Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jaehyuk Park

dblp:149/7555 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8227-1143ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 93% Image recognition and object detection · 7%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model applications
0.812024
Labor Space: A Unifying Representation of the Labor Market via Large Language Models · WWW 2024
Computational finance and economics
labor market analytics
0.812024
Labor Space: A Unifying Representation of the Labor Market via Large Language Models · WWW 2024
Collaborative and social computing › social media
social media analysis
0.212016
Style in the Age of Instagram: Predicting Success within the Fashion Industry using Social Media · CSCW 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text representation
0.212024
Labor Space: A Unifying Representation of the Labor Market via Large Language Models · WWW 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.5predictive modeling · 0.5machine learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Understanding Users' Dissatisfaction with ChatGPT Responses: Types, Resolving Tactics, and the Effect of Knowledge Level
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) with chat-based capabilities, such as ChatGPT, are widely used in various workflows. However, due to a limited understanding of these large-scale models, users struggle to use this technology and experience different kinds of dissatisfaction. Researchers have introduced several methods, such as prompt engineering, to improve model responses. However, they focus on enhancing the model’s performance in specific tasks, and little has been investigated on how to deal with the user dissatisfaction resulting from the model’s responses. Therefore, with ChatGPT as the case study, we examine users’ dissatisfaction along with their strategies to address the dissatisfaction. After organizing users’ dissatisfaction with LLM into seven categories based on a literature review, we collected 511 instances of dissatisfactory ChatGPT responses from 107 users and their detailed recollections of dissatisfactory experiences, which we released as a publicly accessible dataset. Our analysis reveals that users most frequently experience dissatisfaction when ChatGPT fails to grasp their intentions, while they rate the severity of dissatisfaction related to accuracy the highest. We also identified four tactics users employ to address their dissatisfaction and their effectiveness. We found that users often do not use any tactics to address their dissatisfaction, and even when using tactics, 72% of dissatisfaction remained unresolved. Moreover, we found that users with low knowledge of LLMs tend to face more dissatisfaction on accuracy while they often put minimal effort in addressing dissatisfaction. Based on these findings, we propose design implications for minimizing user dissatisfaction and enhancing the usability of chat-based LLM.
Yoonsu Kim, Jueon Lee, Seoyoung Kim 0002, Jaehyuk Park, Juho Kim 0001
IUI4
2024 Labor Space: A Unifying Representation of the Labor Market via Large Language Models
abstract
1
Seongwoon Kim, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Jaehyuk Park
WWW3
2016 Style in the Age of Instagram: Predicting Success within the Fashion Industry using Social Media
abstract
Fashion is a multi-billion dollar industry with social and economic implications worldwide. To gain popularity, brands want to be represented by the top popular models. As new faces are selected using stringent (and often criticized) aesthetic criteria, a priori predictions are made difficult by information cascades and other fundamental trend-setting mechanisms. However, the increasing usage of social media within and without the industry may be affecting this traditional system. We therefore seek to understand the ingredients of success of fashion models in the age of Instagram. Combining data from a comprehensive online fashion database and the popular mobile image-sharing platform, we apply a ma- chine learning framework to predict the tenure of a cohort of new faces for the 2015 Spring/Summer season throughout the subsequent 2015-16 Fall / Winter season. Our framework successfully predicts most of the new popular models who appeared in 2015. In particular, we find that a strong social media presence may be more important than being under contract with a top agency, or than the aesthetic standards sought after by the industry.
Jaehyuk Park, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Emilio Ferrara
CSCW1