VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kundan Krishna
dblp:207/7773
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1601-1017ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 62% Representation and self-supervised learning · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction › human-centered AI
human-AI alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
conditional language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Downstream Datasets Make Surprisingly Good Pretraining Corpora · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
pre-training objectives |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Downstream Datasets Make Surprisingly Good Pretraining Corpora · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › biomedical summarization
clinical summarization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generating SOAP Notes from Doctor-Patient Conversations Using Modular Summarization Techniques · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generating SOAP Notes from Doctor-Patient Conversations Using Modular Summarization Techniques · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Downstream Datasets Make Surprisingly Good Pretraining Corpora · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › electronic health records
clinical documentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Generating SOAP Notes from Doctor-Patient Conversations Using Modular Summarization Techniques · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
modular summarization · 1.0systematic review · 0.9transformer · 0.7selective generation · 0.7out-of-distribution detection · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI AlignmentabstractRecent advances in general-purpose AI underscore the urgent need to align AI systems with human goals and values. Yet, the lack of a clear, shared understanding of what constitutes "alignment" limits meaningful progress and cross-disciplinary collaboration. In this position paper, we argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI. Through a systematic review of over 400 papers spanning HCI, NLP, ML, and more, we examine how alignment is currently defined and operationalized. Building on this analysis, we introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI – supporting cognitive, behavioral, and societal adaptation to rapidly advancing AI technologies. Our findings reveal significant gaps in current literature, especially in long-term interaction design, human value modeling, and mutual understanding. We conclude with three central challenges and actionable recommendations to guide future research toward more nuanced, reciprocal, and human-AI alignment approaches. Hua Shen 0005, Tiffany Knearem, Reshmi Ghosh, Kenan Alkiek, Kundan Krishna, Yachuan Liu, Savvas Petridis, Yi-Hao Peng, Li Qiwei, Chenglei Si, Yutong Xie 0007, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Frank Bentley, Joyce Y. Chai, Zachary C. Lipton, Qiaozhu Mei, Michael Terry, Diyi Yang, Meredith Ringel Morris, Paul Resnick, David Jurgens |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Downstream Datasets Make Surprisingly Good Pretraining CorporaabstractFor most natural language processing tasks, the dominant practice is to finetune large pretrained transformer models (e.g., BERT) using smaller downstream datasets.Despite the success of this approach, it remains unclear to what extent these gains are attributable to the massive background corpora employed for pretraining versus to the pretraining objectives themselves.This paper introduces a large-scale study of self-pretraining, where the same (downstream) training data is used for both pretraining and finetuning.In experiments addressing both ELECTRA and RoBERTa models and 10 distinct downstream classification datasets, we observe that self-pretraining rivals standard pretraining on the BookWiki corpus (despite using around 10×-500× less data), outperforming the latter on 7 and 5 datasets, respectively.Surprisingly, these task-specific pretrained models often perform well on other tasks, including the GLUE benchmark.Self-pretraining also provides benefits on structured output prediction tasks such as question answering and commonsense inference, often providing more than 50% improvements compared to standard pretraining.Our results hint that often performance gains attributable to pretraining are driven primarily by the pretraining objective itself and are not always attributable to the use of external pretraining data in massive amounts.These findings are especially relevant in light of concerns about intellectual property and offensive content in web-scale pretraining data. 1 Kundan Krishna, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Zachary C. Lipton |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models
Jie Ren 0006, Jiaming Luo, Kundan Krishna, Mohammad Saleh, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Peter J. Liu |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | Generating SOAP Notes from Doctor-Patient Conversations Using Modular Summarization TechniquesabstractKundan Krishna, Sopan Khosla, Jeffrey Bigham, Zachary C. Lipton. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Kundan Krishna, Sopan Khosla, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Zachary C. Lipton |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Reinforced Rewards Framework for Text Style Transfer
Abhilasha Sancheti, Kundan Krishna, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan, Anandhavelu Natarajan |
ECIR (1) | 2 |
| 2018 | Vocabulary Tailored Summary GenerationabstractNeural sequence-to-sequence models have been successfully extended for summary generation. However, existing frameworks generate a single summary for a given input and do not tune the summaries towards any additional constraints/preferences. Such a tunable framework is desirable to account for linguistic preferences of the specific audience who will consume the summary. In this paper, we propose a neural framework to generate summaries constrained to a vocabulary-defined linguistic preferences of a target audience. The proposed method accounts for the generation context by tuning the summary words at the time of generation. Our evaluations indicate that the proposed approach tunes summaries to the target vocabulary while still maintaining a superior summary quality against a state-of-the-art word embedding based lexical substitution algorithm, suggesting the feasibility of the proposed approach. We demonstrate two applications of the proposed approach - to generate understandable summaries with simpler words, and readable summaries with shorter words. Kundan Krishna, Aniket Murhekar, Saumitra Sharma, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan |
COLING | 1 |
| 2018 | Corpus-based Content ConstructionabstractEnterprise content writers are engaged in writing textual content for various purposes. Often, the text being written may already be present in the enterprise corpus in the form of past articles and can be re-purposed for the current needs. In the absence of suitable tools, authors manually curate/create such content (sometimes from scratch) which reduces their productivity. To address this, we propose an automatic approach to generate an initial version of the author’s intended text based on an input content snippet. Starting with a set of extracted textual fragments related to the snippet based on the query words in it, the proposed approach builds the desired text from these fragment by simultaneously optimizing the information coverage, relevance, diversity and coherence in the generated content. Evaluations on standard datasets shows improved performance against existing baselines on several metrics. Balaji Vasan Srinivasan, Pranav Maneriker, Kundan Krishna, Natwar Modani |
COLING | 3 |
| 2018 | Generating Topic-Oriented Summaries Using Neural AttentionabstractKundan Krishna, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018. Kundan Krishna, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |