Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luke Bhan

dblp:207/8462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 38% Reinforcement learning · 38% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.912025
Generalizable Motion Planning via Operator Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural operator
0.912025
Generalizable Motion Planning via Operator Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation
0.912025
Generalizable Motion Planning via Operator Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.612022
Concurrent Policy Blending and System Identification for Generalized Assistive Control · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.612022
Concurrent Policy Blending and System Identification for Generalized Assistive Control · ICRA 2022
Human-robot interaction
assistive robotics
0.612022
Concurrent Policy Blending and System Identification for Generalized Assistive Control · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system identification · 1.1domain randomization · 1.1neural operator · 0.9a* · 0.9RRT · 0.9Eikonal PDE · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Generalizable Motion Planning via Operator Learning
abstract
In this work, we introduce a planning neural operator (PNO) for predicting the value function of a motion planning problem. We recast value function approximation as learning a single operator from the cost function space to the value function space, which is defined by an Eikonal partial differential equation (PDE). Therefore, our PNO model, despite being trained with a finite number of samples at coarse resolution, inherits the zero-shot super-resolution property of neural operators. We demonstrate accurate value function approximation at 16× the training resolution on the MovingAI lab’s 2D city dataset, compare with state-of-the-art neural value function predictors on 3D scenes from the iGibson building dataset and showcase optimal planning with 4-joint robotic manipulators. Lastly, we investigate employing the value function output of PNO as a heuristic function to accelerate motion planning. We show theoretically that the PNO heuristic is $\epsilon$-consistent by introducing an inductive bias layer that guarantees our value functions satisfy the triangle inequality. With our heuristic, we achieve a $30$% decrease in nodes visited while obtaining near optimal path lengths on the MovingAI lab 2D city dataset, compared to classical planning methods (A$^\ast$, RRT$^\ast$).
Sharath Matada, Luke Bhan, Nikolay Atanasov 0001
ICLR2
2022 Concurrent Policy Blending and System Identification for Generalized Assistive Control
abstract
In this work, we address the problem of solving complex collaborative robotic tasks subject to multiple varying parameters. Our approach combines simultaneous policy blending with system identification to create generalized policies that are robust to changes in system parameters. We employ a blending network whose state space relies solely on parameter estimates from a system identification technique. As a result, this blending network learns how to handle parameter changes instead of trying to learn how to solve the task for a generalized parameter set simultaneously. We demonstrate our scheme's ability on a collaborative robot and human itching task in which the human has motor impairments. We then showcase our approach's efficiency with a variety of system identification techniques when compared to standard domain randomization. The code is available on Luke Bhan's Github.
Luke Bhan, Marcos Quiñones-Grueiro, Gautam Biswas
ICRA1