Original paper can be found at: http://portal.acm.org/ Copyright ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1228716.1228759 [Full text of this article is not available in the UHRA]

This paper presents the results of video based human robot interaction (HRI) trials which investigated people's perceptions of different robot appearances and associated attention seeking features and behaviors displayed by the robot. The methodological approach highlights the "holistic" and embodied nature of robot appearance and behavior. Results show that people tend to rate a particular behavior less favorably when the behavior is not consistent with the robot's appearance. It is shown how participants' ratings of robot dynamic appearance are influenced by the robot's behavior. Relating participants' dynamic appearance ratings of individual robots to independently rated static appearance provides support for the left hand side of Mori's proposed "uncanny valley" diagram. We exemplify how to rate individual elements of a particular robot's behavior and then assess the contribution of those elements to the overall perception of the robot by people. Suggestions for future work are outlined.

The author regrets the omission of the co-authors on this paper. The authorship is now reproduced correctly here.

This paper presents the combined results of two studies that investigated how a robot should best approach and place itself relative to a seated human subject. Two live Human Robot Interaction (HRI) trials were performed involving a robot fetching an object that the human had requested, using different approach directions. Results of the trials indicated that most subjects disliked a frontal approach, except for a small minority of females, and most subjects preferred to be approached from either the left or right side, with a small overall preference for a right approach by the robot. Handedness and occupation were not related to these preferences. We discuss the results of the user studies in the context of developing a path planning system for a mobile robot.

This paper describes an extensive analysis of the comfort level data of 7 subjects with respect to 12 robot behaviours as part of a human-robot interaction trial. This includes robot action, proximity and motion relative to the subjects. Two researchers coded the video material, identifying visible states of discomfort displayed by subjects in relation to the robot's behaviour. Agreement between the coders varied from moderate to high, except for more ambiguous situations involving robot approach directions. The detected visible states of discomfort were correlated with the situations where the comfort level device (CLD) indicated states of discomfort. Results show that the uncomfortable states identified by both coders, and by either of the coders corresponded with 31% and 64% of the uncomfortable states identified by the subjects' CLD data (N=58), respectively. Conversely there was 72% agreement between subjects' CLD data and the uncomfortable states identified by both coders (N=25). Results show that the majority of the subjects expressed discomfort when the robot blocked their path or was on a collision course towards them, especially when the robot was within 3 meters proximity. Other observations include that the majority of subjects experienced discomfort when the robot was closer than 3m, within the social zone reserved for human-human face to face conversation, while they were performing a task. The advantages and disadvantages of the CLD in comparison to other techniques for assessing subjects' internal states are discussed and future work concludes the paper.

The study presented in this paper explored the relationships between subject personality and preferences in the direction from which a robot approached the human participants (N=42) in order to deliver an object in a naturalistic `living room' setting. Personality was assessed using the Big Five Domain Scale. No consistent significant relationships were found between personality traits and preferred approach directions; however, a consistent nonsignificant trend was found in which high scores on the personality trait extraversion was associated with a higher degree of tolerance to the approach directions rated overall as most uncomfortable. The implications of the results are discussed both from a theoretical and methodological viewpoint

The main aim of this study was to confirm the findings from previous pilot studies that results obtained from the same human robot interaction (HRI) scenarios in trials using both video-based and live methodologies were comparable. We investigated how a robot should approach human subjects in various scenarios relevant to the robot fetching an object for the subject. These scenarios include a human subject sitting in an open space, sitting at a table, standing in an open space and standing against a wall. The subjects experienced the robot approaching from various directions for each of these contexts in HRI trials that were both live and video-based. There was a high degree of agreement between the results obtained from both the live and video based trials using the same scenarios. The main findings from both types of trial methodology were: Humans strongly did not like a direct frontal approach by a robot, especially while sitting (even at a table) or while standing with their back to a wall. An approach from the front left or front right was preferred. When standing in an open space a frontal approach was more acceptable and although a rear approach was not usually most preferred, it was generally acceptable to subjects if physically more convenient

The results from two empirical studies of human–robot interaction are presented. The first study involved the subject approaching the static robot and the robot approaching the standing subject. In these trials a small majority of subjects preferred a distance corresponding to the ‘personal zone’ typically used by humans when talking to friends. However, a large minority of subjects got significantly closer, suggesting that they treated the robot differently from a person, and possibly did not view the robot as a social being. The second study involved a scenario where the robot fetched an object that the seated subject had requested, arriving from different approach directions. The results of this second trial indicated that most subjects disliked a frontal approach. Most subjects preferred to be approached from either the left or right side, with a small overall preference for a right approach by the robot. Implications for future work are discussed.

Children’s perceptions and evaluations of different robot designs are an important unexplored area within robotics research considering that many robots are specifically designed for children. To examine children’s feelings and attitudes towards robots, a large sample of children (N = 159) evaluated 40 robot images by completing a questionnaire for each image, which enquired about robot appearance, robot personality dimensions and robot emotions. Results showed that depending on a robot’s appearance children clearly distinguished robots in terms of their intentions (i.e. friendly vs. unfriendly), their capability to understand, and their emotional expression. Results of a principal components analysis of the children’s ratings of the robots’ personality attributes revealed two dimensions labelled ‘Behavioural Intention’ and ‘Emotional Expression’. Robots were classified according to their scores on these two dimensions and a content analysis of their appearance was conducted in an attempt to identify salient features of different robot personalities. Children judged human-like robots as aggressive, but human–machine robots as friendly. Results on children’s perceptions of the robots’ behavioural intentions provided tentative empirical support for the Uncanny Valley, hypothesized by (Mori, M., 1970), reflecting a situation where robots are very human-like, but still distinguishable from humans, evoking a feeling of discomfort or repulsion. The paper concludes with a discussion of design implications for robots, and the use of robots in educational contexts.

The study presented in this paper explored people's perceptions and attitudes towards the idea of a future robot companion for the home. A human-centred approach was adopted using questionnaires and human-robot interaction trials to derive data from 28 adults. Results indicated that a large proportion of participants were in favour of a robot companion and saw the potential role as being an assistant, machine or servant. Few wanted a robot companion to be a friend. Household tasks were preferred to child/animal care tasks. Humanlike communication was desirable for a robot companion, whereas humanlike behaviour and appearance were less essential. Results are discussed in relation to future research directions for the development of robot companions.

This poster considers the use of storyboards, in a classroom setting with children in the 8-12 age group. The storyboarding method allowed children to both generate and evaluate scenarios for a virtual world populated by synthetic characters for exploring bullying issues. This approach has assisted children in the process of visualising agent design and verbalising opinions. It has resulted in design implications that have emerged from enabling children to have a voice in the technology process.