Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alvin Grissom II

dblp:126/8729 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6503-2703ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 29% Machine translation · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 24%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
emotion recognition
0.912025
CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
simultaneous machine translation
0.422015
Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Don't Until the Final Verb Wait: Reinforcement Learning for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2014
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples
0.312018
Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration
0.312018
Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312018
Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312018
Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.312025
CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text rewriting
sentence rewriting
0.212015
Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-based machine translation
0.212015
Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › corpus linguistics
corpus analysis
0.112019
Investigating Sports Commentator Bias within a Large Corpus of American Football Broadcasts · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.112014
Don't Until the Final Verb Wait: Reinforcement Learning for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interdisciplinary analysis · 1.7corpus analysis · 0.4input perturbation · 0.3gradient-based attribution · 0.3syntactic transformation rules · 0.2phrase-based machine translation · 0.2constituent parse trees · 0.2reinforcement learning · 0.2deterministic policy gradient · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding
abstract
NLP research has increasingly focused on subjective tasks such as emotion analysis. However, existing emotion benchmarks suffer fromtwo major shortcomings: (1) they largely rely on keyword-based emotion recognition, overlooking crucial cultural dimensions required fordeeper emotion understanding, and (2) many are created by translating English-annotated data into other languages, leading to potentially unreliable evaluation. To address these issues, we introduce Cultural Lenses on Emotion (CuLEmo), the first benchmark designedto evaluate culture-aware emotion prediction across six languages: Amharic, Arabic, English, German, Hindi, and Spanish. CuLEmocomprises 400 crafted questions per language, each requiring nuanced cultural reasoning and understanding. We use this benchmark to evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs on culture-aware emotion prediction and sentiment analysis tasks. Our findings reveal that (1) emotion conceptualizations vary significantly across languages and cultures, (2) LLMs performance likewise varies by language and cultural context, and (3) prompting in English with explicit country context often outperforms in-language prompts for culture-aware emotion and sentiment understanding. The dataset and evaluation code is available.
Tadesse Destaw Belay, Ahmed Haj Ahmed, Alvin Grissom II, Iqra Ameer, Grigori Sidorov, Olga Kolesnikova, Seid Muhie Yimam
ACL (1)3
2025 An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine Translation
abstract
Marine Carpuat, Omri Asscher, Kalika Bali, Luisa Bentivogli, Fred Blain, Lynne Bowker, Monojit Choudhury, Hal Daumé Iii, Kevin Duh, Ge Gao, Alvin C Grissom II, Marzena Karpinska, Elaine C Khoong, William D. Lewis, Andre Martins, Mary Nurminen, Douglas W. Oard, Maja Popovic, Michel Simard, François Yvon. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Marine Carpuat, Omri Asscher, Kalika Bali, Luisa Bentivogli, Frédéric Blain, Lynne Bowker, Monojit Choudhury, Hal Daumé III, Kevin Duh, Ge Gao 0001, Alvin Grissom II, Marzena Karpinska, Elaine C. Khoong, William D. Lewis, André F. T. Martins, Mary Nurminen, Douglas W. Oard, Maja Popovic, Michel Simard, François Yvon
EMNLP11
2024 Rapidly Piloting Real-time Linguistic Assistance for Simultaneous Interpreters with Untrained Bilingual Surrogates
abstract
Simultaneous interpretation is a cognitively taxing task, and even seasoned professionals benefit from real-time assistance. However, both recruiting professional interpreters and evaluating new assistance techniques are difficult. We present a novel, realistic simultaneous interpretation task that mimics the cognitive load of interpretation with crowdworker surrogates. Our task tests different real-time assistance methods in a Wizard-of-Oz experiment with a large pool of proxy users and compares against professional interpreters. Both professional and proxy participants respond similarly to changes in interpreting conditions, including improvement with two assistance interventions—translation of specific terms and of numbers—compared to a no-assistance control.
Alvin Grissom II, Jo Shoemaker, Benjamin Goldman, Ruikang Shi, Craig Stewart, C. Anton Rytting, Leah Findlater, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
LREC/COLING1
2022 Rare but Severe Neural Machine Translation Errors Induced by Minimal Deletion: An Empirical Study on Chinese and English
abstract
We examine the inducement of rare but severe errors in English-Chinese and Chinese-English in-domain neural machine translation by minimal deletion of source text with character-based models. By deleting a single character, we can induce severe translation errors. We categorize these errors and compare the results of deleting single characters and single words. We also examine the effect of training data size on the number and types of pathological cases induced by these minimal perturbations, finding significant variation. We find that deleting a word hurts overall translation score more than deleting a character, but certain errors are more likely to occur when deleting characters, with language direction also influencing the effect.
Ruikang Shi, Alvin Grissom II, Duc Minh Trinh
COLING2
2019 Investigating Sports Commentator Bias within a Large Corpus of American Football Broadcasts
abstract
Jack Merullo, Luke Yeh, Abram Handler, Alvin Grissom II, Brendan O’Connor, Mohit Iyyer. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Jack Merullo, Luke Yeh, Abram Handler, Alvin Grissom II, Brendan T. O'Connor 0001, Mohit Iyyer
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)4
2018 Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult
abstract
One way to interpret neural model predictions is to highlight the most important input features-for example, a heatmap visualization over the words in an input sentence.In existing interpretation methods for NLP, a word's importance is determined by either input perturbation-measuring the decrease in model confidence when that word is removed-or by the gradient with respect to that word.To understand the limitations of these methods, we use input reduction, which iteratively removes the least important word from the input.This exposes pathological behaviors of neural models: the remaining words appear nonsensical to humans and are not the ones determined as important by interpretation methods.As we confirm with human experiments, the reduced examples lack information to support the prediction of any label, but models still make the same predictions with high confidence.To explain these counterintuitive results, we draw connections to adversarial examples and confidence calibration: pathological behaviors reveal difficulties in interpreting neural models trained with maximum likelihood.To mitigate their deficiencies, we fine-tune the models by encouraging high entropy outputs on reduced examples.Fine-tuned models become more interpretable under input reduction without accuracy loss on regular examples.
Shi Feng 0005, Eric Wallace, Alvin Grissom II, Mohit Iyyer, Pedro Rodríguez 0001, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
EMNLP3
2016 Incremental Prediction of Sentence-final Verbs: Humans versus Machines
abstract
Verb prediction is important in human sentence processing and, practically, in simultaneous machine translation.In verb-final languages, speakers select the final verb before it is uttered, and listeners predict it before it is uttered.Simultaneous interpreters must do the same to translate in real-time.Motivated by the problem of SOV-SVO simultaneous machine translation, we provide a study of incremental verb prediction in verb-final languages.As a basis of comparison, we examine incremental verb prediction with human participants in a multiple choice setting using crowdsourcing to gain insight into incremental human performance in a constrained setting.We then examine a computational approach to incremental verb prediction using discriminative classification with shallow features.Both humans and machines predict verbs more accurately as more of a sentence becomes available, and case markers-when available-help humans and sometimes machines predict final verbs.
Alvin Grissom II, Naho Orita, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
CoNLL1
2015 Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine Translation
abstract
Divergent word order between languages causes delay in simultaneous machine translation.We present a sentence rewriting method that generates more monotonic translations to improve the speedaccuracy tradeoff.We design grammaticality and meaning-preserving syntactic transformation rules that operate on constituent parse trees.We apply the rules to reference translations to make their word order closer to the source language word order.On Japanese-English translation (two languages with substantially different structure), incorporating the rewritten, more monotonic reference translation into a phrase-based machine translation system enables better translations faster than a baseline system that only uses gold reference translations.
He He 0001, Alvin Grissom II, John Morgan, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Hal Daumé III
EMNLP2
2014 Don't Until the Final Verb Wait: Reinforcement Learning for Simultaneous Machine Translation
abstract
We introduce a reinforcement learningbased approach to simultaneous machine translation-producing a translation while receiving input wordsbetween languages with drastically different word orders: from verb-final languages (e.g., German) to verb-medial languages (English).In traditional machine translation, a translator must "wait" for source material to appear before translation begins.We remove this bottleneck by predicting the final verb in advance.We use reinforcement learning to learn when to trust predictions about unseen, future portions of the sentence.We also introduce an evaluation metric to measure expeditiousness and quality.We show that our new translation model outperforms batch and monotone translation strategies.
Alvin Grissom II, He He 0001, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, John Morgan, Hal Daumé III
EMNLP1
2012 Annotating Factive Verbs
Alvin Grissom II, Yusuke Miyao
LREC1