Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henrik Artman

dblp:20/3399 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-6903-9072ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Collaborative and social computing · 93% Human-AI interaction · 7%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.212015
Computer Support for Financial Advisors and Their Clients: Co-creating an Investment Plan · CSCW 2015
Collaborative and social computing › cooperative work
group decision-making
0.212015
Computer Support for Financial Advisors and Their Clients: Co-creating an Investment Plan · CSCW 2015
Collaborative and social computing › computer-supported cooperative work › work practice
workplace studies
0.212015
Computer Support for Financial Advisors and Their Clients: Co-creating an Investment Plan · CSCW 2015
Requirements engineering and software design
user-centered design
0.212013
The secret life of a persona: when the personal becomes private · CHI 2013
Human-AI interaction
decision support
0.112015
Computer Support for Financial Advisors and Their Clients: Co-creating an Investment Plan · CSCW 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study · 0.3observation · 0.2interviews · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 A Census of Swedish Government Administrative Authority Employee Communications on Cybersecurity during the COVID-19 Pandemic
abstract
Cybersecurity is the backbone of a successful digitalization of society, and cyber situation awareness is an essential aspect of managing it. The COVID-19 pandemic has sped up an already ongoing digitalization of Swedish government agencies, but the cybersecurity maturity level varies across agencies. In this study, we conduct a census of Swedish government administrative authority communications on cybersecurity to employees at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The census shows that the employee communications in the beginning of the pandemic to a greater extent have focused on first-order risks, such as video meetings and telecommuting, rather than on second-order risks, such as invoice fraud or social engineering. We also find that almost two thirds of the administrative authorities have not yet implemented, but only initiated or documented, their cybersecurity policies.
Annika Andreasson, Henrik Artman, Joel Brynielsson, Ulrik Franke
ASONAM2
2015 Computer Support for Financial Advisors and Their Clients: Co-creating an Investment Plan
abstract
This paper is a workplace study of how financial advisors use their computer systems in advisory meetings with clients, with special focus on the collaborative decision-making. Observations and interviews show that the financial advisors in the study were not much helped by their computer system in visualizing and explaining financial concepts to their clients, and that not all of them trusted the system's decision support feature. Furthermore, client meetings can involve more than one client, which has further implications for the design of financial decision support.
Susanna Heyman, Henrik Artman
CSCW2
2014 The security awareness paradox: A case study
abstract
Knowledge-intensive organizations are characterized by their dependency on highly skilled personnel who perform their daily work in a decentralized manner. In these organizations it is the users who make the important decisions, and therefore the organization's information security awareness is upheld by and depends on its users' combined security awareness. To assess the overall organizational security awareness it therefore becomes interesting to assess both the users' individual level of security awareness, as well as their level of consistency and conformity with regard to other users' awareness. In the present case study, 15 semi-structured interviews have been undertaken within a large telecommunication company in order to understand how significant IT security aspects are understood within the organization. The study highlights a number of perception differences where the technical IT staff and the ordinary users do not share the same understanding. It is suggested that these perception differences result from a paradoxical situation where the users' possibility to uphold security awareness is hindered because of security concerns.
Muhammad Adnan Tariq, Joel Brynielsson, Henrik Artman
ASONAM3
2013 The secret life of a persona: when the personal becomes private
abstract
Some organizations fail to involve users in systems development due to a widespread organization, high workload or secrecy issues. A remedy against this situation could be the persona method in which users and main stakeholders as represented as fictitious characters. Personas help eliciting user needs and requirements, facilitate design choices and are an overall communication aid where users cannot be present. An important part of the persona method, as portrayed in literature, is the personal details that make the personas trustworthy and alive. In this paper we present two cases in which personas have been developed and used, but where the personal is scarce or even non-existent because of a dispersed organisation, the organisational culture and secrecy issues. The paper describes how the personas were developed, used and received and how the method was altered in order to work in these special circumstances.
Elina Eriksson, Henrik Artman, Anna Swartling
CHI2