Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joe A. Wasserman
dblp:145/3671
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-9705-1853ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 50% Games and playful interaction · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Games and playful interaction
player experience |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The common player-avatar interaction scale (cPAX): Expansion and cross-language validation · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2019 |
Usability and user experience research › scale development
scale validation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The common player-avatar interaction scale (cPAX): Expansion and cross-language validation · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scale development · 0.4cross-language validation · 0.4confirmatory factor analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | The common player-avatar interaction scale (cPAX): Expansion and cross-language validation
Jaime Banks, Nicholas David Bowman, Jih-Hsuan Lin, Daniel Pietschmann, Joe A. Wasserman |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 5 |
| 2014 | A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for successabstractOBJECTIVE: To describe the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support (CDS) at leading sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted ethnographic observations at seven diverse sites with a history of excellence in CDS using the Rapid Assessment Process and analyzed the data using a series of card sorts, informed by Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model. RESULTS: We identified 18 activities and grouped them into four areas. Area 1: Fostering relationships across the organization, with activities (a) training and support, (b) visibility/presence on the floor, (c) liaising between people, (d) administration and leadership, (e) project management, (f) cheerleading/buy-in/sponsorship, (g) preparing for CDS implementation. Area 2: Assembling the system with activities (a) providing technical support, (b) CDS content development, (c) purchasing products from vendors (d) knowledge management, (e) system integration. Area 3: Using CDS to achieve the organization's goals with activities (a) reporting, (b) requirements-gathering/specifications, (c) monitoring CDS, (d) linking CDS to goals, (e) managing data. Area 4: Participation in external policy and standards activities (this area consists of only a single activity). We also identified a set of recommendations associated with these 18 activities. DISCUSSION: All 18 activities we identified were performed at all sites, although the way they were organized into roles differed substantially. We consider these activities critical to the success of a CDS program. CONCLUSIONS: A series of activities are performed by sites strong in CDS, and sites adopting CDS should ensure they incorporate these activities into their efforts. Adam Wright, Joan S. Ash, Jessica L. Erickson, Joe A. Wasserman, Arwen Bunce, Ana Stanescu 0002, Daniel St Hilaire, Morgan Panzenhagen, Eric Gebhardt, Carmit K. McMullen, Blackford Middleton, Dean F. Sittig |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 4 |