Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Junhyeok Kim 0002
dblp:188/1897-2
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-8650-4229ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Vision and language · 39% Question answering and dialogue systems · 7% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement model · NeurIPS 2025 See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
attention head analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal dialogue |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Speaking Beyond Language: A Large-Scale Multimodal Dataset for Learning Nonverbal Cues from Video-Grounded Dialogues · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement model · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › multimodal dialogue system
video-grounded dialogue |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Speaking Beyond Language: A Large-Scale Multimodal Dataset for Learning Nonverbal Cues from Video-Grounded Dialogues · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
vision transformer explainability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement model · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
visual attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding · CVPR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Reading Books is Great, But Not if You Are Driving! Visually Grounded Reasoning about Defeasible Commonsense Norms · EMNLP 2023 |
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology for visual impairment
assistive technology for blind and low-vision users |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | GuideDog: A Real-World Egocentric Multimodal Dataset for Blind and Low-Vision Accessibility-Aware Guidance · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text-to-image attention · 0.9sparse autoencoder · 0.9residual replacement · 0.9multimodal learning · 0.9attention redistribution · 0.9attention map · 0.9large language model · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | GuideDog: A Real-World Egocentric Multimodal Dataset for Blind and Low-Vision Accessibility-Aware GuidanceabstractJunhyeok Kim, Jaewoo Park, Junhee Park, Sangeyl Lee, Jiwan Chung, Jisung Kim, Ji Hoon Joung, Youngjae Yu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Junhyeok Kim 0002, Jaewoo Park 0003, Junhee Park, Sangeyl Lee, Jiwan Chung, Jisung Kim, Ji Hoon Joung, Youngjae Yu |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Speaking Beyond Language: A Large-Scale Multimodal Dataset for Learning Nonverbal Cues from Video-Grounded DialoguesabstractYoungmin Kim, Jiwan Chung, Jisoo Kim, Sunghyun Lee, Sangkyu Lee, Junhyeok Kim, Cheoljong Yang, Youngjae Yu. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Jiwan Chung, Jisoo Kim 0006, Sunghyun Lee 0001, Sangkyu Lee, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Cheoljong Yang, Youngjae Yu |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2025 | Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual GroundingabstractVisual grounding seeks to localize the image region corresponding to a free-form text description. Recently, the strong multimodal capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have driven substantial improvements in visual grounding, though they inevitably require fine-tuning and additional model components to explicitly generate bounding boxes or segmentation masks. However, we discover that a few attention heads in frozen LVLMs demonstrate strong visual grounding capabilities. We refer to these heads, which consistently capture object locations related to text semantics, as localization heads. Using localization heads, we introduce a straightforward and effective training-free visual grounding framework that utilizes text-to-image attention maps from localization heads to identify the target objects. Surprisingly, only three out of thousands of attention heads are sufficient to achieve competitive localization performance compared to existing LVLM-based visual grounding methods that require fine-tuning. Our findings suggest that LVLMs can innately ground objects based on a deep comprehension of the text-image relationship, as they implicitly focus on relevant image regions to generate informative text outputs. Seil Kang, Jinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Seong Jae Hwang |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal ModelsabstractLarge multimodal models (LMMs) "see" images by leveraging the attention mechanism between text and visual tokens in the transformer decoder. Ideally, these models should focus on key visual information relevant to the text token. However, recent findings indicate that LMMs have an extraordinary tendency to consistently allocate high attention weights to specific visual tokens, even when these tokens are irrelevant to the corresponding text. In this study, we investigate the property behind the appearance of these irrelevant visual tokens and examine their characteristics. Our findings show that this behavior arises due to the massive activation of certain hidden state dimensions, which resembles the attention sink found in language models. Hence, we refer to this phenomenon as the visual attention sink. In particular, our analysis reveals that removing the irrelevant visual sink tokens does not impact model performance, despite receiving high attention weights. Consequently, we recycle the attention to these tokens as surplus resources, redistributing the attention budget to enhance focus on the image. To achieve this, we introduce Visual Attention Redistribution (VAR), a method that redistributes attention in image-centric heads, which we identify as innately focusing on visual information. VAR can be seamlessly applied across different LMMs to improve performance on a wide range of tasks, including general vision-language tasks, visual hallucination tasks, and vision-centric tasks, all without the need for additional training, models, or inference steps. Experimental results demonstrate that VAR enables LMMs to process visual information more effectively by adjusting their internal attention mechanisms, offering a new direction to enhancing the multimodal capabilities of LMMs. Seil Kang, Jinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Seong Jae Hwang |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement modelabstractHow do vision transformers (ViTs) represent and process the world? This paper addresses this long-standing question through the first systematic analysis of 6.6K features across all layers, extracted via sparse autoencoders, and by introducing the residual replacement model, which replaces ViT computations with interpretable features in the residual stream. Our analysis reveals not only a feature evolution from low-level patterns to high-level semantics, but also how ViTs encode curves and spatial positions through specialized feature types. The residual replacement model scalably produces a faithful yet parsimonious circuit for human-scale interpretability by significantly simplifying the original computations. As a result, this framework enables intuitive understanding of ViT mechanisms. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our framework in debiasing spurious correlations. Jinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Yumin Shim, Joohyeok Kim, Sunyoung Jung, Seong Jae Hwang |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Reading Books is Great, But Not if You Are Driving! Visually Grounded Reasoning about Defeasible Commonsense NormsabstractCommonsense norms are defeasible by context: reading books is usually great, but not when driving a car.While contexts can be explicitly described in language, in embodied scenarios, contexts are often provided visually.This type of visually grounded reasoning about defeasible commonsense norms is generally easy for humans, but (as we show) poses a challenge for machines, as it necessitates both visual understanding and reasoning about commonsense norms.We construct a new multimodal benchmark for studying visual-grounded commonsense norms: NORMLENS.NORMLENS consists of 10K human judgments accompanied by freeform explanations covering 2K multimodal situations, and serves as a probe to address two questions: (1) to what extent can models align with average human judgment?and (2) how well can models explain their predicted judgments?We find that state-of-theart model judgments and explanations are not well-aligned with human annotation.Additionally, we present a new approach to better align models with humans by distilling social commonsense knowledge from large language models.The data and code are released at https://seungjuhan.me/normlens. Seungju Han 0002, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Jack Hessel, Jiwan Chung, Yejin Son, Yejin Choi 0001, Youngjae Yu |
EMNLP | 2 |