Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiachun Du

dblp:122/5133 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-4396-097XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 56% Human-AI interaction · 44%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
2.442024
Locally Private Set-Valued Data Analyses: Distribution and Heavy Hitters Estimation · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Analyzing Preference Data With Local Privacy: Optimal Utility and Enhanced Robustness · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Hiding Numerical Vectors in Local Private and Shuffled Messages · IJCAI 2021
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
usability testing
1.012026
Agentic Audio Moderator vs Human Moderator in Think-Aloud Usability Testing: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial · CHI 2026
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › local differential privacy
heavy hitter identification
0.812024
Locally Private Set-Valued Data Analyses: Distribution and Heavy Hitters Estimation · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis
0.712023
Analyzing Preference Data With Local Privacy: Optimal Utility and Enhanced Robustness · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.512021
Hiding Numerical Vectors in Local Private and Shuffled Messages · IJCAI 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › distributed differential privacy
shuffle model
0.512021
Hiding Numerical Vectors in Local Private and Shuffled Messages · IJCAI 2021
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data analysis
distribution estimation
0.412020
Set-valued Data Publication with Local Privacy: Tight Error Bounds and Efficient Mechanisms · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Data stream processing
frequency estimation
0.212024
Locally Private Set-Valued Data Analyses: Distribution and Heavy Hitters Estimation · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.112021
Hiding Numerical Vectors in Local Private and Shuffled Messages · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
privacy-preserving federated learning
0.112021
Hiding Numerical Vectors in Local Private and Shuffled Messages · IJCAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

local differential privacy · 2.5theoretical analysis · 1.5frequency oracle · 1.5shuffle model · 1.0randomized controlled trial · 1.0design-based research · 1.0minimax lower bound analysis · 0.7borda rule · 0.7additive mechanism · 0.7wheel mechanism · 0.4unbiased estimator · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Agentic Audio Moderator vs Human Moderator in Think-Aloud Usability Testing: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
abstract
Agentic AI holds promise for usability testing, yet its role as an audio moderator in think-aloud protocols is not well understood. This study explores: (1) how to design and develop an agentic audio moderator for think-aloud usability testing, and (2) how participants moderated by an agentic moderator differ from those moderated by a human regarding task performance, verbalization behaviors, user experience, and social perceptions of the moderator. Using a design-based research approach, we interviewed nine UX experts, iteratively developed an AI moderator, and evaluated it in a randomized controlled trial (N = 60) with a note-taking application. Results suggest that significant differences were not observed between AI and human moderators in task performance or verbalization behaviors, though AI moderators received lower social perception ratings. This work contributes the first design-oriented evaluation of AI moderators in usability testing, offering implications for developing more acceptable and effective agentic audio moderators.
Wangda Zhu, Pengcheng An, Jiachun Du, Chen Li 0023
CHI5
2024 Locally Private Set-Valued Data Analyses: Distribution and Heavy Hitters Estimation
abstract
In many mobile applications, user-generated data are presented as set-valued data. To tackle potential privacy threats in analyzing these valuable data, local differential privacy has been attracting substantial attention. However, existing approaches only provide sub-optimal utility and are expensive in computation and communication for set-valued data distribution estimation and heavy-hitter identification. In this paper, we propose a utility-optimal and efficient set-valued data publication method (i.e.,Wheel mechanism). On the user side, the computational complexity is only$O(\min \lbrace m\log m, m e^\epsilon \rbrace )$and communication costs are$O(\epsilon +\log m)$bits, where$m$is the number of items,$d$is the domain size and$\epsilon$is the privacy budget, while existing approaches usually depend on$O(d)$or$O(\log d)$($d \gg m$). Our theoretical analyses reveal the estimation errors have been reduced from the previously known$O(\frac{m^{2} d}{n\epsilon ^{2}})$to the optimal rate$O(\frac{m d}{n\epsilon ^{2}})$. Additionally, for heavy-hitter identification, we present a variant of the Wheel mechanism as an efficient frequency oracle, entailing only$O(\sqrt{n})$computational complexity. This heavy-hitter protocol achieves an identification bar of$\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon }\sqrt{\frac{m}{n} \log d})$, reducing by a factor of$\sqrt{m}$relative to existing protocols. Extensive experiments demonstrate our methods are 3-100x faster than existing approaches and have optimized statistical efficiency.
Shaowei Wang 0003, Yuntong Li, Yusen Zhong, Kongyang Chen, Xianmin Wang, Zhili Zhou 0001, Fei Peng 0001, Yuqiu Qian, Jiachun Du, Wei Yang 0011
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.9
2023 Analyzing Preference Data With Local Privacy: Optimal Utility and Enhanced Robustness
abstract
Online service providers benefit from collecting and analyzing preference data from users, including both implicit preference data (e.g., watched videos of a user) and explicit preference data (e.g., ranking data over candidates). However, it brings ethical and legal issues of data privacy at the same time. In this paper, we study the problem of aggregating individual's preference data in the local differential privacy (LDP) setting. One naive approach is to add Laplace random noises, which however suffers from low statistical utility and is fragile to LDP-specific poisoning attacks. Therefore, we propose a novel mechanism to improve the utility and the robustness simultaneously: theadditive mechanism. The additive mechanism randomly outputs a subset of candidates with a probability proportional to their total scores. For preference data with Borda rule over$d$items, its mean squared error bound is optimized from$O(\frac{d^{5}}{n\epsilon ^{2}})$to$O(\frac{d^{4}}{n\epsilon ^{2}})$, and its maximum poisoning risk bound is reduced from$+\infty$to$O(\frac{d^{2}}{n\epsilon })$. We also theoretically investigate minimax lower bounds of$\epsilon$-LDP preference data aggregation, and prove the error rate of$O(\frac{d^{4}}{n\epsilon ^{2}})$is optimal for the Borda rule. Experimental results validate that our proposed approaches averagely reduce estimation error by 50% and are more robust to adversarial poisoning attacks.
Shaowei Wang 0003, Xuandi Luo, Yuqiu Qian, Jiachun Du, Wenqing Lin, Wei Yang 0011
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.4
2021 Hiding Numerical Vectors in Local Private and Shuffled Messages
abstract
Numerical vector aggregation has numerous applications in privacy-sensitive scenarios, such as distributed gradient estimation in federated learning, and statistical analysis on key-value data. Within the framework of local differential privacy, this work gives tight minimax error bounds of O(d s/(n epsilon^2)), where d is the dimension of the numerical vector and s is the number of non-zero entries. An attainable mechanism is then designed to improve from existing approaches suffering error rate of O(d^2/(n epsilon^2)) or O(d s^2/(n epsilon^2)). To break the error barrier in the local privacy, this work further consider privacy amplification in the shuffle model with anonymous channels, and shows the mechanism satisfies centralized (14 ln(2/delta) (s e^epsilon+2s-1)/(n-1))^0.5, delta)-differential privacy, which is domain independent and thus scales to federated learning of large models. We experimentally validate and compare it with existing approaches, and demonstrate its significant error reduction.
Shaowei Wang 0003, Jin Li 0002, Yuqiu Qian, Jiachun Du, Wenqing Lin, Wei Yang 0011
IJCAI4
2020 Set-valued Data Publication with Local Privacy: Tight Error Bounds and Efficient Mechanisms
abstract
Most user-generated data in online services are presented as set-valued data, e.g., visited website URLs, recently used Apps by a person, and etc. These data are of great value to service providers, but also bring privacy concerns if collected and analyzed directly. To tackle potential privacy threatens, local differential privacy (LDP) attracts increasing attention nowadays. However, existing approaches only provide sub-optimal error bound for set-valued data distribution estimation with LDP. Besides, it is computational expensive and communication expensive to use for high dimensional set-valued data, considering large domains in real scenarios. Thus, existing approaches are unpractical to use on resource-constrained user-side devices (e.g., smartphones and wearable devices). In this paper, we propose a utility-optimal and efficient set-valued data publication method (i.e., wheel mechanism ). On the user side, each user contributes only one numerical value to represent their privatized data. The computational complexity is O (min{ m log m , me ɛ }) and communication cost is O (log( me ɛ )) bits, while existing approaches usually depend on O ( d ) or O (log d ), where m is the number of items in the set-valued data ( m ≡ 1 for categorical data), d is the domain size (usually d ≫ m ) and ɛ is the privacy budget. On the server side, the estimator takes numerical values from users as input and derives an unbiased distribution estimation. Theoretical results show that estimation error bounds are improved from previously known [EQUATION] to the optimal rate [EQUATION]. Results on extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed wheel mechanism is 3-100× faster than existing approaches, meanwhile has optimal statistical efficiency.
Shaowei Wang 0003, Yuqiu Qian, Jiachun Du, Wei Yang 0011, Liusheng Huang, Hongli Xu 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.3
2018 ShapeTex: Implementing Shape-Changing Structures in Fabric for Wearable Actuation
abstract
Research in smart textiles and garments has mostly focused on integrating sensing technology. In order to make garments that are truly interactive it is also essential to develop technologies for actuating smart garments and textiles. This paper introduces ShapeTex, a thermal shape changing fabric that uses laminate thermal expansion to actuate textiles. We present the design process and rationale for ShapeTex; we explain the fabrication process we have developed for making ShapeTex accessible to fashion designers and interaction designers. Based on co-creation sessions with designers we discuss requirements derived from this material. Finally we present a number of concept prototypes created to explore and illustrate the potential applications of ShapeTex.
Jiachun Du, Panos Markopoulos 0001, Qi Wang 0075, Marina Toeters
TEI1