| 2016 | Being Accurate Is Not Enough: New Metrics for Disk Failure PredictionabstractTraditionally, disk failure prediction accuracy is used to evaluate disk failure prediction model. However, accuracy may not reflect their practical usage (protecting against failures, rather than only predicting failures) in cloud storage systems. In this paper, we propose two new metrics for disk failure prediction models: migration rate, which measures how much at-risk data is protected as a result of correct failure predictions, and mismigration rate, which measures how much data is migrated needlessly as a result of false failure predictions. To demonstrate their effectiveness, we compare disk failure prediction methods: (a) a classification tree (CT) model vs. a state-of-the-art recurrent neural network (RNN) model, and (b) a proposed residual life prediction model based on gradient boosted regression trees (GBRTs) vs. RNN. While prediction accuracy experiments favor the RNN model, migration rate experiments can favor the CT and GBRT models (depending on transfer rates). We conclude that prediction accuracy can be a misleading metric. Moreover, the proposed GBRT model offers a practical improvement in disk failure prediction in real-world data centers. Jing Li 0036, Rebecca J. Stones, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001, Kang Xiao |
SRDS | 1 |
| 2015 | Global Reliability Evaluation for Cloud Storage Systems with Proactive Fault Tolerance
Jing Li 0036, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001, Huijun Tang |
ICA3PP (4) | 1 |
| 2014 | Hard Drive Failure Prediction Using Classification and Regression TreesabstractSome statistical and machine learning methods have been proposed to build hard drive prediction models based on the SMART attributes, and have achieved good prediction performance. However, these models were not evaluated in the way as they are used in real-world data centers. Moreover, the hard drives deteriorate gradually, but these models can not describe this gradual change precisely. This paper proposes new hard drive failure prediction models based on Classification and Regression Trees, which perform better in prediction performance as well as stability and interpretability compared with the state-of the-art model, the Back propagation artificial neural network model. Experiments demonstrate that the Classification Tree (CT) model predicts over 95% of failures at a false alarm rate (FAR) under 0.1% on a real-world dataset containing 25,792 drives. Aiming at the practical application of prediction models, we test them with different drive families, with fewer number of drives, and with different model updating strategies. The CT model still shows steady and good performance. We propose a health degree model based on Regression Tree (RT) as well, which can give the drive a health assessment rather than a simple classification result. Therefore, the approach can deal with warnings raised by the prediction model in order of their health degrees. We implement a reliability model for RAID-6 systems with proactive fault tolerance and show that our CT model can significantly improve the reliability and/or reduce construction and maintenance cost of large-scale storage systems. Jing Li 0036, Xinpu Ji, Yuhan Jia, Bingpeng Zhu, Gang Wang 0001, Xiaoguang Liu 0001 |
DSN | 1 |