Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Yuuki Seki

dblp:10/7940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 64% Human-AI interaction · 36%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › virtual agents
on-screen agent		 0.112010
Users' reactions toward an on-screen agent appearing on different media · HRI 2010
Human-robot interaction
user reaction to agent		 0.012010
Users' reactions toward an on-screen agent appearing on different media · HRI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Directing robot motions with paralinguistic information
Takanori Komatsu, Yuuki Seki
 HRI2
2010 Users' reactions toward an on-screen agent appearing on different media
abstract
We experimentally investigated users' reactions toward an on-screen agent appearing on three different types of media: a 42-inch television, 17-inch display, and 4.5-inch mobile PC. Specifically, we observed whether the users accepted the agent's invitation to a Shiritori game while they were engaged in given tasks. The results showed that most participants who received the invitation from the on-screen agent appearing on a 4.5-inch mobile PC accepted the agent's invitation, while most participants did not accept the invitation from the agent appearing on the other two formats. Therefore, the mobile PC appears to be an appropriate media for an on-screen agent that is required for interaction with users.
Takanori Komatsu, Yuuki Seki
 HRI2