Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Francis Fofie
dblp:129/5149
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › location-based services
location-based social networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Towards reliable spatial information in LBSNs · UbiComp 2012 |
Privacy and data protection
location privacy |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Towards reliable spatial information in LBSNs · UbiComp 2012 |
Privacy and data protection › location privacy
location proof |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Towards reliable spatial information in LBSNs · UbiComp 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.3location-proofs · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Towards reliable spatial information in LBSNsabstractThe proliferation of Location-based Social Networks (LBSNs) has been rapid during the last year due to the number of novel services they can support. The main interaction between users in an LBSN is location sharing, which builds the spatial component of the system. The majority of the LBSNs make use of the notion of check-in, to enable users to volunteeringly share their whereabouts with their peers and the system. The flow of this spatial information is unidirectional and originates from the users' side. Given that currently there is no infrastructure in place for detecting fake checkins, the quality of the spatial information plane of an LBSN is solely based on the honesty of the users. In this paper, we seek to raise the awareness of the community for this problem, by identifying and discussing the effects of the presence of fake location information. We further present a preliminary design of a fake check-in detection scheme, based on location-proofs. Our initial simulation results show that if we do not consider the infrastructural constraints, location-proofs can form a viable technical solution. Ke Zhang 0013, Wei Jeng, Francis Fofie, Konstantinos Pelechrinis, Prashant Krishnamurthy |
UbiComp | 3 |