Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stacie Rohrbach

dblp:18/11459 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Immersive interaction · 41% Learning and educational technologies · 41% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 12%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Immersive interaction
augmented reality
0.312018
Experiential Augmentation: Uncovering The Meaning of Qualitative Visualizations when Applied to Augmented Objects · CHI 2018
Learning and educational technologies
intelligent tutoring systems
0.212013
Why interactive learning environments can have it all: resolving design conflicts between competing goals · CHI 2013
Learning and educational technologies
interactive learning environments
0.212013
Why interactive learning environments can have it all: resolving design conflicts between competing goals · CHI 2013
Design research and methods › design process
interdisciplinary design
0.012013
Why interactive learning environments can have it all: resolving design conflicts between competing goals · CHI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.7design recommendations · 0.7iterative design · 0.2classroom study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Experiential Augmentation: Uncovering The Meaning of Qualitative Visualizations when Applied to Augmented Objects
abstract
As we move toward commercial usage of ubiquitous computing and augmented reality, it is important to think about how computing should communicate with us when it is distributed in our environment. This paper proposes that qualitative indexical visualizations based on learned understanding of physical phenomena (Experiential Augmentation) can enhance our interaction design language and aid digital interfaces in communicating in a real-world context. We present a study that gathers data on how participants interpret such visualizations, and propose a model with which to analyze their responses. Finally, we also give a set of design recommendations for those interested in creating similar augmentations.
Dixon Lo, Dan Lockton, Stacie Rohrbach
CHI3
2013 Why interactive learning environments can have it all: resolving design conflicts between competing goals
abstract
Designing interactive learning environments (ILEs; e.g., intelligent tutoring systems, educational games, etc.) is a challenging interdisciplinary process that needs to satisfy multiple stakeholders. ILEs need to function in real educational settings (e.g., schools) in which a number of goals interact. Several instructional design methodologies exist to help developers address these goals. However, they often lead to conflicting recommendations. Due to the lack of an established methodology to resolve such conflicts, developers of ILEs have to rely on ad-hoc solutions. We present a principled methodology to resolve such conflicts. We build on a well-established design process for creating Cognitive Tutors, a highly effective type of ILE. We extend this process by integrating methods from multiple disciplines to resolve design conflicts. We illustrate our methodology's effectiveness by describing the iterative development of the Fractions Tutor, which has proven to be effective in classroom studies with 3,000 4th-6th graders.
Martina A. Rau, Vincent Aleven, Nikol Rummel, Stacie Rohrbach
CHI4
2012 Sense Making Alone Doesn't Do It: Fluency Matters Too! ITS Support for Robust Learning with Multiple Representations
Martina A. Rau, Vincent Aleven, Nikol Rummel, Stacie Rohrbach
ITS4