Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Li-Lun Wang
dblp:18/3399
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0009-0007-6341-4285ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 97% Trustworthy machine learning · 3% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
handwriting recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Language Online Handwriting Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › handwriting recognition
online handwriting recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Language Online Handwriting Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017 |
Interaction techniques and input
text entry |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Language Online Handwriting Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017 |
Machine learning and data management
explanation-based learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Explanation-Based Learning for Image Understanding · AAAI 2006 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
visual explanation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Explanation-Based Learning for Image Understanding · AAAI 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trainable segmentation · 0.6pruning · 0.6minimum error rate training · 0.6explanation-based learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Fast multi-language LSTM-based online handwriting recognitionabstractAbstract We describe an online handwriting system that is able to support 102 languages using a deep neural network architecture. This new system has completely replaced our previous segment-and-decode-based system and reduced the error rate by 20–40% relative for most languages. Further, we report new state-of-the-art results on IAM-OnDB for both the open and closed dataset setting. The system combines methods from sequence recognition with a new input encoding using Bézier curves. This leads to up to $$10\times $$ 10 × faster recognition times compared to our previous system. Through a series of experiments, we determine the optimal configuration of our models and report the results of our setup on a number of additional public datasets. Victor Carbune, Pedro Gonnet, Thomas Deselaers, Henry A. Rowley, Alexander N. Daryin, Marcos Calvo, Li-Lun Wang, Daniel Keysers, Sandro Feuz, Philippe Gervais |
Int. J. Document Anal. Recognit. | 7 |
| 2017 | Multi-Language Online Handwriting RecognitionabstractWe describe Google's online handwriting recognition system that currently supports 22 scripts and 97 languages. The system's focus is on fast, high-accuracy text entry for mobile, touch-enabled devices. We use a combination of state-of-the-art components and combine them with novel additions in a flexible framework. This architecture allows us to easily transfer improvements between languages and scripts. This made it possible to build recognizers for languages that, to the best of our knowledge, are not handled by any other online handwriting recognition system. The approach also enabled us to use the same architecture both on very powerful machines for recognition in the cloud as well as on mobile devices with more limited computational power by changing some of the settings of the system. In this paper we give a general overview of the system architecture and the novel components, such as unified time- and position-based input interpretation, trainable segmentation, minimum-error rate training for feature combination, and a cascade of pruning strategies. We present experimental results for different setups. The system is currently publicly available in several Google products, for example in Google Translate and as an input method for Android devices. Daniel Keysers, Thomas Deselaers, Henry A. Rowley, Li-Lun Wang, Victor Carbune |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2010 | Automatic Model Adaptation for Complex Structured Domains
Geoffrey Levine, Gerald DeJong, Li-Lun Wang, Rajhans Samdani, Shankar Vembu, Dan Roth 0001 |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 3 |
| 2009 | Integrating prior domain knowledge into discriminative learning using automatic model construction and phantom examples
Shiau Hong Lim, Li-Lun Wang, Gerald DeJong |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |
| 2007 | Explanation-Based Feature Construction
Shiau Hong Lim, Li-Lun Wang, Gerald DeJong |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2007 | Robustness through prior knowledge: using explanation-based learning to distinguish handwritten Chinese characters
Li-Lun Wang, Shiau Hong Lim, Gerald DeJong |
Int. J. Document Anal. Recognit. | 2 |
| 2006 | Explanation-Based Learning for Image Understanding
Li-Lun Wang, Gerald DeJong |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2003 | Radius Margin Bounds for Support Vector Machines with the RBF KernelabstractAn important approach for efficient support vector machine (SVM) model selection is to use differentiable bounds of the leave-one-out (loo) error. Past efforts focused on finding tight bounds of loo (e.g., radius margin bounds, span bounds). However, their practical viability is still not very satisfactory. Duan, Keerthi, and Poo (2003) showed that radius margin bound gives good prediction for L2-SVM, one of the cases we look at. In this letter, through analyses about why this bound performs well for L2-SVM, we show that finding a bound whose minima are in a region with small loo values may be more important than its tightness. Based on this principle, we propose modified radius margin bounds for L1-SVM (the other case) where the original bound is applicable only to the hard-margin case. Our modification for L1-SVM achieves comparable performance to L2-SVM. To study whether L1- or L2-SVM should be used, we analyze other properties, such as their differentiability, number of support vectors, and number of free support vectors. In this aspect, L1-SVM possesses the advantage of having fewer support vectors. Their implementations are also different, so we discuss related issues in detail. Kai-Min Chung, Wei-Chun Kao, Chia-Liang Sun, Li-Lun Wang, Chih-Jen Lin |
Neural Comput. | 4 |