Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlos Vara-Thorbeck

dblp:04/3071 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 82% Robot manipulation · 18%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 33% Health and well-being technologies · 33% Usability and user experience research · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › task-space robot control
cartesian space control
0.112006
Control Movement Scheme based on Manipulability Concept for a Surgical Robotic Assistant · ICRA 2006
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112006
Control Movement Scheme based on Manipulability Concept for a Surgical Robotic Assistant · ICRA 2006
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
interface evaluation
0.012004
Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System · ICRA 2004
Health and well-being technologies
surgical robotics
0.012004
Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System · ICRA 2004
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.012004
Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Robot manipulation
medical robotics
0.012000
A Medical Robotic Assistant for Minimally Invasive Surgery · ICRA 2000
Medical and health informatics › surgical robotics › minimally invasive surgery
laparoscopic surgery
0.012006
Control Movement Scheme based on Manipulability Concept for a Surgical Robotic Assistant · ICRA 2006
Medical and health informatics
surgical robotics
0.012006
Control Movement Scheme based on Manipulability Concept for a Surgical Robotic Assistant · ICRA 2006
Medical and health informatics › surgical robotics
minimally invasive surgery
0.012000
A Medical Robotic Assistant for Minimally Invasive Surgery · ICRA 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parameter tuning · 0.1manipulability analysis · 0.1modular design · 0.1rating scale · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Control Movement Scheme based on Manipulability Concept for a Surgical Robotic Assistant
abstract
This paper proposes a Cartesian control scheme applied to a robotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. This system's main characteristic is that it emulates the movements of a human assistant, guiding the laparoscopic camera with precision to focus on the area in question inside the patient. Furthermore this control scheme requires adjustment of certain parameters in order to prevent saturation of the manipulator's actuators, and therefore the robot has been studied in terms of manipulability. The proposed movement control scheme has been implanted in the ERM robot used to carry out trials on thirty two patients
Victor F. Muñoz, Isabel García-Morales, Carlos Jesús Pérez-del-Pulgar, Jesús M. Gómez de Gabriel, Juan Jesús Fernández Lozano, Alfonso García-Cerezo, Carlos Vara-Thorbeck, Robert Lopez Toscano
ICRA7
2004 Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System
abstract
This work presents an approach to the evaluation of two interfaces for the control of a robotic surgical assistant. Each interface is associated to a different mode of controlling the system: by the surgeon (voice commands) or by the assistant (tactile interface). This two modes are allowed by the design of the manipulator, developed to occupy a small volume in the operating room. To evaluate the interfaces, a rating scale for teleoperated systems is proposed.
Juan Jesús Fernández Lozano, Jesús M. Gómez de Gabriel, Victor F. Muñoz, Isabel García-Morales, David Melgar, Carlos Vara-Thorbeck, Alfonso García-Cerezo
ICRA6
2000 A Medical Robotic Assistant for Minimally Invasive Surgery
abstract
Presents a robotic assistant for helping surgeons in minimally invasive surgery. This prototype does not require any modification of a standard operation theatre (furniture or surgery tools) for its installation and its putting into operation. Due to its modular design, the robotic assistant is defined as a multi-purpose tool that has been successfully used in laparoscopic surgery, cystoscopy diagnostic and transurethral resection. The system has been tested by using both patient simulators and animals for experimentation purposes.
Victor F. Muñoz, Carlos Vara-Thorbeck, Jesús M. Gómez de Gabriel, Juan Jesús Fernández Lozano, E. Sanchez-Badajoz, Alfonso García-Cerezo, Robert Lopez Toscano, A. Jimenez-Garrido
ICRA2