Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elisa Klose

dblp:131/8676 · also Elisa Maria Klose · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Usability and user experience research · 37% Immersive interaction · 32% Interaction techniques and input · 32%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Immersive interaction
augmented reality interaction
0.412019
Text Presentation for Augmented Reality Applications in Dual-Task Situations · VR 2019
Usability and user experience research › user performance
dual-task performance
0.112019
Text Presentation for Augmented Reality Applications in Dual-Task Situations · VR 2019
Virtual and augmented reality › augmented reality display
AR glasses
0.112018
A User-Based Comparison of Two Augmented Reality Glasses · VR 2018
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality
0.112018
A User-Based Comparison of Two Augmented Reality Glasses · VR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload assessment · 0.7within-subject study · 0.7user study · 0.4stimulus-response task · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Text Presentation for Augmented Reality Applications in Dual-Task Situations
abstract
We investigate how reading text in augmented reality (AR) glasses and the simultaneous execution of three real-world tasks interfere with each other. The three tasks are a visual stimulus-response task (VSRT), a simple walking task and a walking obstacle course. Also, we investigate the effects of different AR text positions on primary task and reading performance as well as subjective preference. We propose a novel out of sight body-locked text placement for AR text presentation to be used in dual-task situations and compare it to head-locked text placement, each in two heights. AR reading affected performance in all tasks and reading speed was affected in all dual-task conditions. Participants subjectively preferred the body-locked text presentation, while objective measures do not reflect that preference. Differences between the tasks and several interaction effects between task and AR text placement demonstrate the necessity to carefully consider the context of use when designing AR reading UIs. The presented study with 12 participants provides insights into the effects of AR glasses usage in dual-task situations and several design recommendations are derived from the results.
Elisa Klose, Nils Adrian Mack, Jens Hegenberg, Ludger Schmidt
VR1
2018 A User-Based Comparison of Two Augmented Reality Glasses
abstract
We present a scenario-based laboratory study with 40 participants comparing two augmented reality (AR) glasses in a travelling scenario. In a within-subject design, the binocular Epson Moverio BT-200 and the monocular Vuzix M100 were compared with regard to performance, acceptance, workload and preference. While performance was equal with both glasses, the Epson Moverio BT-200 glasses got higher acceptance and lower workload ratings and were preferred by the majority of the participants. The findings provide knowledge on human factors in AR glasses usage.
Elisa Klose, Ludger Schmidt
VR1