VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Kaltwang
dblp:07/7553
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-5780-1499ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Face, body and person analysis · 46% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Segmentation and scene understanding · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial behavior analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Doubly Sparse Relevance Vector Machine for Continuous Facial Behavior Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Doubly Sparse Relevance Vector Machine for Continuous Facial Behavior Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
relevance vector machine |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Doubly Sparse Relevance Vector Machine for Continuous Facial Behavior Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2016 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
facial action unit analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Latent trees for estimating intensity of Facial Action Units · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial action unit analysis
facial action unit intensity estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Latent trees for estimating intensity of Facial Action Units · CVPR 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › latent variable graphical model
latent tree models |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Latent trees for estimating intensity of Facial Action Units · CVPR 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Latent trees for estimating intensity of Facial Action Units · CVPR 2015 |
Wearable and physiological sensing
physiological signal analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Human behavior sensing for tag relevance assessment · ACM Multimedia 2013 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | A Dataset for Lane Instance Segmentation in Urban Environments · ECCV (8) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
facial expression analysis · 0.3eye gaze tracking · 0.3electroencephalogram · 0.3classifier training · 0.3sparse regression · 0.2multi-kernel learning · 0.2structure learning · 0.2belief propagation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | A Dataset for Lane Instance Segmentation in Urban Environments
Brook Roberts, Sebastian Kaltwang, Sina Samangooei, Mark Pender-Bare, Konstantinos Tertikas, John Redford |
ECCV (8) | 2 |
| 2016 | Differential Dementia Diagnosis on Incomplete Data with Latent Trees
Christian Ledig, Sebastian Kaltwang, Antti Tolonen, Juha Koikkalainen, Philip Scheltens, Frederik Barkhof, Hanneke Rhodius-Meester, Betty M. Tijms, Afina W. Lemstra, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Jyrki Lötjönen, Daniel Rueckert |
MICCAI (2) | 2 |
| 2016 | Doubly Sparse Relevance Vector Machine for Continuous Facial Behavior EstimationabstractCertain inner feelings and physiological states like pain are subjective states that cannot be directly measured, but can be estimated from spontaneous facial expressions. Since they are typically characterized by subtle movements of facial parts, analysis of the facial details is required. To this end, we formulate a new regression method for continuous estimation of the intensity of facial behavior interpretation, called Doubly Sparse Relevance Vector Machine (DSRVM). DSRVM enforces double sparsity by jointly selecting the most relevant training examples (a.k.a. relevance vectors) and the most important kernels associated with facial parts relevant for interpretation of observed facial expressions. This advances prior work on multi-kernel learning, where sparsity of relevant kernels is typically ignored. Empirical evaluation on challenging Shoulder Pain videos, and the benchmark DISFA and SEMAINE datasets demonstrate that DSRVM outperforms competing approaches with a multi-fold reduction of running times in training and testing. Sebastian Kaltwang, Sinisa Todorovic, Maja Pantic |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2016 | The Automatic Detection of Chronic Pain-Related Expression: Requirements, Challenges and the Multimodal EmoPain DatasetabstractPain-related emotions are a major barrier to effective self rehabilitation in chronic pain. Automated coaching systems capable of detecting these emotions are a potential solution. This paper lays the foundation for the development of such systems by making three contributions. First, through literature reviews, an overview of how pain is expressed in chronic pain and the motivation for detecting it in physical rehabilitation is provided. Second, a fully labelled multimodal dataset (named `EmoPain') containing high resolution multiple-view face videos, head mounted and room audio signals, full body 3D motion capture and electromyographic signals from back muscles is supplied. Natural unconstrained pain related facial expressions and body movement behaviours were elicited from people with chronic pain carrying out physical exercises. Both instructed and non-instructed exercises were considered to reflect traditional scenarios of physiotherapist directed therapy and home-based self-directed therapy. Two sets of labels were assigned: level of pain from facial expressions annotated by eight raters and the occurrence of six pain-related body behaviours segmented by four experts. Third, through exploratory experiments grounded in the data, the factors and challenges in the automated recognition of such expressions and behaviour are described, the paper concludes by discussing potential avenues in the context of these findings also highlighting differences for the two exercise scenarios addressed. M. S. Hane Aung, Sebastian Kaltwang, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Brais Martínez, Aneesha Singh, Matteo Cella, Michel F. Valstar, Hongying Meng, Andrew Kemp, Moshen Shafizadeh, Aaron C. Elkins, Natalie Kanakam, Amschel de Rothschild, Nick Tyler, Paul J. Watson, Amanda C. de C. Williams, Maja Pantic, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze |
IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. | 2 |
| 2015 | Latent trees for estimating intensity of Facial Action UnitsabstractThis paper is about estimating intensity levels of Facial Action Units (FAUs) in videos as an important step toward interpreting facial expressions. As input features, we use locations of facial landmark points detected in video frames. To address uncertainty of input, we formulate a generative latent tree (LT) model, its inference, and novel algorithms for efficient learning of both LT parameters and structure. Our structure learning iteratively builds LT by adding either a new edge or a new hidden node to LT, starting from initially independent nodes of observable features. A graph-edit operation that increases maximally the likelihood and minimally the model complexity is selected as optimal in each iteration. For FAU intensity estimation, we derive closed-form expressions of posterior marginals of all variables in LT, and specify an efficient bottom-up/top-down inference. Our evaluation on the benchmark DISFA and ShoulderPain datasets, in subject-independent setting, demonstrate that we outperform the state of the art, even under significant noise in facial landmarks. Effectiveness of our structure learning is demonstrated by probabilistically sampling meaningful facial expressions from the LT. Sebastian Kaltwang, Sinisa Todorovic, Maja Pantic |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2013 | Human behavior sensing for tag relevance assessmentabstractUsers react differently to non-relevant and relevant tags associated with content. These spontaneous reactions can be used for labeling large multimedia databases. We present a method to assess tag relevance to images using the non-verbal bodily responses, namely, electroencephalogram (EEG), facial expressions, and eye gaze. We conducted experiments in which 28 images were shown to 28 subjects once with correct and another time with incorrect tags. The goal of our system is to detect the responses to non-relevant tags and consequently filter them out. Therefore, we trained classifiers to detect the tag relevance from bodily responses. We evaluated the performance of our system using a subject independent approach. The precision at top 5% and top 10% detections were calculated and results of different modalities and different classifiers were compared. The results show that eye gaze outperforms the other modalities in tag relevance detection both overall and for top ranked results. Mohammad Soleymani 0001, Sebastian Kaltwang, Maja Pantic |
ACM Multimedia | 2 |
| 2009 | Static vs. dynamic modeling of human nonverbal behavior from multiple cues and modalitiesabstractHuman nonverbal behavior recognition from multiple cues and modalities has attracted a lot of interest in recent years. Despite the interest, many research questions, including the type of feature representation, choice of static vs. dynamic classification schemes, the number and type of cues or modalities to use, and the optimal way of fusing these, remain open research questions. This paper compares frame-based vs window-based feature representation and employs static vs. dynamic classification schemes for two distinct problems in the field of automatic human nonverbal behavior analysis: multicue discrimination between posed and spontaneous smiles from facial expressions, head and shoulder movements, and audio-visual discrimination between laughter and speech. Single cue and single modality results are compared to multicue and multimodal results by employing Neural Networks, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), and 2- and 3-chain coupled HMMs. Subject independent experimental evaluation shows that: 1) both for static and dynamic classification, fusing data coming from multiple cues and modalities proves useful to the overall task of recognition, 2) the type of feature representation appears to have a direct impact on the classification performance, and 3) static classification is comparable to dynamic classification both for multicue discrimination between posed and spontaneous smiles, and audio-visual discrimination between laughter and speech. Stavros Petridis, Hatice Gunes, Sebastian Kaltwang, Maja Pantic |
ICMI | 3 |