Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shekhar Sharma

dblp:161/0057 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video retrieval
0.212015
Multimedia Data for the Visually Impaired · AAAI 2015
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › video retrieval
video search reranking
0.212015
Multimedia Data for the Visually Impaired · AAAI 2015
Accessibility and assistive technology
accessible multimedia
0.212015
Multimedia Data for the Visually Impaired · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.4multimodal classification · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Multimedia Data for the Visually Impaired
abstract
The Web contains a large amount of information in the form of videos that remains inaccessible to the visually impaired people. We identify a class of videos whose information content can be approximately encoded as an audio, thereby increasing the amount of accessible videos. We propose a model to automatically identify such videos. Our model jointly relies on the textual metadata and visual content of the video. We use this model to re-rank Youtube video search results based on accessibility of the video. We present preliminary results by conducting a user study with visually impaired people to measure the effectiveness of our system.
Niket Tandon, Shekhar Sharma, Tanima Makkad
AAAI2