VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tania Randall
dblp:131/8175
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-9477-5507ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
uncertainty visualization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Human Performance and Perception of Uncertainty Visualizations in Geospatial Applications: A Scoping Review · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Visualization and visual analytics
decision support |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Human Performance and Perception of Uncertainty Visualizations in Geospatial Applications: A Scoping Review · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scoping review · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Human Performance and Perception of Uncertainty Visualizations in Geospatial Applications: A Scoping ReviewabstractGeospatial data are often uncertain due to measurement, spatial, or temporal limitations. A knowledge gap exists about how geospatial uncertainty visualization techniques influence human factors measures. This comprehensive review synthesized the current literature on visual representations of uncertainty in geospatial data applications, identifying the breadth of techniques and the relationships between strategies and human performance and perception outcomes. Eligible articles described and evaluated at least one method for representing uncertainty in geographical data with participants, including land, ocean, weather, climate, and positioning data. Forty articles were included. Uncertainty was visualized using multivariate and univariate maps through colours, shapes, boundary regions, textures, symbols, grid noise, and text. There were varying effects, and no definitive superior method was identified. The predominant user focus was on novices. Trends were observed in supporting users understand uncertainty, user preferences, confidence, decision-making performance, and response times for different techniques and application contexts. The findings highlight the impacts of different categorizations within colour and shape techniques, heterogeneity in perception and performance evaluation, performance and perception mismatch, and differences and similarities between novices and experts. Contextual factors and user characteristics, including understanding the decision-maker's tasks, user type, and desired outcomes for decision-support appear to be important factors influencing the design of effective uncertainty visualizations. Future research on geospatial applications of uncertainty visualizations can expand on the observed trends with consistent and standardized measurement and reporting, further explore human performance and perception impacts with 3-dimensional and interactive uncertainty visualizations, and perform real-world evaluations within various contexts. Ryan Tennant, Tania Randall |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 2 |