Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Masato Kurosawa

dblp:198/3864 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality › locomotion
virtual walking
0.112017
Evaluation of airflow effect on a VR walk · VR 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual presentation · 0.6vestibular stimulation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Evaluation of airflow effect on a VR walk
abstract
The present study investigates the augmentation effect of airflow on the sensation of a virtual reality walk. The intensity of cutaneous sensation evoked by airflow during the real and virtual walk was measured. The airflow stimulus was added to the participant with passive vestibular motion and visual presentation. The result suggests that the sensation of walking was strongly increased by adding the airflow stimulus to the vestibular and optic presentations. The cutaneous sensation of airflow was perceived higher for the sitting participant than during a real walk in both a single and the combined stimuli. The equivalent speed of airflow for the sitting participant was lowered from the airflow speed in the real walk.
Masato Kurosawa, Ken Ito, Yasushi Ikei, Koichi Hirota, Michiteru Kitazaki
VR1