Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Wüstenberg

dblp:130/5043 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › urban computing
human mobility
0.212013
Time-lag method for detecting following and leadership behavior of pedestrians from mobile sensing data · PerCom 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-lag similarity analysis · 0.3machine learning · 0.3graph link analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Distinguishing Electric Vehicles from Fossil-Fueled Vehicles with Mobile Sensing
abstract
Existing methods for transportation mode detection (TMD) using mobile sensing make it generally possible to distinguish between walking, cycling, and motorized transport. However, our means of transport evolve and we develop radically new ways of transporting ourselves, thus new TMD sub-classification methods are needed to distinguish these new transport forms. As we transition from fossil-fueled cars to electric vehicles, switch to bikes with electric motors, ride in hybrid buses, or do city sightseeing on Segways, new challenges arise in distinguishing these from a mobile sensing perspective. Distinguishing electric vehicles (EVs) from fossil-fueled vehicles (FFVs) is a challenge, where traditional methods based on features such as GPS speed, or statistics on raw accelerometer data, are insufficient. In this paper, we present methods for distinguishing EVs from FFVs using smartphones with built-in inertial sensors, by reliably identifying idle-engine motor vibrations through features built on frequency analysis. We provide an extensive analysis of the challenges involved in making the EV/FFV distinction, as well as practical tools based on the methods. This includes analyzing the measurable similarities and differences between EVs and FFVs, and developing methods of reliably separating them. The presented tools implement the methods as classifiers built using machine learning. The analysis of our experiments shows that we can achieve an accuracy of 89-95% distinguishing EVs from FFVs, even with on-body phones.
Markus Wüstenberg, Henrik Blunck, Kaj Grønbæk, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard
MDM (1)1
2013 Time-lag method for detecting following and leadership behavior of pedestrians from mobile sensing data
abstract
The vast availability of mobile phones with built-in movement and location sensors enable the collection of detailed information about human movement even indoors. As mobility is a key element of many processes and activities, an interesting class of information to extract is movement patterns that quantify how humans move, interact and group. In this paper we propose methods for detecting two common pedestrian movement patterns, namely individual following relations and group leadership. The proposed methods for identifying following patterns employ machine learning on features derived using similarity analysis on time lagged sequences of WiFi measurements containing either raw signal strength values or derived locations. To detect leadership we combine the individual following relations into directed graphs and detect leadership within groups by graph link analysis. Methods for detecting these movement patterns open up new possibilities in — amongst others — computational social science, reality mining, marketing research and location-based gaming. We provide evaluation results that show error rates down to 7%, improving over state of the art methods with up to eleven percentage points for following patterns and up to twenty percentage points for leadership patterns. Our method is, contrary to state of the art, also applicable in challenging indoor environments, e.g., multi-story buildings. This implies that even quite small samples allow us to detect information such as how events and campaigns in multistory shopping malls may trigger following in small groups, or which group members typically take the lead when triggered by e.g. commercials, or how rescue or police forces act during training exercises.
Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, Henrik Blunck, Markus Wüstenberg, Kaj Grønbæk, Martin Wirz, Daniel Roggen, Gerhard Tröster
PerCom3