Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Jonas Minke

dblp:00/10916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 61% Design research and methods · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods › qualitative analysis
affinity diagramming		 0.112012
Computer support for collaborative data analysis: augmenting paper affinity diagrams · CSCW 2012
Collaborative and social computing › team collaboration
collaborative data analysis		 0.112012
Computer support for collaborative data analysis: augmenting paper affinity diagrams · CSCW 2012
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work		 0.112012
Computer support for collaborative data analysis: augmenting paper affinity diagrams · CSCW 2012
Design research and methods
qualitative analysis		 0.012012
Computer support for collaborative data analysis: augmenting paper affinity diagrams · CSCW 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prototype design · 0.1interview study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Computer support for collaborative data analysis: augmenting paper affinity diagrams
abstract
The traditional paper-based affinity diagram is a powerful tool for collaborative qualitative data analysis, but the present paper-based process has limitations. In this work we describe how users work with paper-based affinity diagrams as uncovered through a set of interviews with professionals who use the method. We also present an early prototype system to provide computer support for paper-based affinities.
Gunnar Harboe, Jonas Minke, Ioana Ilea, Elaine M. Huang
 CSCW2