Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dan Rosenbaum

dblp:139/1382 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-9558-3195ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42% 3D vision · 30% Generative modeling · 17%
Computer graphics and multimedia
5 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes
1.632025
Flow Matching Neural Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Attentive Neural Processes · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Conditional Neural Processes · ICML 2018
Image and video processing
image restoration
1.332025
Looking Into the Water by Unsupervised Learning of the Surface Shape · NeurIPS 2025
The Return of the Gating Network: Combining Generative Models and Discriminative Training in Natural Image Priors · NIPS 2015
SeaThru-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields in Scattering Media · CVPR 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration › degradation removal
underwater image restoration
1.022024
Osmosis: RGBD Diffusion Prior for Underwater Image Restoration · ECCV (62) 2024
SeaThru-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields in Scattering Media · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
depth and surface reconstruction
0.912025
Looking Into the Water by Unsupervised Learning of the Surface Shape · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
Flow Matching Neural Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
stochastic processes
0.912025
Flow Matching Neural Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
neural radiance field
0.822023
SeaThru-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields in Scattering Media · CVPR 2023
From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like one · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
Osmosis: RGBD Diffusion Prior for Underwater Image Restoration · ECCV (62) 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
implicit neural representation
0.612022
From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like one · ICML 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › implicit neural representation
neural field generation
0.612022
From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like one · ICML 2022
Collaborative and social computing › cooperative work
group decision-making
0.512021
A Neural Network Auction For Group Decision Making Over a Continuous Space · IJCAI 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design
0.512021
A Neural Network Auction For Group Decision Making Over a Continuous Space · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › mixture model
gaussian mixture model
0.422015
The Return of the Gating Network: Combining Generative Models and Discriminative Training in Natural Image Priors · NIPS 2015
Learning the Local Statistics of Optical Flow · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
conditional neural process
0.312018
Conditional Neural Processes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.312018
Conditional Neural Processes · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.312025
Flow Matching Neural Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty management
imperfect information
0.212016
Subspace Learning with Partial Information · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.212016
Subspace Learning with Partial Information · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
subspace learning
0.212016
Subspace Learning with Partial Information · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
image prior
0.212015
The Return of the Gating Network: Combining Generative Models and Discriminative Training in Natural Image Priors · NIPS 2015
Image and video processing › image statistics › statistical image modeling
natural image prior
0.212015
The Return of the Gating Network: Combining Generative Models and Discriminative Training in Natural Image Priors · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
natural image statistics
0.212013
Learning the Local Statistics of Optical Flow · NIPS 2013
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.212013
Learning the Local Statistics of Optical Flow · NIPS 2013
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › acoustic model training
discriminative training
0.112015
The Return of the Gating Network: Combining Generative Models and Discriminative Training in Natural Image Priors · NIPS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

implicit neural representation · 2.3unsupervised learning · 1.7SIREN · 1.7diffusion prior · 1.5RGB-D · 1.5volumetric rendering · 1.3seathru image formation model · 1.3neural network · 1.0mechanism design · 1.0gradient ascent · 1.0flow matching · 0.9ODE solver · 0.9autoencoder · 0.6gaussian mixture model · 0.4discriminative training · 0.2bayes' rule · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Kernel Reboot: Breaking the Boundaries of Neural Tangent Kernels for Neural Fields
abstract
Neural fields (NFs) map continuous coordinates to signals such as color or density, but fast high-quality reconstruction from sparse observations remains difficult. Classical Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) regression gives closed-form fits, yet it is fundamentally linear and cannot accumulate reusable task priors. We develop three algorithms that address these gaps. NTK-KIP learns a distilled support set of coordinates (and optional labels) so that a finite NTK can inpaint large missing regions from little observed data, yielding a compact non-linear representation instead of a raw kernel solve. MetaQuill meta-learns a shared initialization for an INR so that new scenes can be adapted by updating only a small task-specific weight offset, which provides true feature learning and a reusable prior. Finally, MetaQuill-KIP fuses both ideas: it seeds the task with a KIP-style non-linear warm start, then refines only that small offset around the meta-learned initialization. MetaQuill-KIP achieves high-PSNR reconstructions and semantically plausible inpainting under very sparse observations, while requiring only lightweight per-instance adaptation, whereas diffusion-style baselines typically depend on large pretrained generative priors and costly per-image tuning. This shows that NTK-driven neural fields can be made both non-linear and meta-learnable, narrowing the gap between analytic kernels and practical few-shot reconstruction.
Amir Mallak, Alaa Maalouf, Lior Wolf, Daniela Rus, Dan Rosenbaum
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.5
2025 Flow Matching Neural Processes
abstract
Neural processes (NPs) are a class of models that learn stochastic processes directly from data and can be used for inference, sampling and conditional sampling. We introduce a new NP model based on flow matching, a generative modeling paradigm that has demonstrated strong performance on various data modalities. Following the NP training framework, the model provides amortized predictions of conditional distributions over any arbitrary points in the data. Compared to previous NP models, our model is simple to implement and can be used to sample from conditional distributions using an ODE solver, without requiring auxiliary conditioning methods.In addition, the model provides a controllable tradeoff between accuracy and running time via the number of steps in the ODE solver. We show that our model outperforms previous state-of-the-art neural process methods on various benchmarks including synthetic 1D Gaussian processes data, 2D images, and real-world weather data.
Hussen Abu Hamad, Dan Rosenbaum
NeurIPS2
2025 Looking Into the Water by Unsupervised Learning of the Surface Shape
abstract
We address the problem of looking into the water from the air, where we seek to remove image distortions caused by refractions at the water surface. Our approach is based on modeling the different water surface structures at various points in time, assuming the underlying image is constant. To this end, we propose a model that consists of two neural-field networks. The first network predicts the height of the water surface at each spatial position and time, and the second network predicts the image color at each position. Using both networks, we reconstruct the observed sequence of images and can therefore use unsupervised training. We show that using implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions (SIREN) leads to effective modeling of the surface height spatio-temporal signal and its derivative, as required for image reconstruction. Using both simulated and real data we show that our method outperforms the latest unsupervised image restoration approach. In addition, it provides an estimate of the water surface.
Ori Lifschitz, Tali Treibitz, Dan Rosenbaum
NeurIPS3
2024 Osmosis: RGBD Diffusion Prior for Underwater Image Restoration
Opher Bar Nathan, Deborah Levy, Tali Treibitz, Dan Rosenbaum
ECCV (62)4
2023 SeaThru-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields in Scattering Media
abstract
Research on neural radiance fields (NeRFs) for novel view generation is exploding with new models and extensions. However, a question that remains unanswered is what happens in underwater or foggy scenes where the medium strongly influences the appearance of objects. Thus far, NeRF and its variants have ignored these cases. However, since the NeRF framework is based on volumetric rendering, it has inherent capability to account for the medium's effects, once modeled appropriately. We develop a new rendering model for NeRFs in scattering media, which is based on the SeaThru image formation model, and suggest a suitable architecture for learning both scene information and medium parameters. We demonstrate the strength of our method using simulated and real-world scenes, correctly rendering novel photorealistic views underwater. Even more excitingly, we can render clear views of these scenes, removing the medium between the camera and the scene and reconstructing the appearance and depth of far objects, which are severely occluded by the medium. Our code and unique datasets are available on the project's website.
Deborah Levy, Amit Peleg, Naama Pearl, Dan Rosenbaum, Derya Akkaynak, Simon Korman, Tali Treibitz
CVPR4
2022 From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like one
abstract
It is common practice in deep learning to represent a measurement of the world on a discrete grid, e.g. a 2D grid of pixels. However, the underlying signal represented by these measurements is often continuous, e.g. the scene depicted in an image. A powerful continuous alternative is then to represent these measurements using an implicit neural representation, a neural function trained to output the appropriate measurement value for any input spatial location. In this paper, we take this idea to its next level: what would it take to perform deep learning on these functions instead, treating them as data? In this context we refer to the data as functa, and propose a framework for deep learning on functa. This view presents a number of challenges around efficient conversion from data to functa, compact representation of functa, and effectively solving downstream tasks on functa. We outline a recipe to overcome these challenges and apply it to a wide range of data modalities including images, 3D shapes, neural radiance fields (NeRF) and data on manifolds. We demonstrate that this approach has various compelling properties across data modalities, in particular on the canonical tasks of generative modeling, data imputation, novel view synthesis and classification.
Emilien Dupont, Hyunjik Kim, S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Dan Rosenbaum
ICML5
2021 A Neural Network Auction For Group Decision Making Over a Continuous Space
abstract
We propose a system for conducting an auction over locations in a continuous space. It enables participants to express their preferences over possible choices of location in the space, selecting the location that maximizes the total utility of all agents. We prevent agents from tricking the system into selecting a location that improves their individual utility at the expense of others by using a pricing rule that gives agents no incentive to misreport their true preferences. The system queries participants for their utility in many random locations, then trains a neural network to approximate the preference function of each participant. The parameters of these neural network models are transmitted and processed by the auction mechanism, which composes these into differentiable models that are optimized through gradient ascent to compute the final chosen location and charged prices.
Yoram Bachrach, Ian Gemp, Marta Garnelo, János Kramár, Tom Eccles, Dan Rosenbaum, Thore Graepel
IJCAI6
2019 Attentive Neural Processes
Hyunjik Kim, Andriy Mnih, Jonathan Schwarz, Marta Garnelo, S. M. Ali Eslami, Dan Rosenbaum, Oriol Vinyals, Yee Whye Teh
ICLR (Poster)6
2018 Conditional Neural Processes
abstract
Deep neural networks excel at function approximation, yet they are typically trained from scratch for each new function. On the other hand, Bayesian methods, such as Gaussian Processes (GPs), exploit prior knowledge to quickly infer the shape of a new function at test time. Yet, GPs are computationally expensive, and it can be hard to design appropriate priors. In this paper we propose a family of neural models, Conditional Neural Processes (CNPs), that combine the benefits of both. CNPs are inspired by the flexibility of stochastic processes such as GPs, but are structured as neural networks and trained via gradient descent. CNPs make accurate predictions after observing only a handful of training data points, yet scale to complex functions and large datasets. We demonstrate the performance and versatility of the approach on a range of canonical machine learning tasks, including regression, classification and image completion.
Marta Garnelo, Dan Rosenbaum, Chris J. Maddison, Tiago Ramalho, David Saxton, Murray Shanahan, Yee Whye Teh, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, S. M. Ali Eslami
ICML2
2016 Subspace Learning with Partial Information
abstract
The goal of subspace learning is to find a $k$-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{R}^d$, such that the expected squared distance between instance vectors and the subspace is as small as possible. In this paper we study subspace learning in a partial information setting, in which the learner can only observe $r \le d$ attributes from each instance vector. We propose several efficient algorithms for this task, and analyze their sample complexity.
Alon Gonen, Dan Rosenbaum, Yonina C. Eldar, Shai Shalev-Shwartz
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2015 The Return of the Gating Network: Combining Generative Models and Discriminative Training in Natural Image Priors
abstract
In recent years, approaches based on machine learning have achieved state-of-the-art performance on image restoration problems. Successful approaches include both generative models of natural images as well as discriminative training of deep neural networks. Discriminative training of feed forward architectures allows explicit control over the computational cost of performing restoration and therefore often leads to better performance at the same cost at run time. In contrast, generative models have the advantage that they can be trained once and then adapted to any image restoration task by a simple use of Bayes' rule. In this paper we show how to combine the strengths of both approaches by training a discriminative, feed-forward architecture to predict the state of latent variables in a generative model of natural images. We apply this idea to the very successful Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) of natural images. We show that it is possible to achieve comparable performance as the original GMM but with two orders of magnitude improvement in run time while maintaining the advantage of generative models.
Dan Rosenbaum, Yair Weiss
NIPS1
2013 Learning the Local Statistics of Optical Flow
abstract
Motivated by recent progress in natural image statistics, we use newly available datasets with ground truth optical flow to learn the local statistics of optical flow and rigorously compare the learned model to prior models assumed by computer vision optical flow algorithms. We find that a Gaussian mixture model with 64 components provides a significantly better model for local flow statistics when compared to commonly used models. We investigate the source of the GMMs success and show it is related to an explicit representation of flow boundaries. We also learn a model that jointly models the local intensity pattern and the local optical flow. In accordance with the assumptions often made in computer vision, the model learns that flow boundaries are more likely at intensity boundaries. However, when evaluated on a large dataset, this dependency is very weak and the benefit of conditioning flow estimation on the local intensity pattern is marginal.
Dan Rosenbaum, Daniel Zoran, Yair Weiss
NIPS1