Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David J. Sherman
dblp:s/DavidJamesSherman · also David James Sherman
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-2316-1005ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein family classification |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein families · Bioinform. 2009 Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein families · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
consensus clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein families · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein families · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › network visualization
biological network visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | ProViz: protein interaction visualization and exploration · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction › protein-protein interaction network analysis
protein interaction network visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | ProViz: protein interaction visualization and exploration · Bioinform. 2005 |
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein families · Bioinform. 2009 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
consensus clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein families · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
consensus clustering · 0.3election method · 0.1graph navigation · 0.1PSI-MI standard · 0.1GO annotation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Swarming along the evolutionary branches sheds light on genome rearrangement scenariosabstractA genome rearrangement scenario describes a series of chromosome fusion, fission, and translocation operations that suffice to rewrite one genome into another. Exact algorithmic methods for this important problem focus on providing one solution, while the set of distance-wise equivalent scenarios is very large. Moreover, no criteria for filtering for biologically plausible scenarios is currently proposed. We present an original metaheuristic method that uses Ant Colony Optimization to randomly explore the space of optimal and suboptimal rearrangement scenarios. It improves on the state of the art both by permitting large-scale enumeration of optimal scenarios, and by labeling each with metrics that can be used for post-processing filtering based on biological constraints. Nikolay Vyahhi, Adrien Goëffon, Macha Nikolski, David J. Sherman |
GECCO | 4 |
| 2009 | Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein familiesabstractBioinformatics 2007, 23(2), e71–e76 The discussion of the history of the consensus clustering problem in Section 1.3 is based on a paper by Filkov and Skiena (2003), cited later in this section. Subparagraphs 3, 4 and 6 of our Section 1.3 are direct quotations of this paper, and should have been cited as such in our manuscript. We apologize for this error. Macha Nikolski, David J. Sherman |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2008 | An efficient probabilistic population-based descent for the median genome problemabstractWe present a novel population-based local search algorithm for the median genome problem. The primary result of this article is that this probabilistic approach significantly improves the performance of ancestral genome reconstruction compared to existing methods, making it possible to tackle problems where the contemporary genomes may contain many hundreds of markers. Moreover, our method is not limited to triples of genomes, and thus solves the median genome problem in its generality. We show that in real application cases the computational results are highly robust, suggesting that we can interpret the computed median genomes as candidates carrying the semantics of ancestral architectures. Adrien Goëffon, Macha Nikolski, David J. Sherman |
GECCO | 3 |
| 2008 | Fusion and Fission of Genes Define a Metric between Fungal GenomesabstractGene fusion and fission events are key mechanisms in the evolution of gene architecture, whose effects are visible in protein architecture when they occur in coding sequences. Until now, the detection of fusion and fission events has been performed at the level of protein sequences with a post facto removal of supernumerary links due to paralogy, and often did not include looking for events defined only in single genomes. We propose a method for the detection of these events, defined on groups of paralogs to compensate for the gene redundancy of eukaryotic genomes, and apply it to the proteomes of 12 fungal species. We collected an inventory of 1,680 elementary fusion and fission events. In half the cases, both composite and element genes are found in the same species. Per-species counts of events correlate with the species genome size, suggesting a random mechanism of occurrence. Some biological functions of the genes involved in fusion and fission events are slightly over- or under-represented. As already noted in previous studies, the genes involved in an event tend to belong to the same functional category. We inferred the position of each event in the evolution tree of the 12 fungal species. The event localization counts for all the segments of the tree provide a metric that depicts the "recombinational" phylogeny among fungi. A possible interpretation of this metric as distance in adaptation space is proposed. Pascal Durrens, Macha Nikolski, David J. Sherman |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2007 | Family relationships: should consensus reign? - consensus clustering for protein familiesabstractMOTIVATION: Reliable identification of protein families is key to phylogenetic analysis, functional annotation and the exploration of protein function diversity in a given phylogenetic branch. As more and more complete genomes are sequenced, there is a need for powerful and reliable algorithms facilitating protein families construction. RESULTS: We have formulated the problem of protein families construction as an instance of consensus clustering, for which we designed a novel algorithm that is computationally efficient in practice and produces high quality results. Our algorithm uses an election method to construct consensus families from competing clustering computations. Our consensus clustering algorithm is tailored to serve the specific needs of comparative genomics projects. First, it provides a robust means to incorporate results from different and complementary clustering methods, thus avoiding the need for an a priori choice that may introduce computational bias in the results. Second, it is suited to large-scale projects due to the practical efficiency. And third, it produces high quality results where families tend to represent groupings by biological function. AVAILABILITY: This method has been used for Génolevures project to compute protein families of Hemiascomycetous yeasts. The data are available online at http://cbi.labri.fr/Genolevures/fam/ Macha Nikolski, David J. Sherman |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2007 | How to decide which are the most pertinent overly-represented features during gene set enrichment analysisabstractBACKGROUND: The search for enriched features has become widely used to characterize a set of genes or proteins. A key aspect of this technique is its ability to identify correlations amongst heterogeneous data such as Gene Ontology annotations, gene expression data and genome location of genes. Despite the rapid growth of available data, very little has been proposed in terms of formalization and optimization. Additionally, current methods mainly ignore the structure of the data which causes results redundancy. For example, when searching for enrichment in GO terms, genes can be annotated with multiple GO terms and should be propagated to the more general terms in the Gene Ontology. Consequently, the gene sets often overlap partially or totally, and this causes the reported enriched GO terms to be both numerous and redundant, hence, overwhelming the researcher with non-pertinent information. This situation is not unique, it arises whenever some hierarchical clustering is performed (e.g. based on the gene expression profiles), the extreme case being when genes that are neighbors on the chromosomes are considered. RESULTS: We present a generic framework to efficiently identify the most pertinent over-represented features in a set of genes. We propose a formal representation of gene sets based on the theory of partially ordered sets (posets), and give a formal definition of target set pertinence. Algorithms and compact representations of target sets are provided for the generation and the evaluation of the pertinent target sets. The relevance of our method is illustrated through the search for enriched GO annotations in the proteins involved in a multiprotein complex. The results obtained demonstrate the gain in terms of pertinence (up to 64% redundancy removed), space requirements (up to 73% less storage) and efficiency (up to 98% less comparisons). CONCLUSION: The generic framework presented in this article provides a formal approach to adequately represent available data and efficiently search for pertinent over-represented features in a set of genes or proteins. The formalism and the pertinence definition can be directly used by most of the methods and tools currently available for feature enrichment analysis. Roland Barriot, David J. Sherman, Isabelle Dutour |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2005 | ProViz: protein interaction visualization and explorationabstractUNLABELLED: ProViz is a tool for the visualization of protein-protein interaction networks, developed by the IntAct European project. It provides facilities for navigating in large graphs and exploring biologically relevant features, and adopts emerging standards such as GO and PSI-MI. AVAILABILITY: ProViz is available under the GPL and may be freely downloaded. Source code and binaries are available at http://cbi.labri.fr/eng/proviz.htm CONTACT: [email protected] Florian Iragne, Macha Nikolski, Bertrand Mathieu, David Auber, David J. Sherman |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 1998 | Almana: A BDD Minimization Tool Integrating Heuristic and Rewriting Methods
Macha Nikolskaïa, Antoine Rauzy, David J. Sherman |
FMCAD | 3 |
| 1998 | Factotum: Automatic and Systematic Sharing Support for Systems Analyzers
David J. Sherman, Nicolas Magnier |
TACAS | 1 |
| 1992 | Call Unfolding Strategies for Equational Logic Programs
David J. Sherman, Robert Strandh |
PEPM | 1 |
| 1991 | Optimization of Equational Programs Using Partial EvaluationabstractWe describe an application of partial evaluation to the optimization of Equational Logic programs.Our method treats the right-hand sides of reduction rules as partial input to subsequent reduction steps, allowing us to produce specialized forms of the rewriting system require complicated interpreters or semantic analysis. David J. Sherman, Robert Strandh, Irène Durand |
PEPM | 1 |