Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kranthi Sontineni

dblp:155/5765 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Cellular and mobile networks · 46% Network performance modeling · 40% Content delivery and video streaming · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks › LTE
VoLTE
0.212015
Performance Characterization and Call Reliability Diagnosis Support for Voice over LTE · MobiCom 2015
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › quality of experience
qoe measurement
0.212014
QoE Doctor: Diagnosing Mobile App QoE with Automated UI Control and Cross-layer Analysis · Internet Measurement Conference 2014
Network performance modeling
cross-layer analysis
0.212014
QoE Doctor: Diagnosing Mobile App QoE with Automated UI Control and Cross-layer Analysis · Internet Measurement Conference 2014
Content delivery and video streaming › quality of experience
speech quality assessment
0.112015
Performance Characterization and Call Reliability Diagnosis Support for Voice over LTE · MobiCom 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cross-layer analysis · 0.8automated UI control · 0.6on-device problem detection · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Performance Characterization and Call Reliability Diagnosis Support for Voice over LTE
abstract
To understand VoLTE performance in a commercial deployment, in this paper we conduct the first comprehensive performance characterization of commercially deployed VoLTE, and compare with legacy call and over-the-top (OTT) VoIP call. We confirm that VoLTE excels in most metrics such as audio quality, but its call reliability still lags behind legacy call for all the three major U.S. operators. We propose an on-device VoLTE problem detection tool, which can capture new types of problems concerning audio quality with high accuracy and minimum overhead, and perform stress testing on VoLTE call's reliability. We discover 3 instances of problems in the early deployment of VoLTE lying in the protocol design and implementation. Although the identified problems are all concerned with the immature LTE coverage in the current deployment, we find that they can cause serious impairment on user experience and are urgent to be solved in the developing stage. For example, one such instance can lead to up to 50-second-long muting problem during a VoLTE call! We perform in-depth cross-layer analysis and find that the causes are rooted in the lack of coordination among protocols designed for different purposes, and invalid assumptions made by protocols used in existing infrastructure when integrated with VoLTE. We summarize learnt lessons and suggest solutions.
Yunhan Jia, Qi Alfred Chen, Z. Morley Mao, Jie Hui, Kranthi Sontineni, Alex Yoon, Samson Kwong, Kevin Lau
MobiCom5
2014 QoE Doctor: Diagnosing Mobile App QoE with Automated UI Control and Cross-layer Analysis
abstract
Smartphones have become increasingly prevalent and important in our daily lives. To meet users' expectations about the Quality of Experience (QoE) of mobile applications (apps), it is essential to obtain a comprehensive understanding of app QoE and identify the critical factors that affect it. However, effectively and systematically studying the QoE of popular mobile apps such as Facebook and YouTube still remains a challenging task, largely due to a lack of a controlled and reproducible measurement methodology, and limited insight into the complex multi-layer dynamics of the system and network stacks.
Qi Alfred Chen, Haokun Luo, Sanae Rosen, Z. Morley Mao, Karthik Iyer, Jie Hui, Kranthi Sontineni, Kevin Lau
Internet Measurement Conference7