Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rahul Aralikatte
dblp:202/8441
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
6as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 6 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 42% Language models and text generation · 39% Question answering and dialogue systems · 12% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Compilers and program optimization · 77% Services computing and microservices · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
User interface design and tools · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Joint Semantic Analysis with Document-Level Cross-Task Coherence Rewards · AAAI 2021 Rewarding Coreference Resolvers for Being Consistent with World Knowledge · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
multilingual language resources |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Leaving No Indic Language Behind: Building Monolingual Corpora, Benchmark and Models for Indic Languages · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Focus Attention: Promoting Faithfulness and Diversity in Summarization · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › abstractive summarization
faithful summarization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Focus Attention: Promoting Faithfulness and Diversity in Summarization · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Joint Semantic Analysis with Document-Level Cross-Task Coherence Rewards · AAAI 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
chinese word segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sanskrit Sandhi Splitting using seq2(seq)2 · EMNLP 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Hi, How Can I Help You?: Automating Enterprise IT Support Help Desks · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | DuoRC: Towards Complex Language Understanding with Paraphrased Reading Comprehension · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | DuoRC: Towards Complex Language Understanding with Paraphrased Reading Comprehension · ACL (1) 2018 |
User interface design and tools
visual programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Democratization of Deep Learning Using DARVIZ · AAAI 2018 |
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Democratization of Deep Learning Using DARVIZ · AAAI 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › background knowledge
world knowledge |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Rewarding Coreference Resolvers for Being Consistent with World Knowledge · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | DuoRC: Towards Complex Language Understanding with Paraphrased Reading Comprehension · ACL (1) 2018 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › lexical retrieval
bag-of-words retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Hi, How Can I Help You?: Automating Enterprise IT Support Help Desks · AAAI 2018 |
Services computing and microservices › service management
IT service management |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Agent Assist: Automating Enterprise IT Support Help Desks · AAAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual editor · 0.7natural language processing · 0.7knowledge graph · 0.7code generation · 0.7bag-of-words search · 0.7agent assistance · 0.7reinforcement learning · 0.5graph neural network · 0.5attention mechanism · 0.5consistency reward · 0.4neural reading comprehension models · 0.3deep learning classifiers · 0.3deep learning classifier · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Towards Leaving No Indic Language Behind: Building Monolingual Corpora, Benchmark and Models for Indic LanguagesabstractSumanth Doddapaneni, Rahul Aralikatte, Gowtham Ramesh, Shreya Goyal, Mitesh M. Khapra, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Pratyush Kumar. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Sumanth Doddapaneni, Rahul Aralikatte, Gowtham Ramesh, Shreya Goyal, Mitesh M. Khapra, Anoop Kunchukuttan |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Towards Better Evaluation of Instruction-Following: A Case-Study in SummarizationabstractDespite recent advances, evaluating how well large language models (LLMs) follow user instructions remains an open problem.While evaluation methods of language models have seen a rise in prompt-based approaches, limited work on the correctness of these methods has been conducted.In this work, we perform a meta-evaluation of a variety of metrics to quantify how accurately they measure the instruction-following abilities of LLMs.Our investigation is performed on grounded query-based summarization by collecting a new short-form, real-world dataset riSum, containing 300 document-instruction pairs with 3 answers each.All 900 answers are rated by 3 human annotators.Using riSum, we analyze the agreement between evaluation methods and human judgment.Finally, we propose new LLMbased reference-free evaluation methods that improve upon established baselines and perform on par with costly reference-based metrics that require high-quality summaries. Ondrej Skopek, Rahul Aralikatte, Sian Gooding, Victor Carbune |
CoNLL | 2 |
| 2022 | Compositional Generalization in Multilingual Semantic Parsing over WikidataabstractAbstract Semantic parsing (SP) allows humans to leverage vast knowledge resources through natural interaction. However, parsers are mostly designed for and evaluated on English resources, such as CFQ (Keysers et al., 2020), the current standard benchmark based on English data generated from grammar rules and oriented towards Freebase, an outdated knowledge base. We propose a method for creating a multilingual, parallel dataset of question-query pairs, grounded in Wikidata. We introduce such a dataset, which we call Multilingual Compositional Wikidata Questions (MCWQ), and use it to analyze the compositional generalization of semantic parsers in Hebrew, Kannada, Chinese, and English. While within- language generalization is comparable across languages, experiments on zero-shot cross- lingual transfer demonstrate that cross-lingual compositional generalization fails, even with state-of-the-art pretrained multilingual encoders. Furthermore, our methodology, dataset, and results will facilitate future research on SP in more realistic and diverse settings than has been possible with existing resources. Ruixiang Cui, Rahul Aralikatte, Heather C. Lent, Daniel Hershcovich |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2021 | Joint Semantic Analysis with Document-Level Cross-Task Coherence RewardsabstractCoreference resolution and semantic role labeling are NLP tasks that capture different aspects of semantics, indicating respectively, which expressions refer to the same entity, and what semantic roles expressions serve in the sentence. However, they are often closely interdependent, and both generally necessitate natural language understanding. Do they form a coherent abstract representation of documents? We present a neural network architecture for joint coreference resolution and semantic role labeling for English, and train graph neural networks to model the 'coherence' of the combined shallow semantic graph. Using the resulting coherence score as a reward for our joint semantic analyzer, we use reinforcement learning to encourage global coherence over the document and between semantic annotations. This leads to improvements on both tasks in multiple datasets from different domains, and across a range of encoders of different expressivity, calling, we believe, for a more holistic approach for semantics in NLP. Rahul Aralikatte, Mostafa Abdou, Heather C. Lent, Daniel Hershcovich, Anders Søgaard |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Focus Attention: Promoting Faithfulness and Diversity in SummarizationabstractRahul Aralikatte, Shashi Narayan, Joshua Maynez, Sascha Rothe, Ryan McDonald. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Rahul Aralikatte, Shashi Narayan, Joshua Maynez, Sascha Rothe, Ryan T. McDonald |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | Ellipsis Resolution as Question Answering: An EvaluationabstractMost, if not all forms of ellipsis (e.g., 'so does Mary') are similar to reading comprehension questions ('what does Mary do'), in that in order to resolve them, we need to identify an appropriate text span in the preceding discourse.Following this observation, we present an alternative approach for English ellipsis resolution relying on architectures developed for question answering (QA).We present both single-task models, and joint models trained on auxiliary QA and coreference resolution datasets, clearly outperforming the current state of the art for Sluice Ellipsis (from 70.00 to 86.01 F 1 ) and Verb Phrase Ellipsis (from 72.89 to 78.66 F 1 ). Rahul Aralikatte, Matthew Lamm, Daniel Hardt, Anders Søgaard |
EACL | 1 |
| 2020 | Model-based Annotation of CoreferenceabstractHumans do not make inferences over texts, but over models of what texts are about. When annotators are asked to annotate coreferent spans of text, it is therefore a somewhat unnatural task. This paper presents an alternative in which we preprocess documents, linking entities to a knowledge base, and turn the coreference annotation task – in our case limited to pronouns – into an annotation task where annotators are asked to assign pronouns to entities. Model-based annotation is shown to lead to faster annotation and higher inter-annotator agreement, and we argue that it also opens up an alternative approach to coreference resolution. We present two new coreference benchmark datasets, for English Wikipedia and English teacher-student dialogues, and evaluate state-of-the-art coreference resolvers on them. Rahul Aralikatte, Anders Søgaard |
LREC | 1 |
| 2019 | Compositional Generalization in Image CaptioningabstractImage captioning models are usually evaluated on their ability to describe a held-out set of images, not on their ability to generalize to unseen concepts.We study the problem of compositional generalization, which measures how well a model composes unseen combinations of concepts when describing images.Stateof-the-art image captioning models show poor generalization performance on this task.We propose a multi-task model to address the poor performance, that combines caption generation and image-sentence ranking, and uses a decoding mechanism that re-ranks the captions according their similarity to the image.This model is substantially better at generalizing to unseen combinations of concepts compared to state-of-the-art captioning models. Mitja Nikolaus, Mostafa Abdou, Matthew Lamm, Rahul Aralikatte, Desmond Elliott |
CoNLL | 4 |
| 2019 | Rewarding Coreference Resolvers for Being Consistent with World KnowledgeabstractRahul Aralikatte, Heather Lent, Ana Valeria Gonzalez, Daniel Herschcovich, Chen Qiu, Anders Sandholm, Michael Ringaard, Anders Søgaard. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Rahul Aralikatte, Heather C. Lent, Ana Valeria González-Garduño, Daniel Hershcovich, Chen Qiu 0005, Anders Sandholm 0001, Michael Ringaard, Anders Søgaard |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Adversarial Black-Box Attacks on Automatic Speech Recognition Systems Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary OptimizationabstractFooling deep neural networks with adversarial input have exposed a significant vulnerability in the current state-of-the-art systems in multiple domains. Both black-box and white-box approaches have been used to either replicate the model itself or to craft examples which cause the model to fail. In this work, we propose a framework which uses multi-objective evolutionary optimization to perform both targeted and un-targeted black-box attacks on Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems. We apply this framework on two ASR systems: Deepspeech and Kaldi-ASR, which increases the Word Error Rates (WER) of these systems by upto 980%, indicating the potency of our approach. During both un-targeted and targeted attacks, the adversarial samples maintain a high acoustic similarity of 0.98 and 0.97 with the original audio. Shreya Khare, Rahul Aralikatte, Senthil Mani |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |
| 2018 | Hi, How Can I Help You?: Automating Enterprise IT Support Help DesksabstractQuestion answering is one of the primary challenges of natural language understanding. In realizing such a system, providing complex long answers to questions is a challenging task as opposed to factoid answering as the former needs context disambiguation. The different methods explored in the literature can be broadly classified into three categories namely: 1) classification based, 2) knowledge graph based and 3) retrieval based. Individually, none of them address the need of an enterprise wide assistance system for an IT support and maintenance domain. In this domain, the variance of answers is large ranging from factoid to structured operating procedures; the knowledge is present across heterogeneous data sources like application specific documentation, ticket management systems and any single technique for a general purpose assistance is unable to scale for such a landscape. To address this, we have built a cognitive platform with capabilities adopted for this domain. Further, we have built a general purpose question answering system leveraging the platform that can be instantiated for multiple products, technologies in the support domain. The system uses a novel hybrid answering model that orchestrates across a deep learning classifier, a knowledge graph based context disambiguation module and a sophisticated bag-of-words search system. This orchestration performs context switching for a provided question and also does a smooth hand-off of the question to a human expert if none of the automated techniques can provide a confident answer. This system has been deployed across 675 internal enterprise IT support and maintenance projects. Senthil Mani, Neelamadhav Gantayat, Rahul Aralikatte, Monika Gupta 0002, Sampath Dechu, Anush Sankaran, Shreya Khare, Barry Mitchell, Hemamalini Subramanian, Hema Venkatarangan |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2018 | Agent Assist: Automating Enterprise IT Support Help Desks
Senthil Mani, Neelamadhav Gantayat, Rahul Aralikatte, Monika Gupta 0002, Sampath Dechu, Anush Sankaran, Shreya Khare, Barry Mitchell, Hemamalini Subramanian, Hema Venkatarangan |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2018 | Democratization of Deep Learning Using DARVIZabstractWith an abundance of research papers in deep learning, adoption and reproducibility of existing works becomes a challenge. To make a DL developer life easy, we propose a novel system, DARVIZ, to visually design a DL model using a drag-and-drop framework in an platform agnostic manner. The code could be automatically generated in both Caffe and Keras. DARVIZ could import (i) any existing Caffe code, or (ii) a research paper containing a DL design; extract the design, and present it in visual editor. Anush Sankaran, Naveen Panwar, Shreya Khare, Senthil Mani, Akshay Sethi, Rahul Aralikatte, Neelamadhav Gantayat |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2018 | DuoRC: Towards Complex Language Understanding with Paraphrased Reading ComprehensionabstractWe propose DuoRC, a novel dataset for Reading Comprehension (RC) that motivates several new challenges for neural approaches in language understanding beyond those offered by existing RC datasets.DuoRC contains 186,089 unique questionanswer pairs created from a collection of 7680 pairs of movie plots where each pair in the collection reflects two versions of the same movie -one from Wikipedia and the other from IMDb -written by two different authors.We asked crowdsourced workers to create questions from one version of the plot and a different set of workers to extract or synthesize answers from the other version.This unique characteristic of DuoRC where questions and answers are created from different versions of a document narrating the same underlying story, ensures by design, that there is very little lexical overlap between the questions created from one version and the segments containing the answer in the other version.Further, since the two versions have different levels of plot detail, narration style, vocabulary, etc., answering questions from the second version requires deeper language understanding and incorporating external background knowledge.Additionally, the narrative style of passages arising from movie plots (as opposed to typical descriptive passages in existing datasets) exhibits the need to perform complex reasoning over events across multiple sentences.Indeed, we observe that state-of-the-art neural RC models which have achieved near human performance on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016b), even when coupled with tra-ditional NLP techniques to address the challenges presented in DuoRC exhibit very poor performance (F1 score of 37.42% on DuoRC v/s 86% on SQuAD dataset).This opens up several interesting research avenues wherein DuoRC could complement other RC datasets to explore novel neural approaches for studying language understanding. Amrita Saha, Rahul Aralikatte, Mitesh M. Khapra, Karthik Sankaranarayanan |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2018 | Sanskrit Sandhi Splitting using seq2(seq)2abstractIn Sanskrit, small words (morphemes) are combined to form compound words through a process known as Sandhi.Sandhi splitting is the process of splitting a given compound word into its constituent morphemes.Although rules governing word splitting exists in the language, it is highly challenging to identify the location of the splits in a compound word.Though existing Sandhi splitting systems incorporate these pre-defined splitting rules, they have a low accuracy as the same compound word might be broken down in multiple ways to provide syntactically correct splits.In this research, we propose a novel deep learning architecture called Double Decoder RNN (DD-RNN), which (i) predicts the location of the split(s) with 95% accuracy, and (ii) predicts the constituent words (learning the Sandhi splitting rules) with 79.5% accuracy, outperforming the state-of-art by 20%.Additionally, we show the generalization capability of our deep learning model, by showing competitive results in the problem of Chinese word segmentation, as well. Rahul Aralikatte, Neelamadhav Gantayat, Naveen Panwar, Anush Sankaran, Senthil Mani |
EMNLP | 1 |