Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dan D. Frey
dblp:135/8175
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless sensing and localization › magnetic sensing
magnetic localization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Enhanced magnetic localization with artificial neural network field models · ICRA 2013 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › location sensing
location tracking |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Enhanced magnetic localization with artificial neural network field models · ICRA 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dipole model · 0.5artificial neural network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Enhanced magnetic localization with artificial neural network field modelsabstractMost of magnetic localization and orientation systems use single dipole models to calculate magnetic field, which, due to the fundamental limitation of the dipole, become inaccurate as the sensors approach the surface of the magnet. Moreover, they are unable to account for geometry, magnetization and any physical imperfections of the magnetic source. This paper presents a novel method of modeling the magnetic field of axisymmetric permanent magnets with artificial neural networks (ANNs), which permits accurate field modeling even at close proximity to the magnet. ANN based field models used to characterize experimental field data of solid and annular cylindrical magnets were found to be on average at least 10 times more accurate than that of dipole based models. Using model-based localization, tracking results from following a predetermined figure `8' path were also promising, with an average error of 0.43 mm in XY plane and 0.93 mm in XZ plane from only three sensor inputs. Faye Y. Wu, Nathan M. Robert, Dan D. Frey, Shaohui Foong |
ICRA | 3 |