Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kimberly Tee

dblp:t/KimberlyTee · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
5 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 88% Accessibility and assistive technology · 7% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 3%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
family communication
0.222009
Exploring communication and sharing between extended families · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2009
SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness · CSCW 2008
Collaborative and social computing › remote collaboration
distributed groups
0.122009
Artifact awareness through screen sharing for distributed groups · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2009
Providing artifact awareness to a distributed group through screen sharing · CSCW 2006
Collaborative and social computing › groupware
screen sharing
0.122009
Providing artifact awareness to a distributed group through screen sharing · CSCW 2006
Artifact awareness through screen sharing for distributed groups · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2009
Collaborative and social computing
computer-mediated communication
0.112008
SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness · CSCW 2008
Collaborative and social computing
awareness
0.112006
Providing artifact awareness to a distributed group through screen sharing · CSCW 2006
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.112006
Providing artifact awareness to a distributed group through screen sharing · CSCW 2006
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
domestic technology
0.012008
SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness · CSCW 2008
Collaborative and social computing › user-generated content
photo sharing
0.012008
SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness · CSCW 2008
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal interaction
0.012005
A visual recipe book for persons with language impairments · CHI 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative design · 0.1field study · 0.1system design · 0.1deployment study · 0.1visual language design · 0.1case study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Evaluating interfaces with children
Kathryn Rounding, Kimberly Tee, Edward Tse
Pers. Ubiquitous Comput.2
2009 Exploring communication and sharing between extended families
Kimberly Tee, A. J. Bernheim Brush, Kori Inkpen
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2009 Artifact awareness through screen sharing for distributed groups
Kimberly Tee, Saul Greenberg, Carl Gutwin
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2008 SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness
abstract
Staying in touch with extended family members can be a challenge in part because of the time and effort required, even with the help of current technologies. To explore the value of sharing suggestions in sparking communication and facilitating sharing between extended families, we iteratively built SPARCS, a prototype that encourages frequent sharing of photos and calendar information between extended families. Results from a five-week field study with 7 pairs of families highlight a number of important features for an ideal sharing system to help families stay connected, including asynchronous chat and easily configurable sharing suggestions.
A. J. Bernheim Brush, Kori Inkpen, Kimberly Tee
CSCW3
2006 Providing artifact awareness to a distributed group through screen sharing
abstract
Despite the availability of awareness servers and casual interaction systems, distributed groups still cannot maintain artifact awareness – the easy awareness of the documents, objects, and tools that other people are using – that is a natural part of co-located work environments. To address this deficiency, we designed an awareness tool that uses screen sharing to provide information about other people’s artifacts. People see others’ screens in miniature at the edge of their display, can selectively raise a larger view of that screen to get more detail, and can engage in remote pointing if desired. Initial experiences show that people use our tool for several purposes: to maintain awareness of what others are doing, to project a certain image of themselves, to monitor progress and coordinate joint tasks, to help determine when another person can be interrupted, and to engage in serendipitous conversation and collaboration. People have also been able to balance awareness with privacy, by using the privacy protection strategies built into our system: restricting what parts of the screen others can see, specifying update frequency, hiding image detail, and getting feedback of when screenshots are taken.
Kimberly Tee, Saul Greenberg, Carl Gutwin
CSCW1
2005 A visual recipe book for persons with language impairments
abstract
Cooking is a daily activity for many people. However, traditional text recipes are often prohibitively difficult to follow for people with language disorders, such as aphasia. We have developed a multi-modal application that leverages the retained ability of aphasic individuals to recognize image-based representations of objects, providing a presentation format that can be more easily followed than a traditional text recipe. Through a systematic approach to developing a visual language for cooking, and the subsequent case study evaluation of a prototype developed according to this language, we show that a combination of visual instructions and navigational structure can help individuals with relatively large language deficits to cook more independently.
Kimberly Tee, Karyn Moffatt, Leah Findlater, Eve MacGregor, Joanna McGrenere, Barbara Purves, Sidney S. Fels
CHI1