Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Kyung Nam

dblp:08/3097 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
question answering communities
0.112009
Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver's question answering community · CHI 2009
Collaborative and social computing › awareness
expertise location
0.112007
QuME: a mechanism to support expertise finding in online help-seeking communities · UIST 2007
Collaborative and social computing
social network analysis
0.112007
QuME: a mechanism to support expertise finding in online help-seeking communities · UIST 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

log analysis · 0.2interviews · 0.2social network data inference · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver's question answering community
abstract
Large general-purposed community question-answering sites are becoming popular as a new venue for generating knowledge and helping users in their information needs. In this paper we analyze the characteristics of knowledge generation and user participation behavior in the largest question-answering online community in South Korea, Naver Knowledge-iN. We collected and analyzed over 2.6 million question/answer pairs from fifteen categories between 2002 and 2007, and have interviewed twenty six users to gain insights into their motivations,roles, usage and expertise. We find altruism, learning, and competency are frequent motivations for top answerers to participate, but that participation is often highly intermittent. Using a simple measure of user performance, we find that higher levels of participation correlate with better performance. We also observe that users are motivated in part through a point system to build a comprehensive knowledge database. These and other insights have significant implications for future knowledge generating online communities.
Kevin Kyung Nam, Mark S. Ackerman, Lada A. Adamic
CHI1
2007 Arkose: reusing informal information from online discussions
abstract
Online discussions such as a large-scale community brainstorming often end up with an unorganized bramble of ideas and topics that are difficult to reuse. A process of distillation is needed to boil down a large information space into information that is concise and organized. We take a system-augmented approach to the problem by creating a set of tools with which human editors can collaboratively distill a large amount of informal information.
Kevin Kyung Nam, Mark S. Ackerman
GROUP1
2007 QuME: a mechanism to support expertise finding in online help-seeking communities
abstract
Help-seeking communities have been playing an increasingly critical role in the way people seek and share information. However, traditional help-seeking mechanisms of these online communities have some limitations. In this paper, we describe an expertise-finding mechanism that attempts to alleviate the limitations caused by not knowing users' expertise levels. As a result of using social network data from the online community, this mechanism can automatically infer expertise level. This allows, for example, a question list to be personalized to the user's expertise level as well as to keyword similarity. We believe this expertise location mechanism will facilitate the development of next generation help-seeking communities.
Jun Zhang 0008, Mark S. Ackerman, Lada A. Adamic, Kevin Kyung Nam
UIST4