Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Reagle

dblp:r/JosephReagle · also Joseph M. Reagle, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0650-9097ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 72% Usable security · 28%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › consumer privacy
privacy in e-commerce
0.011999
Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences · EC 1999
Privacy and data protection
privacy preferences
0.011999
Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences · EC 1999
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
p3p
0.011999
Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences · EC 1999
Privacy and data protection
privacy-enhancing technologies
0.011999
Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences · EC 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.0survey · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 'There Has To Be a Lot That We're Missing': Moderating AI-Generated Content on Reddit
abstract
Generative AI is altering how we work, learn, communicate, and participate in online communities. How might online communities be changed by generative AI? To start addressing this question, we focused on online community moderators' experiences with AI-generated content (AIGC). We performed fifteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews with moderators of Reddit communities that restrict the use of AIGC. Our study finds that rules about AIGC are motivated by concerns about content quality, social dynamics, and governance challenges. Moderators fear that, without such rules, AIGC threatens to reduce their communities' utility and social value. We find that, despite the absence of robust tools for detecting AIGC, moderators were able to somewhat limit the disruption it caused by working with their communities to clarify norms. However, moderators found enforcing AIGC restrictions challenging, as they rely on time-intensive and inaccurate detection heuristics. Our results highlight the importance of supporting community autonomy and self-determination in the face of this sudden technological change, and suggest potential design solutions that may help.
Travis Lloyd, Joseph Reagle, Mor Naaman
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.2
2023 Towards Effective Paraphrasing for Information Disguise
Anmol Agarwal, Shrey Gupta, Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri, Manas Gaur, Joseph Reagle, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
ECIR (2)5
1999 Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences
abstract
Privacy is a necessary concern in electronic commerce.It is difficult, if not impossible, to complete a transaction without revealing some personal data -a shipping address, billing information, or product preference.Users may be unwilling to provide this necessary information or even to browse online if they believe their privacy is invaded or threatened.Fortunately, there are technologies to help users protect their privacy.P3P (Platform for Privacy Preferences Project) from the World Wide Web Consortium is one such technology.However, there is a need to know more about the range of user concerns and preferences about privacy in order to build usable and effective interface mechanisms for P3P and other privacy technologies.Accordingly, we conducted a survey of 381 U.S. Net users, detailing a range of commerce scenarios and examining the participants' concerns and preferences about privacy.This paper presents both the findings from that study as well as their design implications.
Mark S. Ackerman, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Joseph Reagle
EC3