Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Udi Rotics

dblp:r/UdiRotics · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
25ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 24Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 65% Computational complexity · 26% Mathematical optimization · 6%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters › graph width parameters
clique-width
0.132006
Clique-width minimization is NP-hard · STOC 2006
On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and Treewidth · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph parameters
0.122006
Clique-width minimization is NP-hard · STOC 2006
On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and Treewidth · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation
0.122006
Clique-width minimization is NP-hard · STOC 2006
Restrictions of Minimum Spanner Problems · Inf. Comput. 1997
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters › graph width parameters
treewidth
0.112005
On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and Treewidth · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.012001
Factoring and Recognition of Read-Once Functions using Cographs and Normality · DAC 2001
Computational complexity › parameterized complexity
fixed-parameter tractability
0.012001
Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph classes
0.012001
Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001
Computational complexity
parameterized complexity
0.012001
Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
partitioning problems
0.012001
Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract) · SODA 2001
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › network design
spanner problems
0.011997
Restrictions of Minimum Spanner Problems · Inf. Comput. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hardness reduction · 0.1lower bound · 0.1exponential bounds · 0.1normality checking · 0.0graph partitioning · 0.0dynamic programming on clique-width · 0.0cograph recognition · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Clique-width of path powers
Pinar Heggernes, Daniel Meister 0001, Charis Papadopoulos, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.4
2015 A characterisation of clique-width through nested partitions
Bruno Courcelle, Pinar Heggernes, Daniel Meister 0001, Charis Papadopoulos, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.5
2015 Clique-width of full bubble model graphs
Daniel Meister 0001, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2012 Polynomial-time recognition of clique-width ≤3 graphs
Derek G. Corneil, Michel Habib, Jean-Marc Lanlignel, Bruce A. Reed, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.5
2010 Exploiting Restricted Linear Structure to Cope with the Hardness of Clique-Width
Pinar Heggernes, Daniel Meister 0001, Udi Rotics
TAMC3
2009 Clique-Width is NP-Complete
abstract
Clique-width is a graph parameter that measures in a certain sense the complexity of a graph. Hard graph problems (e.g., problems expressible in monadic second-order logic with second-order quantification on vertex sets, which includes NP-hard problems such as 3-colorability) can be solved in polynomial time for graphs of bounded clique-width. We show that the clique-width of a given graph cannot be absolutely approximated in polynomial time unless $P = NP$. We also show that, given a graph G and an integer k, deciding whether the clique-width of G is at most k is NP-complete. This solves a problem that has been open since the introduction of clique-width in the early 1990s.
Michael R. Fellows, Frances A. Rosamond, Udi Rotics, Stefan Szeider
SIAM J. Discret. Math.3
2008 An improvement on the complexity of factoring read-once Boolean functions
Martin Charles Golumbic, Aviad Mintz, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2008 Equistable distance-hereditary graphs
Ephraim Korach, Uri N. Peled, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2006 Clique-width minimization is NP-hard
abstract
Clique-width is a graph parameter that measures in a certain sense the complexity of a graph. Hard graph problems (e.g., problems expressible in Monadic Second Order Logic with second-order quantification on vertex sets, that includes NP-hard problems) can be solved efficiently for graphs of small clique-width. It is widely believed that determining the clique-width of a graph is NP-hard; in spite of considerable efforts, no NP-hardness proof has been found so far. We give the first hardness proof. We show that the clique-width of a given graph cannot be absolutely approximated in polynomial time unless P=NP. We also show that, given a graph G and an integer k, deciding whether the clique-width of G is at most k is NPhy complete. This solves a problem that has been open since the introduction of clique-width in the early 1990s.
Michael R. Fellows, Frances A. Rosamond, Udi Rotics, Stefan Szeider
STOC3
2006 Computing Graph Polynomials on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width
Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics, Ilya Averbouch, Benny Godlin
WG2
2006 Factoring and recognition of read-once functions using cographs and normality and the readability of functions associated with partial k-trees
Martin Charles Golumbic, Aviad Mintz, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2005 On the Relationship Between Clique-Width and Treewidth
abstract
Treewidth is generally regarded as one of the most useful parameterizations of a graph's construction. Clique-width is a similar parameterization that shares one of the powerful properties of treewidth, namely: if a graph is of bounded treewidth (or clique-width), then there is a polynomial time algorithm for any graph problem expressible in monadic second order logic, using quantifiers on vertices (in the case of clique-width you must assume a clique-width parse expression is given). In studying the relationship between treewidth and clique-width, Courcelle and Olariu [Discrete Appl. Math., 101 (2000), pp. 77--114] showed that any graph of bounded treewidth is also of bounded clique-width; in particular, for any graph G with treewidth k, the clique-width of G is at most 4 * 2 k - 1 + 1. In this paper, we improve this result by showing that the clique-width of G is at most 3 * 2 k - 1 and, more importantly, that there is an exponential lower bound on this relationship. In particular, for any k, there is a graph G with treewidth equal to k, where the clique-width of G is at least $2^{\lfloor k/2\rfloor - 1}$.
Derek G. Corneil, Udi Rotics
SIAM J. Comput.2
2003 Computing the Treewidth and the Minimum Fill-In with the Modular Decomposition
Hans L. Bodlaender, Udi Rotics
Algorithmica2
2003 Finding Maximum Induced Matchings in Subclasses of Claw-Free and P 5-Free Graphs, and in Graphs with Matching and Induced Matching of Equal Maximum Size
Daniel Kobler, Udi Rotics
Algorithmica2
2003 Edge dominating set and colorings on graphs with fixed clique-width
Daniel Kobler, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2003 Equistable chordal graphs
Uri N. Peled, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2001 Factoring and Recognition of Read-Once Functions using Cographs and Normality
abstract
An approach for factoring general boolean functions was described in GM:99 which is based on graph partitioning algorithms. In this paper, we present a very fast algorithm for recognizing and factoring read-once functions which is needed as a dedicated factoring subroutine to handle the lower levels of that factoring process. The algorithm is based on algorithms for cograph recognition and on checking normality. Our method has been implemented in the SIS environment, and an empirical evaluation is given.
Martin Charles Golumbic, Aviad Mintz, Udi Rotics
DAC3
2001 Polynomial algorithms for partitioning problems on graphs with fixed clique-width (extended abstract)
Daniel Kobler, Udi Rotics
SODA2
2001 On the Relationship between Clique-Width and Treewidth
Derek G. Corneil, Udi Rotics
WG2
2001 On the fixed parameter complexity of graph enumeration problems definable in monadic second-order logic
Bruno Courcelle, Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2000 Polynomial Time Recognition of Clique-Width \le \leq 3 Graphs (Extended Abstract)
Derek G. Corneil, Michel Habib, Jean-Marc Lanlignel, Bruce A. Reed, Udi Rotics
LATIN5
2000 Linear Time Solvable Optimization Problems on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width
Bruno Courcelle, Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics
Theory Comput. Syst.3
1999 On the Clique-Width of Perfect Graph Classes
Martin Charles Golumbic, Udi Rotics
WG2
1998 Linear Time Solvable Optimization Problems on Graphs of Bounded Clique Width
Bruno Courcelle, Johann A. Makowsky, Udi Rotics
WG3
1997 Restrictions of Minimum Spanner Problems
G. Venkatesan, Udi Rotics, M. S. Madanlal, Johann A. Makowsky, C. Pandu Rangan
Inf. Comput.2