Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Blum
dblp:123/4935
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › image captioning
image caption evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Validated Image Caption Rating Dataset · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Validated Image Caption Rating Dataset · NeurIPS 2023 |
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Validated Image Caption Rating Dataset · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning rating predictors · 1.3gamified rating scale · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Validated Image Caption Rating DatasetabstractWe present a new high-quality validated image caption rating (VICR) dataset. How well a caption fits an image can be difficult to assess due to the subjective nature of caption quality. How do we evaluate whether a caption is good? We generated a new dataset to help answer this question by using our new image caption rating system, which consists of a novel robust rating scale and gamified approach to gathering human ratings. We show that our approach is consistent and teachable. 113 participants were involved in generating the dataset, which is composed of 68,217 ratings among 15,646 image-caption pairs. Our new dataset has greater inter-rater agreement than the state of the art, and custom machine learning rating predictors that were trained on our dataset outperform previous metrics. We improve over Flickr8k-Expert in Kendall's $W$ by 12\% and in Fleiss' $\kappa$ by 19\%, and thus provide a new benchmark dataset for image caption rating. Lothar Narins, Andrew T. Scott, Aakash Gautam, Anagha Kulkarni 0001, Mar Castanon, Benjamin Kao, Shasta Ihorn, Yue-Ting Siu, James M. Mason, Alexander Blum, Ilmi Yoon |
NeurIPS | 10 |
| 2003 | A Java-based framework for real-time control systemsabstractThis paper presents the Java version of the AOCS framework. The AOCS framework is an object-oriented software framework for real-time satellite control systems. It provides a set of design patterns, an adaptable architecture, and a set of configurable components that support the instantiation of satellite control applications. It was originally implemented in C++ but has now been ported to Java. The paper advocates the use of framework technology as the best way to promote software reuse in the control systems domain and discusses the precautions that must be taken to use this technology with Java as an implementation language in the presence of real-time constraints. It also presents two examples of instantiations of the AOCS frameworks with two different real-time Java implementations. Alexander Blum, Vaclav Cechticky, Alessandro Pasetti, Walter Schaufelberger |
ETFA (2) | 1 |