Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen Brawner
dblp:162/9924
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 50% User interface design and tools · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel Control · AAAI 2018 |
User interface design and tools
end-user programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Trigger-Action Programming in the Wild: An Analysis of 200, 000 IFTTT Recipes · CHI 2016 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
smart home |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Trigger-Action Programming in the Wild: An Analysis of 200, 000 IFTTT Recipes · CHI 2016 |
Energy systems and smart grids › energy harvesting
solar energy harvesting |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel Control · AAAI 2018 |
Energy systems and smart grids › renewable energy › solar energy
solar tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel Control · AAAI 2018 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Trigger-Action Programming in the Wild: An Analysis of 200, 000 IFTTT Recipes · CHI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bandit algorithms · 0.7scraping · 0.5dataset analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Bandit-Based Solar Panel ControlabstractSolar panels sustainably harvest energy from the sun. To improve performance, panels are often equipped with a tracking mechanism that computes the sun’s position in the sky throughout the day. Based on the tracker’s estimate of the sun’s location, a controller orients the panel to minimize the angle of incidence between solar radiant energy and the photovoltaic cells on the surface of the panel, increasing total energy harvested. Prior work has developed efficient tracking algorithms that accurately compute the sun’s location to facilitate solar tracking and control. However, always pointing a panel directly at the sun does not account for diffuse irradiance in the sky, reflected irradiance from the ground and surrounding surfaces, power required to reorient the panel, shading effects from neighboring panels and foliage, or changing weather conditions (such as clouds), all of which are contributing factors to the total energy harvested by a fleet of solar panels. In this work, we show that a bandit-based approach can increase the total energy harvested by solar panels by learning to dynamically account for such other factors. Our contribution is threefold: (1) the development of a test bed based on typical solar and irradiance models for experimenting with solar panel control using a variety of learning methods, (2) simulated validation that bandit algorithms can effectively learn to control solar panels, and (3) the design and construction of an intelligent solar panel prototype that learns to angle itself using bandit algorithms. David Abel, Edward C. Williams, Stephen Brawner, Emily Reif, Michael L. Littman |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Trigger-Action Programming in the Wild: An Analysis of 200, 000 IFTTT RecipesabstractWhile researchers have long investigated end-user programming using a trigger-action (if-then) model, the website IFTTT is among the first instances of this paradigm being used on a large scale. To understand what IFTTT users are creating, we scraped the 224,590 programs shared publicly on IFTTT as of September 2015 and are releasing this dataset to spur future research. We characterize aspects of these programs and the IFTTT ecosystem over time. We find a large number of users are crafting a diverse set of end-user programs---over 100,000 different users have shared programs. These programs represent a very broad array of connections that appear to fill gaps in functionality, yet users often duplicate others' programs. Blase Ur, Melwyn Pak Yong Ho, Stephen Brawner, Jiyun Lee, Sarah Mennicken, Noah Picard, Diane Schulze, Michael L. Littman |
CHI | 3 |
| 2016 | Feature-based Joint Planning and Norm Learning in Collaborative Games
Mark K. Ho, James MacGlashan, Amy Greenwald, Michael L. Littman, Elizabeth Hilliard, Carl Trimbach, Stephen Brawner, Josh Tenenbaum, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Joseph L. Austerweil |
CogSci | 7 |