Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tolga Bolukbasi
dblp:150/4230
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Language models and text generation · 15% Efficient and distributed learning · 12% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noise · CVPR 2021 The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Models · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regions · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
training data attribution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model Pretraining · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data-efficient learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Influence Guided Data Reweighting for Language Model Pre-training · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Influence Guided Data Reweighting for Language Model Pre-training · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
sample reweighting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Influence Guided Data Reweighting for Language Model Pre-training · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noise · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
integrated gradients |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noise · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noise · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 2 | 2020 | Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings · NIPS 2016 The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Models · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explanation evaluation
attribution evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regions · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency attribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regions · ICCV 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Robust Text Classifier on Test-Time Budgets · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
adaptive inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Neural Networks for Efficient Inference · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
early exit |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Neural Networks for Efficient Inference · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Resource Constrained Structured Prediction · AAAI 2017 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
passage retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model Pretraining · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness in NLP
bias in word embeddings |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Model Selection by Linear Programming · ECCV (2) 2014 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
deep neural network interpretation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noise · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hessian approximation · 1.7gradient-based attribution · 1.7BM25 · 1.7integrated gradients · 0.9interactive visualization · 0.9self-influence scores · 0.7path attribution · 0.5adaptive path method · 0.5early exit · 0.4budgeted inference · 0.4structured prediction · 0.3linear programming · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model PretrainingabstractTraining data attribution (TDA) methods aim to attribute model outputs back to specific training examples, and the application of these methods to large language model (LLM) outputs could significantly advance model transparency and data curation. However, it has been challenging to date to apply these methods to the full scale of LLM pretraining. In this paper, we refine existing gradient-based methods to work effectively at scale, allowing us to retrieve influential examples for an 8B-parameter language model from a pretraining corpus of over 160B tokens with no need for subsampling or pre-filtering. Our method combines several techniques, including optimizer state correction, a task-specific Hessian approximation, and normalized encodings, which we find to be critical for performance at scale. In quantitative evaluations on a fact tracing task, our method performs best at identifying examples that influence model predictions, but classical, model-agnostic retrieval methods such as BM25 still perform better at finding passages which explicitly contain relevant facts. These results demonstrate a misalignment between factual *attribution* and causal *influence*. With increasing model size and training tokens, we find that influence more closely aligns with factual attribution. Finally, we examine different types of examples identified as influential by our method, finding that while many directly entail a particular fact, others support the same output by reinforcing priors on relation types, common entities, and names. We release our prompt set and model outputs, along with a web-based visualization tool to explore influential examples for factual predictions, commonsense reasoning, arithmetic, and open-ended generation for an 8B-parameter LLM. Tyler A. Chang, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Tolga Bolukbasi, Lucas Dixon, Ian Tenney |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Self-Influence Guided Data Reweighting for Language Model Pre-trainingabstractLanguage Models (LMs) pre-trained with selfsupervision on large text corpora have become the default starting point for developing models for various NLP tasks.Once the pre-training corpus has been assembled, all data samples in the corpus are treated with equal importance during LM pre-training.However, due to varying levels of relevance and quality of data, equal importance to all the data samples may not be the optimal choice.While data reweighting has been explored in the context of task-specific supervised learning and LM fine-tuning, model-driven reweighting for pretraining data has not been explored.We fill this important gap and propose PRESENCE, a method for jointly reweighting samples by leveraging self-influence (SI) scores as an indicator of sample importance and pre-training.PRESENCE promotes novelty and stability for model pre-training.Through extensive analysis spanning multiple model sizes, datasets, and tasks, we present PRESENCE as an important first step in the research direction of sample reweighting for pre-training language models. Megh Thakkar, Tolga Bolukbasi, Sriram Ganapathy, Shikhar Vashishth, Sarath Chandar, Partha Talukdar |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2021 | Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing NoiseabstractIntegrated Gradients (IG) [29] is a commonly used feature attribution method for deep neural networks. While IG has many desirable properties, the method often produces spurious/noisy pixel attributions in regions that are not related to the predicted class when applied to visual models. While this has been previously noted [27], most existing solutions [25], [17] are aimed at addressing the symptoms by explicitly reducing the noise in the resulting attributions. In this work, we show that one of the causes of the problem is the accumulation of noise along the IG path. To minimize the effect of this source of noise, we propose adapting the attribution path itself - conditioning the path not just on the image but also on the model being explained. We introduce Adaptive Path Methods (APMs) as a generalization of path methods, and Guided IG as a specific instance of an APM. Empirically, Guided IG creates saliency maps better aligned with the model's prediction and the input image that is being explained. We show through qualitative and quantitative experiments that Guided IG outperforms other, related methods in nearly every experiment. Andrei Kapishnikov, Subhashini Venugopalan, Besim Avci, Benjamin D. Wedin, Michael Terry, Tolga Bolukbasi |
CVPR | 6 |
| 2020 | The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning ModelsabstractA key challenge in developing and deploying Machine Learning (ML) systems is understanding their performance across a wide range of inputs. To address this challenge, we created the What-If Tool, an open-source application that allows practitioners to probe, visualize, and analyze ML systems, with minimal coding. The What-If Tool lets practitioners test performance in hypothetical situations, analyze the importance of different data features, and visualize model behavior across multiple models and subsets of input data. It also lets practitioners measure systems according to multiple ML fairness metrics. We describe the design of the tool, and report on real-life usage at different organizations. James Wexler, Mahima Pushkarna, Tolga Bolukbasi, Martin Wattenberg, Fernanda B. Viégas, Jimbo Wilson |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |
| 2019 | Robust Text Classifier on Test-Time BudgetsabstractMd Rizwan Parvez, Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, Venkatesh Saligrama. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Md. Rizwan Parvez, Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Venkatesh Saligrama |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | XRAI: Better Attributions Through RegionsabstractSaliency methods can aid understanding of deep neural networks. Recent years have witnessed many improvements to saliency methods, as well as new ways for evaluating them. In this paper, we 1) present a novel region-based attribution method, XRAI, that builds upon integrated gradients (Sundararajan et al. 2017), 2) introduce evaluation methods for empirically assessing the quality of image-based saliency maps (Performance Information Curves (PICs)), and 3) contribute an axiom-based sanity check for attribution methods. Through empirical experiments and example results, we show that XRAI produces better results than other saliency methods for common models and the ImageNet dataset. Andrei Kapishnikov, Tolga Bolukbasi, Fernanda B. Viégas, Michael Terry |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2017 | Resource Constrained Structured Prediction
Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Joseph Wang 0001, Venkatesh Saligrama |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Adaptive Neural Networks for Efficient InferenceabstractWe present an approach to adaptively utilize deep neural networks in order to reduce the evaluation time on new examples without loss of accuracy. Rather than attempting to redesign or approximate existing networks, we propose two schemes that adaptively utilize networks. We first pose an adaptive network evaluation scheme, where we learn a system to adaptively choose the components of a deep network to be evaluated for each example. By allowing examples correctly classified using early layers of the system to exit, we avoid the computational time associated with full evaluation of the network. We extend this to learn a network selection system that adaptively selects the network to be evaluated for each example. We show that computational time can be dramatically reduced by exploiting the fact that many examples can be correctly classified using relatively efficient networks and that complex, computationally costly networks are only necessary for a small fraction of examples. We pose a global objective for learning an adaptive early exit or network selection policy and solve it by reducing the policy learning problem to a layer-by-layer weighted binary classification problem. Empirically, these approaches yield dramatic reductions in computational cost, with up to a 2.8x speedup on state-of-the-art networks from the ImageNet image recognition challenge with minimal ($<1\%$) loss of top5 accuracy. Tolga Bolukbasi, Joseph Wang 0001, Ofer Dekel, Venkatesh Saligrama |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word EmbeddingsabstractThe blind application of machine learning runs the risk of amplifying biases present in data. Such a danger is facing us with word embedding, a popular framework to represent text data as vectors which has been used in many machine learning and natural language processing tasks. We show that even word embeddings trained on Google News articles exhibit female/male gender stereotypes to a disturbing extent. This raises concerns because their widespread use, as we describe, often tends to amplify these biases. Geometrically, gender bias is first shown to be captured by a direction in the word embedding. Second, gender neutral words are shown to be linearly separable from gender definition words in the word embedding. Using these properties, we provide a methodology for modifying an embedding to remove gender stereotypes, such as the association between the words receptionist and female, while maintaining desired associations such as between the words queen and female. Using crowd-worker evaluation as well as standard benchmarks, we empirically demonstrate that our algorithms significantly reduce gender bias in embeddings while preserving the its useful properties such as the ability to cluster related concepts and to solve analogy tasks. The resulting embeddings can be used in applications without amplifying gender bias. Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, James Zou 0001, Venkatesh Saligrama, Adam Tauman Kalai |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2014 | Model Selection by Linear Programming
Joseph Wang 0001, Tolga Bolukbasi, Kirill Trapeznikov, Venkatesh Saligrama |
ECCV (2) | 2 |