Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pedro Colon-Hernandez

dblp:191/0560 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › text analysis › discourse analysis
narrative analysis
0.712023
Modeling Empathic Similarity in Personal Narratives · EMNLP 2023
Human-robot interaction
intention recognition
0.512021
Practical Guidelines for Intent Recognition: BERT with Minimal Training Data Evaluated in Real-World HRI Application · HRI 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › transformer fine-tuning
BERT fine-tuning
0.112021
Practical Guidelines for Intent Recognition: BERT with Minimal Training Data Evaluated in Real-World HRI Application · HRI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 2.0fine-tuning · 2.0BiLSTM · 1.0BERT · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Modeling Empathic Similarity in Personal Narratives
abstract
The most meaningful connections between people are often fostered through expression of shared vulnerability and emotional experiences in personal narratives.We introduce a new task of identifying similarity in personal stories based on empathic resonance, i.e., the extent to which two people empathize with each others' experiences, as opposed to raw semantic or lexical similarity, as has predominantly been studied in NLP.Using insights from social psychology, we craft a framework that operationalizes empathic similarity in terms of three key features of stories: main events, emotional trajectories, and overall morals or takeaways.We create EM-PATHICSTORIES, a dataset of 1,500 personal stories annotated with our empathic similarity features, and 2,000 pairs of stories annotated with empathic similarity scores.Using our dataset, we finetune a model to compute empathic similarity of story pairs, and show that this outperforms semantic similarity models on automated correlation and retrieval metrics.Through a user study with 150 participants, we also assess the effect our model has on retrieving stories that users empathize with, compared to naive semantic similarity-based retrieval, and find that participants empathized significantly more with stories retrieved by our model.Our work has strong implications for the use of empathy-aware models to foster human connection and empathy between people.
Jocelyn Shen, Maarten Sap, Pedro Colon-Hernandez, Hae Park, Cynthia Breazeal
EMNLP3
2021 Practical Guidelines for Intent Recognition: BERT with Minimal Training Data Evaluated in Real-World HRI Application
abstract
Intent recognition models, which match a written or spoken input's class in order to guide an interaction, are an essential part of modern voice user interfaces, chatbots, and social robots. However, getting enough data to train these models can be very expensive and challenging, especially when designing novel applications such as real-world human-robot interactions. In this work, we first investigate how much training data is needed for high performance in an intent classification task. We train and evaluate BiLSTM and BERT models on various subsets of the ATIS and Snips datasets. We find that only 25 training examples per intent are required for our BERT model to achieve 94% intent accuracy compared to 98% with the entire datasets, challenging the belief that large amounts of labeled data are required for high performance in intent recognition. We apply this knowledge to train models for a real-world HRI application, character strength recognition during a positive psychology interaction with a social robot, and evaluate against the Character Strength dataset collected in our previous HRI study. Our real-world HRI application results also confirm that our model can produce 76% intent accuracy with 25 examples per intent compared to 80% with 100 examples. In a real-world scenario, the difference is only one additional error per 25 classifications. Finally, we investigate the limitations of our minimal data models and offer suggestions on developing high quality datasets. We conclude with practical guidelines for training BERT intent recognition models with minimal training data and make our code and evaluation framework available for others to replicate our results and easily develop models for their own applications.
Matthew Huggins, Sharifa Alghowinem, Sooyeon Jeong, Pedro Colon-Hernandez, Cynthia Breazeal, Hae Won Park 0001
HRI4