Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alvin Grissom II
dblp:126/8729
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6503-2703ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 29% Machine translation · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
emotion recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
simultaneous machine translation |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015 Don't Until the Final Verb Wait: Reinforcement Learning for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2014 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation Difficult · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text rewriting
sentence rewriting |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-based machine translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › corpus linguistics
corpus analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Investigating Sports Commentator Bias within a Large Corpus of American Football Broadcasts · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Don't Until the Final Verb Wait: Reinforcement Learning for Simultaneous Machine Translation · EMNLP 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interdisciplinary analysis · 1.7corpus analysis · 0.4input perturbation · 0.3gradient-based attribution · 0.3syntactic transformation rules · 0.2phrase-based machine translation · 0.2constituent parse trees · 0.2reinforcement learning · 0.2deterministic policy gradient · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion - Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion UnderstandingabstractNLP research has increasingly focused on subjective tasks such as emotion analysis. However, existing emotion benchmarks suffer fromtwo major shortcomings: (1) they largely rely on keyword-based emotion recognition, overlooking crucial cultural dimensions required fordeeper emotion understanding, and (2) many are created by translating English-annotated data into other languages, leading to potentially unreliable evaluation. To address these issues, we introduce Cultural Lenses on Emotion (CuLEmo), the first benchmark designedto evaluate culture-aware emotion prediction across six languages: Amharic, Arabic, English, German, Hindi, and Spanish. CuLEmocomprises 400 crafted questions per language, each requiring nuanced cultural reasoning and understanding. We use this benchmark to evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs on culture-aware emotion prediction and sentiment analysis tasks. Our findings reveal that (1) emotion conceptualizations vary significantly across languages and cultures, (2) LLMs performance likewise varies by language and cultural context, and (3) prompting in English with explicit country context often outperforms in-language prompts for culture-aware emotion and sentiment understanding. The dataset and evaluation code is available. Tadesse Destaw Belay, Ahmed Haj Ahmed, Alvin Grissom II, Iqra Ameer, Grigori Sidorov, Olga Kolesnikova, Seid Muhie Yimam |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine TranslationabstractMarine Carpuat, Omri Asscher, Kalika Bali, Luisa Bentivogli, Fred Blain, Lynne Bowker, Monojit Choudhury, Hal Daumé Iii, Kevin Duh, Ge Gao, Alvin C Grissom II, Marzena Karpinska, Elaine C Khoong, William D. Lewis, Andre Martins, Mary Nurminen, Douglas W. Oard, Maja Popovic, Michel Simard, François Yvon. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Marine Carpuat, Omri Asscher, Kalika Bali, Luisa Bentivogli, Frédéric Blain, Lynne Bowker, Monojit Choudhury, Hal Daumé III, Kevin Duh, Ge Gao 0001, Alvin Grissom II, Marzena Karpinska, Elaine C. Khoong, William D. Lewis, André F. T. Martins, Mary Nurminen, Douglas W. Oard, Maja Popovic, Michel Simard, François Yvon |
EMNLP | 11 |
| 2024 | Rapidly Piloting Real-time Linguistic Assistance for Simultaneous Interpreters with Untrained Bilingual SurrogatesabstractSimultaneous interpretation is a cognitively taxing task, and even seasoned professionals benefit from real-time assistance. However, both recruiting professional interpreters and evaluating new assistance techniques are difficult. We present a novel, realistic simultaneous interpretation task that mimics the cognitive load of interpretation with crowdworker surrogates. Our task tests different real-time assistance methods in a Wizard-of-Oz experiment with a large pool of proxy users and compares against professional interpreters. Both professional and proxy participants respond similarly to changes in interpreting conditions, including improvement with two assistance interventions—translation of specific terms and of numbers—compared to a no-assistance control. Alvin Grissom II, Jo Shoemaker, Benjamin Goldman, Ruikang Shi, Craig Stewart, C. Anton Rytting, Leah Findlater, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber |
LREC/COLING | 1 |
| 2022 | Rare but Severe Neural Machine Translation Errors Induced by Minimal Deletion: An Empirical Study on Chinese and EnglishabstractWe examine the inducement of rare but severe errors in English-Chinese and Chinese-English in-domain neural machine translation by minimal deletion of source text with character-based models. By deleting a single character, we can induce severe translation errors. We categorize these errors and compare the results of deleting single characters and single words. We also examine the effect of training data size on the number and types of pathological cases induced by these minimal perturbations, finding significant variation. We find that deleting a word hurts overall translation score more than deleting a character, but certain errors are more likely to occur when deleting characters, with language direction also influencing the effect. Ruikang Shi, Alvin Grissom II, Duc Minh Trinh |
COLING | 2 |
| 2019 | Investigating Sports Commentator Bias within a Large Corpus of American Football BroadcastsabstractJack Merullo, Luke Yeh, Abram Handler, Alvin Grissom II, Brendan O’Connor, Mohit Iyyer. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Jack Merullo, Luke Yeh, Abram Handler, Alvin Grissom II, Brendan T. O'Connor 0001, Mohit Iyyer |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 4 |
| 2018 | Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretation DifficultabstractOne way to interpret neural model predictions is to highlight the most important input features-for example, a heatmap visualization over the words in an input sentence.In existing interpretation methods for NLP, a word's importance is determined by either input perturbation-measuring the decrease in model confidence when that word is removed-or by the gradient with respect to that word.To understand the limitations of these methods, we use input reduction, which iteratively removes the least important word from the input.This exposes pathological behaviors of neural models: the remaining words appear nonsensical to humans and are not the ones determined as important by interpretation methods.As we confirm with human experiments, the reduced examples lack information to support the prediction of any label, but models still make the same predictions with high confidence.To explain these counterintuitive results, we draw connections to adversarial examples and confidence calibration: pathological behaviors reveal difficulties in interpreting neural models trained with maximum likelihood.To mitigate their deficiencies, we fine-tune the models by encouraging high entropy outputs on reduced examples.Fine-tuned models become more interpretable under input reduction without accuracy loss on regular examples. Shi Feng 0005, Eric Wallace, Alvin Grissom II, Mohit Iyyer, Pedro Rodríguez 0001, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2016 | Incremental Prediction of Sentence-final Verbs: Humans versus MachinesabstractVerb prediction is important in human sentence processing and, practically, in simultaneous machine translation.In verb-final languages, speakers select the final verb before it is uttered, and listeners predict it before it is uttered.Simultaneous interpreters must do the same to translate in real-time.Motivated by the problem of SOV-SVO simultaneous machine translation, we provide a study of incremental verb prediction in verb-final languages.As a basis of comparison, we examine incremental verb prediction with human participants in a multiple choice setting using crowdsourcing to gain insight into incremental human performance in a constrained setting.We then examine a computational approach to incremental verb prediction using discriminative classification with shallow features.Both humans and machines predict verbs more accurately as more of a sentence becomes available, and case markers-when available-help humans and sometimes machines predict final verbs. Alvin Grissom II, Naho Orita, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber |
CoNLL | 1 |
| 2015 | Syntax-based Rewriting for Simultaneous Machine TranslationabstractDivergent word order between languages causes delay in simultaneous machine translation.We present a sentence rewriting method that generates more monotonic translations to improve the speedaccuracy tradeoff.We design grammaticality and meaning-preserving syntactic transformation rules that operate on constituent parse trees.We apply the rules to reference translations to make their word order closer to the source language word order.On Japanese-English translation (two languages with substantially different structure), incorporating the rewritten, more monotonic reference translation into a phrase-based machine translation system enables better translations faster than a baseline system that only uses gold reference translations. He He 0001, Alvin Grissom II, John Morgan, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Hal Daumé III |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2014 | Don't Until the Final Verb Wait: Reinforcement Learning for Simultaneous Machine TranslationabstractWe introduce a reinforcement learningbased approach to simultaneous machine translation-producing a translation while receiving input wordsbetween languages with drastically different word orders: from verb-final languages (e.g., German) to verb-medial languages (English).In traditional machine translation, a translator must "wait" for source material to appear before translation begins.We remove this bottleneck by predicting the final verb in advance.We use reinforcement learning to learn when to trust predictions about unseen, future portions of the sentence.We also introduce an evaluation metric to measure expeditiousness and quality.We show that our new translation model outperforms batch and monotone translation strategies. Alvin Grissom II, He He 0001, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, John Morgan, Hal Daumé III |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2012 | Annotating Factive Verbs
Alvin Grissom II, Yusuke Miyao |
LREC | 1 |