Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jacob Kittley-Davies

dblp:167/8348 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Interaction techniques and input · 68% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 20% Usability and user experience research · 12%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input
visual feedback
0.412019
Evaluating the Effect of Feedback from Different Computer Vision Processing Stages: A Comparative Lab Study · CHI 2019
Network management and operations › network configuration
device configuration
0.212015
Connecting the things to the internet: an evaluation of four configuration strategies for wi-fi devices with minimal user interfaces · UbiComp 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
pattern matching
0.112019
Evaluating the Effect of Feedback from Different Computer Vision Processing Stages: A Comparative Lab Study · CHI 2019
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
feedback design
0.112019
Evaluating the Effect of Feedback from Different Computer Vision Processing Stages: A Comparative Lab Study · CHI 2019
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
usability study
0.112015
Connecting the things to the internet: an evaluation of four configuration strategies for wi-fi devices with minimal user interfaces · UbiComp 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 0.8lab study · 0.8usability study · 0.4comparative evaluation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Evaluating the Effect of Feedback from Different Computer Vision Processing Stages: A Comparative Lab Study
abstract
Computer vision and pattern recognition are increasingly being employed by smartphone and tablet applications targeted at lay-users. An open design challenge is to make such systems intelligible without requiring users to become technical experts. This paper reports a lab study examining the role of visual feedback. Our findings indicate that the stage of processing from which feedback is derived plays an important role in users' ability to develop coherent and correct understandings of a system's operation. Participants in our study showed a tendency to misunderstand the meaning being conveyed by the feedback, relating it to processing outcomes and higher level concepts, when in reality the feedback represented low level features. Drawing on the experimental results and the qualitative data collected, we discuss the challenges of designing interactions around pattern matching algorithms.
Jacob Kittley-Davies, Ahmed Alqaraawi, Rayoung Yang, Enrico Costanza, Alex Rogers, Sebastian Stein 0001
CHI1
2015 Connecting the things to the internet: an evaluation of four configuration strategies for wi-fi devices with minimal user interfaces
abstract
The availability of low-power Wi-Fi radio modules opens up opportunities to leverage the existing prevalent Wi-Fi infrastructure for large-scale trials and deployments of Ubicomp technology. In this paper we address the challenge of supporting end-users, especially when they are not technical experts, in connecting new low-power, low-cost Wi-Fi devices with very minimal UIs to an existing, secure Wi-Fi infrastructure. We report two usability studies through which 30 participants, with no formal technical training, compared 4 alternative configuration techniques, selected based on cost and consumption constraints, and on adoption in off-the-shelf products. Through an analysis of success rate and causes of failure, our results indicate that two techniques are noticeably more usable than others. These are a web-based configuration mechanism, where users connect to an access point on the Wi-Fi device, and one that makes use of a standard audio cable to connect a smartphone to the device to be configured.
Michael O. Jewell, Enrico Costanza, Jacob Kittley-Davies
UbiComp3